SIST EN ISO 10360-5:2020

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-julij-2020
Nadomešča:
SIST EN ISO 10360-4:2000
SIST EN ISO 10360-4:2000/AC:2004
SIST EN ISO 10360-5:2011
Specifikacija geometrijskih veličin izdelka (GPS) - Preskusi za sprejemljivost in
ponovno overjanje koordinatnih merilnih strojev (KMS) - 5. del: Koordinatni merilni
stroji, uporabljeni kot enotipalni in večtipalni sondirni sistemi z uporabo diskretne
točke in/ali načina merjenja skeniranja (ISO 10360-5:2020)
Geometrical product specifications (GPS) - Acceptance and reverification tests for
coordinate measuring systems (CMS) - Part 5: Coordinate measuring machines (CMMs)
using single and multiple stylus contacting probing systems using discrete point and/or
scanning measuring mode (ISO 10360-5:2020)
Geometrische Produktspezifikation (GPS) - Annahmeprüfung und Bestätigungsprüfung
für Koordinatenmessgeräte (KMG) - Teil 5: Prüfung der Antastabweichungen von KMG
mit berührendem Messkopfsystem im Einzelpunkt- und/oder Scanningbetrieb (ISO
10360-5:2020)
Spécification géométrique des produits (GPS) - Essais de réception et de vérification
périodique des systèmes à mesurer tridimensionnelles (MMT) - Partie 5: MMT utilisant
des systèmes de palpage à stylet simple ou à stylets multiples (ISO 10360-5:2020)
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: EN ISO 10360-5:2020
ICS:
17.040.30 Merila Measuring instruments
17.040.40 Specifikacija geometrijskih Geometrical Product
veličin izdelka (GPS) Specification (GPS)
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

EN ISO 10360-5
EUROPEAN STANDARD
NORME EUROPÉENNE
April 2020
EUROPÄISCHE NORM
ICS 17.040.30 Supersedes EN ISO 10360-4:2000,
EN ISO 10360-5:2010
English Version
Geometrical product specifications (GPS) - Acceptance and
reverification tests for coordinate measuring systems
(CMS) - Part 5: Coordinate measuring machines (CMMs)
using single and multiple stylus contacting probing
systems using discrete point and/or scanning measuring
mode (ISO 10360-5:2020)
Spécification géométrique des produits (GPS) - Essais Geometrische Produktspezifikation (GPS) -
de réception et de vérification périodique des systèmes Annahmeprüfung und Bestätigungsprüfung für
à mesurer tridimensionnels (SMT) - Partie 5: MMT Koordinatenmesssysteme (KMS) - Teil 5: Prüfung der
utilisant des systèmes de palpage à stylet simple ou à Antastabweichungen von Koordinatenmessgeräten
stylets multiples utilisant un mode de mesurage par (KMG) mit berührendem Messkopfsystem im
point discret et/ou par scan (ISO 10360-5:2020) Einzelpunkt- und/oder Scanningbetrieb (ISO 10360-
5:2020)
This European Standard was approved by CEN on 22 March 2020.

CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this
European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references
concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre or to any CEN
member.
This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by
translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC Management
Centre has the same status as the official versions.

CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway,
Poland, Portugal, Republic of North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and
United Kingdom.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATIO N

EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NOR M UN G

CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels
© 2020 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. EN ISO 10360-5:2020 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.

Contents Page
European foreword . 3

European foreword
This document (EN ISO 10360-5:2020) has been prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 213
"Dimensional and geometrical product specifications and verification" in collaboration with Technical
Committee CEN/TC 290 “Dimensional and geometrical product specification and verification” the
secretariat of which is held by AFNOR.
This European Standard shall be given the status of a national standard, either by publication of an
identical text or by endorsement, at the latest by October 2020, and conflicting national standards shall
be withdrawn at the latest by October 2020.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. CEN shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
This document supersedes EN ISO 10360-4:2000 and EN ISO 10360-5:2010.
According to the CEN-CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organizations of the
following countries are bound to implement this European Standard: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria,
Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland,
Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Republic of
North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and the
United Kingdom.
Endorsement notice
The text of ISO 10360-5:2020 has been approved by CEN as EN ISO 10360-5:2020 without any
modification.
INTERNATIONAL ISO
STANDARD 10360-5
Third edition
2020-03
Geometrical product specifications
(GPS) — Acceptance and reverification
tests for coordinate measuring
systems (CMS) —
Part 5:
Coordinate measuring machines
(CMMs) using single and multiple
stylus contacting probing systems
using discrete point and/or scanning
measuring mode
Spécification géométrique des produits (GPS) — Essais de
réception et de vérification périodique des systèmes à mesurer
tridimensionnels (SMT) —
Partie 5: MMT utilisant des systèmes de palpage à stylet simple ou à
stylets multiples utilisant un mode de mesurage par point discret et/
ou par scan
Reference number
ISO 10360-5:2020(E)
©
ISO 2020
ISO 10360-5:2020(E)
© ISO 2020
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication may
be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting
on the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address
below or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
CP 401 • Ch. de Blandonnet 8
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva
Phone: +41 22 749 01 11
Fax: +41 22 749 09 47
Email: copyright@iso.org
Website: www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii © ISO 2020 – All rights reserved

ISO 10360-5:2020(E)
Contents Page
Foreword .v
Introduction .vi
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions . 2
4 Symbols . 8
5 Rated operating conditions .10
5.1 Environmental conditions .10
5.2 Operating conditions .11
6 Acceptance tests and reverification tests .11
6.1 General .11
6.2 Measuring equipment .12
6.2.1 Test sphere .12
6.2.2 Styli specification and information .13
6.3 Single-stylus probing test .14
6.3.1 Application .14
6.3.2 Principle .14
6.3.3 Procedure .14
6.3.4 Data analysis .15
6.4 Scanning mode test .16
6.4.1 Principle .16
6.4.2 Procedure .16
6.4.3 Data analysis .18
6.5 Multi-stylus test: Fixed multi-probe and multi-stylus probing systems .19
6.5.1 Principle .19
6.5.2 Procedure .19
6.5.3 Data analysis .22
6.6 Multi-stylus test: Articulating probing systems .22
6.6.1 Principle .22
6.6.2 Procedure .23
6.6.3 Data analysis .25
6.7 Data analysis for multi-stylus tests .25
6.7.1 Location error .25
6.7.2 Opposing-styli projected location error .25
6.7.3 Multi-stylus size and form error .25
7 Conformance with specification: Acceptance and reverification tests .26
8 Applications .27
8.1 Acceptance tests .27
8.2 Reverification tests .27
8.3 Interim checks .27
Annex A (informative) Ring gauge tests .28
Annex B (informative) Checking the probing system prior to the ISO 10360-2 test.32
Annex C (informative) Interpretation of multi-stylus test results .33
Annex D (normative) Maximum permissible error/limit specification methods .35
Annex E (informative) Workpiece related influences .37
Annex F (normative) Acceptance tests and reverification tests using small sphere test
equipment .39
Annex G (informative) Relation to the GPS matrix model .40
ISO 10360-5:2020(E)
Bibliography .42
iv © ISO 2020 – All rights reserved

ISO 10360-5:2020(E)
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out
through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical
committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International
organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work.
ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of
electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are
described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular, the different approval criteria needed for the
different types of ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the
editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www .iso .org/ directives).
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of
any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in the Introduction and/or
on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www .iso .org/ patents).
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation of the voluntary nature of standards, the meaning of ISO specific terms and
expressions related to conformity assessment, as well as information about ISO's adherence to the
World Trade Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) see www .iso .org/
iso/ foreword .html.
This document was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 213, Dimensional and geometrical product
specifications and verification in collaboration with the European Committee for Standardization (CEN)
Technical Committee CEN/TC 290, Dimensional and geometrical product specification and verification, in
accordance with the Agreement on technical cooperation between ISO and CEN (Vienna Agreement).
This third edition cancels and replaces the second edition (ISO 10360-5:2010), which has been
technically revised.
It also incorporates with a technical revision the tests contained within ISO 10360-4:2000 and, as such,
it cancels and replaces ISO 10360-4:2000.
The main changes to the previous edition are as follows:
— the adoption of new symbology;
— the addition of an optional ring gauge test;
— changes to acceptable test parameters e.g. test sphere diameter;
— changes to Location results evaluation including an “opposing styli” evaluation.
A list of all parts in the ISO 10360 series can be found on the ISO website.
Any feedback or questions on this document should be directed to the user’s national standards body. A
complete listing of these bodies can be found at www .iso .org/ members .html.
ISO 10360-5:2020(E)
Introduction
This document is a geometrical product specification (GPS) standard and is to be regarded as a general
GPS standard (see ISO 14638). It influences chain link F of the chains of standards on size, distance,
form, orientation, location and run-out.
The ISO GPS matrix model given in ISO 14638 gives an overview of the ISO GPS system of which this
document is a part. The fundamental rules of ISO GPS given in ISO 8015 apply to this document and
the default decision rules given in ISO 14253-1 apply to specifications made in accordance with this
document, unless otherwise indicated.
For more detailed information about the relation of this document to other standards and the GPS
matrix model see Annex G.
The acceptance and reverification tests described in this document are applicable to coordinate
measuring machines (CMMs) that use contacting probes, with or without multiple styli or multiple
articulated-probe positions, when measuring using discrete point and/or scanning mode.
Experience has shown that the multi-stylus errors calculated using this document are significant and,
at times, represent the dominant errors in the CMM. Owing to the virtually infinite variety of modern
CMM probing system configurations, the description of the tests specified by this document provides
a testing protocol for specification, but the actual test coverage has been limited to provide a practical
subset of tests which are intended to reveal typical errors associated with probing configurations
in a limited amount of time. The tests are intended to provide information on the ability of a CMM to
measure a feature or features using a contacting probe and, when relevant, using multiple styli, multiple
probes or multiple articulated-probe positions.
The situations to which they are applicable include:
— single-stylus probing systems;
— multiple styli connected to the CMM probe (e.g. a star);
— installations using an articulating probing system (motorized or manual) that can be prequalified;
— installations using a repeatable probe-changing system;
— installations using a repeatable stylus-changing system;
— installations including a scanning probe, capable of being used in a scanning mode;
— multi-probe installations.
It is believed that the procedures given in this document will be helpful in identifying CMM system
uncertainty components for specific measurement tasks, and that the user will be able to reduce errors
by removing contributing elements such as long probe extensions and styli, and then by retesting the
new configuration set.
The tests in this document are sensitive to many errors, attributable to both the CMM and the
probing system, and are intended to be performed in addition to the length-measuring tests given in
ISO 10360-2.
The primary objective is to determine the practical performance of the complete CMM and probing
system. Therefore, the tests are designed to reveal measuring errors which are likely to occur when
such a combined system is used on real workpieces, for example errors generated by the interaction
between large probe-tip-offset lengths and uncorrected CMM rotation errors. The errors found here
differ from those found in the EL tests in ISO 10360-2, because with multiple styli the net CMM travel
may be very different from the measured length. See Annex C for more information.
vi © ISO 2020 – All rights reserved

ISO 10360-5:2020(E)
This document complements ISO 10360-7 (CMMs equipped with imaging probing systems), ISO 10360-8
(CMMs with optical distance sensors), ISO 10360-9 (CMMs with multiple probing systems) and
ISO 10360-2 (CMMs used for measuring linear dimensions).
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 10360-5:2020(E)
Geometrical product specifications (GPS) — Acceptance
and reverification tests for coordinate measuring
systems (CMS) —
Part 5:
Coordinate measuring machines (CMMs) using single and
multiple stylus contacting probing systems using discrete
point and/or scanning measuring mode
1 Scope
This document specifies acceptance and periodic reverification tests of CMM performance with
contacting probing systems and is only applicable to CMMs using:
— any type of contacting probing system; and
— spherical or hemispherical stylus tip(s).
NOTE CMM probing performance tests are specified by the maximum permissible errors (MPEs), due to the
impracticality of isolating the performance of the probing system from that of the CMM, even on a small artefact
such as a test sphere.
This document applies to CMMs supplied with any of the following:
a) single-stylus probing systems;
b) multi-stylus probing systems with fixed multiple styli attached to a single probe (e.g. “star” stylus);
c) multiple probing systems such as those with a stylus for each of their probes;
d) systems with articulating probing systems;
e) stylus and probe changing systems;
f) manual (non-driven) and automated CMMs;
g) installations including a scanning probe, capable of being used in a scanning mode.
This document is not applicable to non-contacting probing systems, which require different testing
procedures.
The term ‘combined CMM and multi-stylus probing system size error’ has been shortened to ‘multi-
stylus size error’ for convenience. This applies in similar cases.
If it is desirable to isolate the probing system performance as far as is practical, the influence of the
CMM can be minimized but not eliminated. See Annex C for more information.
2 Normative references
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content
constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For
undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO 10360-5:2020(E)
ISO 10360-1, Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) — Acceptance and reverification tests for coordinate
measuring machines (CMM) — Part 1: Vocabulary
ISO 10360-2, Geometrical product specifications (GPS) — Acceptance and reverification tests for coordinate
measuring machines (CMM) — Part 2: CMMs used for measuring linear dimensions
ISO 14253-1, Geometrical product specifications (GPS) — Inspection by measurement of workpieces and
measuring equipment — Part 1: Decision rules for verifying conformity or nonconformity with specifications
ISO/IEC Guide 99:2007, International vocabulary of metrology — Basic and general concepts and
associated terms (VIM)
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in ISO 10360-1, ISO 14253-1,
ISO/IEC Guide 99 and the following apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at https:// www .iso .org/ obp
— IEC Electropedia: available at http:// www .electropedia .org/
NOTE 1 This clause contains fifteen definitions (3.7 to 3.9, 3.11 to 3.15, 3.19 to 3.21, 3.23 and 3.25 to 3.27)
which supersede eighteen similar definitions in ISO 10360-1:2000, Clause 9. Some of these revised definitions
are required to avoid ambiguities which would otherwise have been introduced with this document. Others
effectively supersede identical definitions in ISO 10360-1, because the symbols used have been revised and
expanded for clarification. The superseded definitions in ISO 10360-1:2000 are 9.3, 9.4 and 9.11 to 9.26.
NOTE 2 All the symbols used in this document are listed in Clause 4.
NOTE 3 The definitions in this clause are intended to concisely state the meaning of terms. For metrological
characteristics that have numerical values, the complete description of the procedure and derivation of test
results in Clause 6 are to be followed in determining values.
NOTE 4 For all definitions and evaluations in this document we assume the form and location values to be
zero, i.e. perfect form or zero location distance for a single test sphere. See 6.2.1 for limitations on test sphere
calibrated form.
3.1
rated operating condition
operating condition that needs to be fulfilled during measurement in order for a measuring instrument
or measuring system to perform as designed
Note 1 to entry: Rated operating conditions generally specify intervals of values for a quantity being measured
and for any influence quantity.
Note 2 to entry: Within the ISO 10360 series, the term “as designed” means as specified by MPEs.
Note 3 to entry: If an MPE specification is thought of as a function (where different MPE values could be given for
different conditions), then the rated operating conditions define the domain of that function.
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC Guide 99:2007, 4.9, modified — Notes 2 and 3 to entry added.]
3.2
inferred qualification
probing system qualification method where the parameters for each probing system attached to
an articulation system are inferred by interpolation, extrapolation or another relevant model, for
significantly different angular position(s) from parameters acquired by empirical qualification (3.3) at a
few angular positions
2 © ISO 2020 – All rights reserved

ISO 10360-5:2020(E)
3.3
empirical qualification
probing system qualification method where the parameters for each probing system attached to an
articulation system need to be acquired by measurement of the reference sphere at each angular
position used
Note 1 to entry: “Reference sphere” is sometimes in industry referred to as “qualification sphere”.
3.4
effective diameter
stylus diameter used with the tip correction vector, for compensating stylus centre points to obtain
surface points
Note 1 to entry: For the position of the tip correction vector, see ISO 10360-1:2000, Figure 4.
Note 2 to entry: The effective stylus tip diameter may be a parameter established by a probing system
qualification.
3.5
multi-stylus probing system
fixed orientation single probe that carries star styli or which through stylus changing can present styli
at the relevant orientations to be equivalent to a star stylus
Note 1 to entry: See Figure 6.
3.6
multi-probe system
system in which multiple probes with different fixed orientations are carried simultaneously
Note 1 to entry: See Figure 7.
3.7
multi-stylus form error
P
Form.Sph.5×25:j:Tact
observed form of a test sphere, the measurements being taken with five different styli, each taking
25 points (5 × 25) on the one test sphere using the discrete-point probing mode
Note 1 to entry: See ISO 10360-1:2000, Figure 15.
Note 2 to entry: The symbol P in P indicates that the error is associated with the system
Form.Sph.5×25:j:Tact
performance when local sampling, and the subscript indicates that it is a form error. The subscript
Form Sph
indicates that the test is performed using a sphere as a test artefact. The subscript indicates that the probing
Tact
system conforms to Clause 1 of this document (i.e. tactile), thus enabling any alternative probing system to be
clearly identified by the use of a different set of characters at * in P .
Form.Sph.5×25:j:*
Note 3 to entry: There are four multi-stylus form errors based on different probing systems and methods of
operation. These are designated as follows:
— j = MS, a fixed multi-stylus probing system (3.5);
— j = MP, a fixed multi-probe system (3.6);
— j = Emp, an articulating probing system using empirical qualification (3.3);
— j = Inf, an articulating probing system using inferred qualification (3.2).
3.8
multi-stylus size error
P
Size.Sph.5×25:j:Tact
error of indication of the diameter of a test sphere, the measurements being taken with five different
styli, each taking 25 points on the one test sphere by a CMM using the discrete-point probing mode
Note 1 to entry: The subscript in P indicates that it is a diameter size error.
Size Size.Sph.5×25:j:Tact
ISO 10360-5:2020(E)
Note 2 to entry: Where j is replaced by MS, MP, Emp or Inf as applicable.
3.9
multi-stylus location error
L
Dia.5×25:j:Tact
error of indication of the location of a test sphere as measured using the discrete-point probing mode
from five different orientations
Note 1 to entry: The symbol L in L indicates that it is a location error.
Dia.5×25:j:Tact
Note 2 to entry: Where j is replaced by MS, MP, Emp or Inf as applicable.
3.10
opposing-styli projected location error on a sphere
L
Dia.Proj.Sph.2×25:j:Tact
error of indication of the location of a test sphere as measured using discrete-point probing from
opposing orientations
Note 1 to entry: This gives the user an indication as to the performance of the system when measuring, for
example, co-axiality of crank shaft journals using styli from opposing orientations.
Note 2 to entry: Where j is replaced by MS, MP, Emp or Inf as applicable.
3.11
single-stylus form error
P
Fo r m . Sp h .1×25: S S : Ta c t
observed form of a test sphere, the measurements being performed by a CMM with a single stylus (SS),
using the discrete-point probing mode taking 25 points on a single sphere (1 × 25)
Note 1 to entry: See ISO 10360-1:2000, Figure 15.
Note 2 to entry: The subscript SS in P indicates use of a single stylus.
Fo r m . S p h .1×2 5: S S: Tac t
3.12
single-stylus size error
P
Si z e . Sp h .1×25: S S : Ta c t
error of indication of the diameter of a test sphere, the measurements being performed by a CMM with
a single stylus, using the discrete-point probing mode
3.13
scanning mode form error on a sphere
P
Form.Sph.Scan: k : Ta c t
observed form of a test sphere, the measurements being performed by a CMM with a single stylus, using
scanning mode
Note 1 to entry: Where k is replaced by the following designates as applicable: k = PP or NPP depending on system
scanning mode, pre-defined path (PP) or not pre-defined path (NPP).
3.14
scanning mode size error on a sphere
P
Size.Sph.Scan:k : Ta c t
error of indication of the size of a test sphere, the measurements being performed by a CMM with a
single stylus, using scanning mode
Note 1 to entry: Where k is replaced by the following designates as applicable: k = PP or NPP depending on system
scanning mode, pre-defined path or not pre-defined path.
4 © ISO 2020 – All rights reserved

ISO 10360-5:2020(E)
3.15
scanning mode time
τ
Sph.Scan:k : Ta c t
time taken to perform the scanning test
Note 1 to entry: Where k is replaced by the following designates as applicable: k = PP or NPP depending on system
scanning mode, pre-defined path or not pre-defined path.
Note 2 to entry: Time is stated in seconds.
3.16
scanning mode form error on a ring gauge
P
Form.Cir.Scan:k .lo : Ta c t
observed form of a ring gauge, the measurements being performed by a CMM using scanning mode with
a single stylus aligned to the ram axis if l = 0 mm, or a single stylus orthogonal to the ram axis with
o
l = 150 mm as the default
o
Note 1 to entry: Where k is replaced by the following designates as applicable: k = PP or NPP depending on system
scanning mode, pre-defined path or not pre-defined path.
Note 2 to entry: Where l is replaced with the relevant length of ram axis stylus tip offset in the specification of
o
the manufacturer.
Note 3 to entry: See Annex A for the test definition for this optional test.
Note 4 to entry: Ram axis stylus tip offset l in this document is normally equivalent to ram axis stylus tip offset L
o
used in ISO 10360-2. An example where it is different is a horizontal arm machine where the articulated head is
mounted vertically.
3.17
scanning mode size error on a ring gauge
P
Size.Cir.Scan: k .lo : Ta c t
error of indication of the size of a ring gauge, the measurements being performed by a CMM using
scanning mode with a single stylus aligned to the ram axis if l = 0 mm; or a single stylus orthogonal to
o
the ram axis with l = 150 mm as the default unless otherwise specified
o
Note 1 to entry: Where k is replaced by the following designates as applicable: k = PP or NPP depending on system
scanning mode, pre-defined path or not pre-defined path.
Note 2 to entry: Where l is replaced with the relevant length of ram axis stylus tip offset in the specification of
o
the manufacturer.
Note 3 to entry: See Annex A for the test definition for this optional test.
3.18
opposing-styli projected location error on a ring gauge
L
Dia.Proj.Cir.Scan: j: Ta c t
error of indication of the location of a ring gauge as measured using scanning mode probing from
opposing orientations
Note 1 to entry: This gives the user an indication as to the performance of the system when measuring, for
example, co-axiality of crank shaft journals using styli from opposing orientations.
Note 2 to entry: Where j is replaced by MS, MP, Emp or Inf as applicable.
3.19
maximum permissible multi-stylus form error
P
Form.Sph.5×25:j:Tact,MPE
extreme value of the multi-stylus form error (3.7), P , permitted by specifications
Form.Sph.5×25:j:Tact
Note 1 to entry: See Annex D for how this MPE may be expressed.
Note 2 to entry: Where j is replaced by MS, MP, Emp or Inf as applicable.
ISO 10360-5:2020(E)
3.20
maximum permissible multi-stylus size error
P
Size.Sph.5×25:j:Tact,MPE
extreme value of the multi-stylus size error (3.8), P , permitted by specifications
Size.Sph.5×25:j:Tact
Note 1 to entry: See Annex D for how this MPE may be expressed.
Note 2 to entry: Where j is replaced by MS, MP, Emp or Inf as applicable.
3.21
maximum permissible multi-stylus location error
L
Dia.5×25:j:Tact,MPE
extreme value of the multi-stylus location error (3.9), L , permitted by specifications
Dia.5×25:j:Tact
Note 1 to entry: See Annex D for how this MPE may be expressed.
Note 2 to entry: Where j is replaced by MS, MP, Emp or Inf as applicable.
3.22
maximum permissible opposing-styli projected location error on a sphere
L
Dia.Proj.Sph.2×25:j:Tact,MPE
extreme value of the opposing-styli projected location error on a sphere (3.10), L ,
Dia.Proj.Sph.2×25:j:Tact
permitted by specifications
Note 1 to entry: See Annex D for how this MPE may be expressed.
Note 2 to entry: Where j is replaced by MS, MP, Emp or Inf as applicable.
3.23
maximum permissible single-stylus form error
P
Form.Sph.1×25:SS: Tact ,MPE
extreme value of the single-stylus form error (3.11), P , permitted by specifications
Fo r m . Sp h .1×25: S S : Ta c t
Note 1 to entry: See ISO 10360-1:2000, Figure 15.
Note 2 to entry: P is specified against an unambiguous description of the probe and stylus
Form.Sph.1×25:SS: Tact
make up.
3.24
maximum permissible single-stylus size error
P
Size.Sph.1×25:SS: Tact ,MPE
extreme value of the single-stylus size error (3.12), P , permitted by specifications
Si z e . Sp h .1×25: S S : Ta c t
Note 1 to entry: P is specified against an unambiguous description of the probe and stylus
Size.Sph.1×25:SS: Tact ,MPE
make up.
3.25
maximum permissible scanning mode form error on a sphere
P
Form.Sph.Scan: k: Tact ,MPE
extreme value of the scanning mode form error on a sphere (3.13), P , permitted by
Form.Sph.Scan: k : Ta c t
specifications
Note 1 to entry: Where k is replaced by the following designates as applicable: k = PP or NPP depending on system
scanning mode, pre-defined path or not pre-defined path.
3.26
maximum permissible scanning mode size error on a sphere
P
Size.Sph.Scan:k : Tact ,MPE
extreme value of the scanning mode size error on a sphere (3.14), P , permitted by
Size.Sph.Scan:k : Ta c t
specifications
Note 1 to entry: Where k is replaced by the following designates as applicable: k = PP or NPP depending on system
scanning mode, pre-defined path or not pre-defined path.
6 © ISO 2020 – All rights reserved

ISO 10360-5:2020(E)
3.27
maximum permissible scanning mode time
τ
Sph.Scan:k : Tact ,MPL
extreme value of the scanning mode time (3.15), τ
Sph.Scan:k : Ta c t
Note 1 to entry: Where k is replaced by the following designates as applicable: k = PP or NPP depending on system
scanning mode, pre-defined path or not pre-defined path.
Note 2 to entry: Maximum permissible scanning mode time is stated in seconds.
3.28
maximum permissible scanning mode form error on a ring gauge
P
Form.Cir.Scan:k .lo: Tact ,MPE
extreme value of the scanning mode form error on a ring gauge (3.16) with a ram axis stylus tip offset of
l , P , permitted by specifications
o Form.Cir.Scan:k .lo : Ta c t
Note 1 to entry: Where k is replaced by the following designates as applicable: k = PP or NPP depending on system
scanning mode, pre-defined path or not pre-defined path.
Note 2 to entry: Where l is replaced with the relevant length of ram axis stylus tip offset in the specification of
o
the manufacturer.
Note 3 to entry: See Annex A for the test definition for this optional test.
3.29
maximum permissible scanning mode size error on a ring gauge
P
Size.Cir.Scan: k .lo: Tact ,MPE
extreme value of the scanning mode size error on a ring gauge (3.17) with a ram axis stylus tip offset of
l , P , permitted by specifications
o Size.Cir.Scan: k .lo : Ta c t
Note 1 to entry: Where k is replaced by the following designates as applicable: k = PP or NPP depending on system
scanning mode, pre-defined path or not pre-defined path.
Note 2 to entry: Where l is replaced with the relevant length of ram axis stylus tip offset in the specification of
o
the manufacturer.
Note 3 to entry: See Annex A for the test definition for this optional test.
3.30
maximum permissible opposing-styli projected location error on a ring gauge
L
Dia.Proj.Cir.Scan: j: Tact ,MPE
extreme value of the opposing-styli projected location error on a ring gauge (3.18), L ,
Dia.Proj.Cir.Scan: j: Ta c t
permitted by specifications
Note 1 to entry: See Annex D for how this MPE may be expressed.
Note 2 to entry: Where j is replaced by MS, MP, Emp or Inf as applicable.
Note 3 to entry: See Annex A for the test definition for this optional test.
ISO 10360-5:2020(E)
4 Symbols
For the purposes of this document, the following symbols apply. Alternative, unformatted presentations
that may be used in product documentation, drawings or data sheets are provided in the third column.
Description Symbol used in this Alternative, unformatted presentations
document
Positive constant, expressed in A Not applicable
micrometres and supplied by the
manufacturer, used to express a
maximum permissible limit or
error (in accordance with
Annex D)
Dimensionless positive constant K Not applicable
supplied by the manufacturer,
used to express a maximum
permissible limit or error
(in accordance with Annex D)
L[P]
Distance in 3D between the cen- L
P
tres of the reference sphere and
the test sphere, in millimetres
(also see Annex C and Annex D)
Maximum permissible error in B Not applicable
micrometres as stated by the
manufacturer (in accordance with
Annex D)
Least-squares radial distance R Not applicable
Maximum least-squares radial R Not applicable
max
distance
Minimum least-squares radial R Not applicable
min
distance
l[o]
Ram axis stylus tip offset l
o
Sphere or ring gauge diameter as D Not applicable
meas
measured
Sphere or ring gauge diameter as D Not applicable
cal
calibrated
Single-stylus test related symbols
P[Form.Sph.1×25:SS:Tact]
Single-stylus form error P
Fo r m . S p h .1×2 5: S S: Tac t
P[Size.Sph.1×25:SS:Tact]
Single-stylus size error P
Si z e . Sp h .1×2 5: S S : Ta c t
MPE(P[Form.Sph.1×25:SS:Tact])
Maximum permissible single P
Form.Sph.1×25
...