oSIST prEN 17020-1:2016

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-september-2016
Razširjena uporaba rezultatov preskusov trajnosti samozapiranja za požarno
odporna in/ali dimotesna vrata in okna, ki se odpirajo - 1. del: Trajnost
samozapiranja jeklenih vrat z vrtljivim krilom
Extended application of test results on durability of self-closing for fire resistance and/or
smoke control doorsets and openable windows - Part 1: Durability of self-closing of
hinged and pivoted steel doorsets
Erweiterter Anwendungsbereich von Prüfergebnissen zur Dauerhaftigkeit des
Selbstschließens für Feuerschutz- und/oder Rauchschutztüren und zu öffnende Fenster -
Teil 1: Dauerhaftigkeit des Selbstschließens von Drehflügeltüren aus Stahl
Application étendue des résultats d’essais de durabilité de la fermeture automatique des
blocs-portes et fenêtres ouvrantes résistants au feu et/ou étanches à la fumée - Partie 1 :
Durabilité de la fermeture automatique des blocs-portes battants et pivotants en acier
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: prEN 17020-1
ICS:
13.220.50 Požarna odpornost Fire-resistance of building
gradbenih materialov in materials and elements
elementov
91.060.50 Vrata in okna Doors and windows
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

DRAFT
EUROPEAN STANDARD
NORME EUROPÉENNE
EUROPÄISCHE NORM
June 2016
ICS 13.220.50; 91.060.50
English Version
Extended application of test results on durability of self-
closing for fire resistance and/or smoke control doorsets
and openable windows - Part 1: Durability of self-closing
of hinged and pivoted steel doorsets

This draft European Standard is submitted to CEN members for enquiry. It has been drawn up by the Technical Committee
CEN/TC 33.
If this draft becomes a European Standard, CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations
which stipulate the conditions for giving this European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration.

This draft European Standard was established by CEN in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other
language made by translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC
Management Centre has the same status as the official versions.

CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania,
Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and
United Kingdom.
Recipients of this draft are invited to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant patent rights of which they are
aware and to provide supporting documentation.

Warning : This document is not a European Standard. It is distributed for review and comments. It is subject to change without
notice and shall not be referred to as a European Standard.

EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION

EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG

CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels
© 2016 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. prEN 17020-1:2016 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.

Contents Page
European foreword . 3
Introduction . 4
1 Scope . 5
2 Normative references . 5
3 Terms and definitions . 6
4 Determination of the field of extended application . 6
4.1 General . 6
4.2 Procedure for evaluation . 7
4.3 Procedure for maximum field of extended application . 7
4.4 Interpretation of test results . 8
5 Extended application report . 8
6 Classification report . 8
Annex A (normative) Construction parameter variations . 9
Annex B (normative) Construction parameter variation simulation by applying additional
weights . 42
Bibliography . 43

European foreword
This document (prEN 17020-1:2016) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 33 “Doors,
windows, shutters, building hardware and curtain walling”, the secretariat of which is held by AFNOR.
This document is currently submitted to the CEN Enquiry.
Introduction
The EN 15269 series of standards covering extended application of test results for fire resistance
and/or smoke control for door, shutter and openable window assemblies, including their elements of
building hardware, does not include the durability of self-closing of the doorsets following an extended
application process. This document is one of a series of standards intended to be used for the purpose
of producing an extended application report based on the evaluation of one or more durability self-
closing tests. These European Standards may also be used to identify the best selection of test
specimens required to cover a wide range of product variations.
Before there can be any consideration for extended application, the doorset will need to have been
tested in accordance with EN 1634-1 resp. EN 1634-3 and EN 1191 to achieve a test result which could
generate a classification in accordance with EN 13501-2 at least equal to the classification subsequently
required from extended application considerations.
1 Scope
This European Standard covers single and double leaf, hinged and pivoted, steel based doorsets covered
by EN 15269-2.
This document prescribes the methodology for extending the application of test results obtained from
durability self-closing test(s) conducted in accordance with EN 1191.
Subject to the completion of the appropriate self-closing test or tests, the extended application may
cover all or some of the following examples:
— door leaf;
— side, transom and/or overpanels;
— ventilation grilles and/or louvres
— wall/ceiling fixed elements (frame/suspension system);
— glazing for door leaf, side, transom and flush over panels;
— items of building hardware;
— decorative finishes;
— intumescent, smoke, draught or acoustic seals;
— alternative supporting construction(s).
2 Normative references
The following documents, in whole or in part, are normatively referenced in this document and are
indispensable for its application. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated
references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
EN 1191, Windows and doors - Resistance to repeated opening and closing - Test method
EN 1363-1, Fire resistance tests - Part 1: General Requirements
EN 1634-1, Fire resistance and smoke control tests for door and shutter assemblies, openable windows and
elements of building hardware - Part 1: Fire resistance test for door and shutter assemblies and openable
windows
EN 1634-3, Fire resistance and smoke control tests for door and shutter assemblies, openable windows and
elements of building hardware - Part 3: Smoke control test for door and shutter assemblies
EN 13501-2:2007+A1:2009, Fire classification of construction products and building elements — Part 2:
Classification using data from fire resistance tests, excluding ventilation services
EN 15269-1:2010, Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door,
shutter and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware - Part 1: General
requirements
EN 15269-2, Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door, shutter
and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware - Part 2: Fire resistance of
hinged and pivoted steel doorsets
EN ISO 13943, Fire safety - Vocabulary (ISO 13943)
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in EN 1191, EN 1363-1,
EN ISO 13943, EN 1634-1, EN 1634-3, EN 15269-1 and EN 15269-2 and the following apply.
3.1
full scale test
test of a full size doorset in accordance with EN 1191
3.2
core
material fitted centrally within the thickness of a door leaf which may consist of a single sheet of
material or a combination either of sheets of the same material or layers of different materials
3.3
effective rebate depth
dimension of the door leaf thickness of overlapping adjacent edges of door leaf relative to the door
frame, transom or side panel or other door leaf flush overpanel
3.4
panel
component of a door leaf separated from other elements by joints which break through the total door
thickness
Note 1 to entry: A door leaf can consist of one or more panels.
4 Determination of the field of extended application
4.1 General
4.1.1 Before there can be any consideration for extended application the doorset shall have been
tested and classified in accordance with EN 1191 and EN 13501-2 in order to establish a classification
for the doorset. Before the extended application process can be applied on a construction parameter
variation it shall be ensured that the varied doorset is able to self-close without restraint at least once.
4.1.2 A review of the doorset construction parameters can indicate that one or more characteristics
may be improved by a particular parameter variation. All evaluations shall be made on the basis of
retaining the classifications obtainable from testing to EN 1191, including those with a lower number of
opening and closing cycles. However, this shall never lead to an increased classification for any specific
parameter beyond that achieved during any one test unless specifically identified in the relevant
Construction Parameter Variation tables.
4.1.3 All evaluations shall be made on the basis of retaining the classification obtained from testing to
EN 1634-1 or EN 1634-3.
4.1.4 If, when following the extended application procedure, any Part of the classified product cannot
be covered by the extended application rules, that Part shall be omitted from the subsequent extended
application report and classification report.
4.2 Procedure for evaluation
4.2.1 Identify the variations from the original test specimen(s) which are required to be covered by
an extended application report.
4.2.2 Locate the variations in the appropriate parameter variation by reference to columns (1) and
(2) of Table A.1.
4.2.3 Establish from the contents of column (4) of Table A.1 whether any extended application is
available without the need for further testing.
4.2.4 Where this is deemed to be possible this can be recorded in the extended application report
together with any appropriate restrictions and the stated rules from column (4) in Table A.1.
4.2.5 Where the variations required can only be achieved from additional testing according to column
(5), the additional test can be made on a similar specimen type to the original test against which the
extended application is sought. Alternatively, column (5) in Table A.1 identifies an option for alternative
testing and relevant test parameters.
4.3 Procedure for maximum field of extended application
4.3.1 It is possible to provide a limited field of extended application from the results of a single test.
However, where a manufacturer intends to produce a range of doors incorporating single doors and
also double doors with or without glazing, with alternative elements of building hardware, etc., it is
recommended that careful consideration is given to the complete range of doorset designs and options
in order to minimize the testing required before testing commences.
4.3.2 Establish all the parameter variations which are required to be Part of the product range.
4.3.3 Determine which are the most important specification requirements and incorporate as many
as possible into the specimen(s) for the first tests in the series.
4.3.4 Conduct the first durability test or a series of tests and then establish which of the original
desired parameter variations have not been covered by this test(s).
4.3.5 Identify these parameter variations in Table A.1 and establish if any extended application is
possible without further testing.
4.3.6 Record this for the extended application report together with any restrictions and rules given in
column (4) in Table A.1.
4.3.7 Evaluate which, if any, of the desired parameter variations have not been covered by the initial
field of extended application derived from 4.3.6 above.
4.3.8 Determine if the product range is to include only single leaf doorsets or if the range is to also
include double leaf configurations. Where only single doorsets are to be Part of the product range, the
outstanding construction parameter variations shall only be incorporated into specimens for the single
leaf doorsets. Where single leaf and double leaf doorsets are to be included in the product range, the
outstanding construction parameter variations for the extended application of single leaf doorsets may
be incorporated into either repeated single leaf doorset tests or, in the weakest option, as defined in
column (5) of the table in Table A.1, double leaf doorset configurations.
4.3.9 Select the required outstanding parameter variations from column (1) and column (2) of
Table A.1 and observe from column (5) in Table A.1 which are the most appropriate weakest specimen
options for further testing.
4.3.10 If the complete selection of required parameter variations has not been covered by the tests
completed in accordance with 4.3.8 and 4.3.9 above, then an appropriate test or tests may be carried
out with the additional product variations incorporated.
4.4 Interpretation of test results
4.4.1 In order to maximize the extended field of application, it is important that the test reports shall
record details of any premature integrity and/or insulation failure also record details of any distortion
to evaluate low, medium and high distortion (see Table A.1).
4.4.2 Where a series of tests have been conducted, the field of extended application shall be based on
the lowest performance achieved from the complete series of tests unless premature failure has been
attributed to one or more specific construction parameter variations.
4.4.3 Where it has been possible to identify specific parameter failures, the extended application for
all other construction parameter variations can be based on the performance achieved after isolating
the premature failure(s).
5 Extended application report
Prepare an extended application report in accordance with the requirements of EN 15269-1:2010,
Clause 6, based on the results of evaluations in accordance with the above.
6 Classification report
The classification report shall be determined from the results of the extended application report and
shall be presented in accordance with EN 13501-2:2007+A1:2009, Annex A.
Annex A
(normative)
Construction parameter variations
Table A.1 below is designed to be used by experts competent in the field of fire resistance and self-
closing durability testing of hinged and pivoted steel doorsets.
The table shall only be used to assess a field of extended application when at least one positive self-
closing durability test to EN 1191 has generated a classification according to EN 13501-2.
The first two columns identify possible variations to the construction details of the specimen tested. It is
presupposed that the variation does not restrain the door closing.
Column (4) leads to the judgement of the possibility of extending the field of application.
Where additional tests are deemed to be necessary, the type of specimen approved for incorporation of
the changed parameter is defined in column (5). Where it is possible to use information from tests
performed on one configuration for evidence on a different configuration, this allowance has been made
in order to reduce the overall number of tests required for extended application evaluation e.g. single
action doorsets to double action doorsets.
Where an additional test is required in column (5), the test is a full scale test unless otherwise specified.
In order to maximize the possible field of application from a minimum number of tests, the parameter
changes have been spread over a series of test specimens. The recommended tests for each parameter
is depending upon the classification required and the preferred direction of testing as indicated in
column (5).
Where more than a single parameter variation is required, the influence on other variations shall also
be taken into account.
Table A.1 — Construction parameter variations
Influence of
variation on
Construction Parameter Variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required
performance
characteristic
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
A  Door leaf
In certain cases, the rules given in Section A are also appropriate to side, transom and flush over panels or the door frame; where this is the case it is clearly indicated at the
beginning of the relevant section. For double leaf door sets, both leaves shall be of the same basic construction.
A.1 General
A.1.1 Number of leaves Possible –
Single leaf from
only applicable to doorsets tested
=
double leaf test
without transom and/or flush over
panels. See Annex B.
A.1.2 Number of leaves Not possible without additional test Additional test double leaf
doorset
Double leaf from
only applicable to doorsets tested
<
single leaf test
without transom and/or flush over
panels. See Annex B.
Possible if tested at least one leaf (single, primary or Additional test double for single
secondary) with the minimum of two panels, panel and double leaf door sets or single
Add
size not increased and the intended jointing for single leaf doorsets
A.1.3 Number of panels per leaf (primary or
(one panel per
=
technique centrally located in the door leaf
secondary)
leaf — on any
otherwise
leaf)
not possible without an additional test
Possible providing the tested width of the panel is Additional test double for single
Reduce
not increased and double leaf door sets or single
A.1.4 Number of panels per leaf(primary or
=
(one panel per
for single leaf door sets doorset
secondary) otherwise
leaf)
not possible without an additional test
A.1.5 Intumescent seals between frame and Location towards Possible –
> = <
door leaf/leaves the frame rebate
Influence of
variation on
Construction Parameter Variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required
performance
characteristic
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Location away
A.1.6 Intumescent seals between frame and
from the frame > = < Possible –
door leaf/leaves
rebate
A.1.7 Intumescent seals between meeting
Location > = < Possible –
edges of the door leaves
A.1.8 Non intumescent seals between frame
and door leaf/leaves
(draught/smoke/acoustic etc.) — Location = Possible –
Euroclass A1, e.g. ceramic products
(fitted in leaf or frame)
A.1.9 Non intumescent seals between meeting
edges of the door leaves
Location > = < Possible –
(draught/smoke/acoustic etc.) —
Euroclass A1, e.g. ceramic products
A.1.10 Non intumescent seals/combination of
Possible providing the deformation of the seal will
non-intumescent and intumescent seals Additional test double for single
not increase during movement of the door
between door leaves and/or frames Location > = < and double leaf door sets or single
leaf/leaves otherwise
(draught /smoke/acoustic etc.) — for single leaf doorsets
not possible without an additional test
Euroclass A1 (fitted in leaf or frame).
A.1.11 Non intumescent seals between door
leaves and/or frames Additional test double for single
(draught/smoke/acoustic etc.) — Add > = < Not possible without an additional test and double leaf door sets or single
Euroclass A1, e.g. ceramic products for single leaf doorsets
(fitted in leaf or frame).
Influence of
variation on
Construction Parameter Variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required
performance
characteristic
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
A.1.12 Non intumescent seals between door
leaves and/or frames
(draught/smoke/acoustic etc.) — Remove = Possible –
Euroclass A1, e.g. ceramic products
(fitted in leaf or frame)
A.1.13 Non intumescent seals between door
Additional test double for single
leaves and/or frames
Add = Not possible without an additional test and double leaf door sets or single
(draught/smoke/acoustic etc.) —
for single leaf doorsets
< Euroclass A1 (fitted in leaf or frame)
A.1.14 Non intumescent seals between door
leaves and/or frames
Remove = Possible –
(draught/smoke/acoustic etc. —
< Euroclass A1 (fitted in leaf or frame)
possible providing the requirements of Annex B are
Additional test single or double
fulfilled
A.1.15 Ventilation grilles (louvres) in door leaf
leaf doorset
Add =
tested without ventilation grille otherwise

not possible without an additional test
A.1.16 Ventilation grilles (louvres) in door leaf Remove = Possible –
A.1.17 Ventilation grilles (louvres) in door leaf Location in
= Possible –
tested with ventilation grille vertical direction
Location in
Possible
A.1.18 Ventilation grilles (louvres) in door leaf
horizontal = –
tested with ventilation grille

direction
Influence of
variation on
Construction Parameter Variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required
performance
characteristic
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
A.1.19 Ventilation grilles (louvres) in door leaf

tested with ventilation grille
=
Smaller size Possible –
Larger size = possible providing the requirements of Annex B are Additional test single or double
fulfilled leaf doorset
otherwise
not possible without an additional test
A.1.20 Rebate (door leaves to frames) Add = Possible –
Add
A.1.21 Rebate (meeting edges) = Possible –
(one rebate)
A.1.22 Rebate (door leaves to frames) Remove = Possible –
A.1.23 Rebate (meeting edges) Remove = Possible –
Influence of
variation on
Construction Parameter Variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required
performance
characteristic
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Additional test double for single
Possible in line with the following relationship: and double leaf doorsets or single
for single leaf doorsets.
tested with
tested tested with
a latch/lock
without a a latch/lock
but
latch/lock latched
unlatched
extension to:
Change in without a — Possible Not possible
A.1.24 Latched condition for single and double
latching = lock/latch
leaf doorsets
condition
extension to:
with
lock/latch but Possible — Not possible
unlocked/unl
atched
extension to:
with a Not
Not possible —
lock/latch, possible
latched
A.2 Size variations/single or multiple panel construction
A.2.1 Size (area, width, height) Decrease > Possible
Possible providing the requirements of Annex B are
Additional test double for single
fulfilled
A.2.2 Height Increase = and double leaf doorsets or single
otherwise
for single leaf doorsets
not possible without an additional test
Influence of
variation on
Construction Parameter Variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required
performance
characteristic
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Possible by a maximum of 25 % providing that the Additional test double for single
A.2.3 Width Increase > = < requirements of Annex B are fulfilled otherwise not and double leaf doorsets or single
possible without an additional test for single leaf doorsets
Possible in line with A.2.2 and A.2.3
Additional test double for single
A.2.4 Area — Increase > = < otherwise and double leaf doorsets or single
for single leaf doorsets
not possible without an additional test
Possible providing the requirements of Annex B are
Additional test double for single
fulfilled and by a maximum of 25 %
A.2.5 Thickness of the door leaf Increase > = < and double leaf doorsets or single
otherwise
for single leaf doorsets
not possible without an additional test
Possible by a maximum of 25 %
Additional test double for single
A.2.6 Thickness of the door leaf Decrease > = < otherwise and double leaf doorsets or single
for single leaf doorsets
not possible without an additional test
A.3 Materials and constructions
Possible providing the requirements of Annex B are
Additional test double for single
fulfilled
A.3.1 Density of core material Increase = and double leaf doorsets or single
otherwise
for single leaf doorsets
not possible without an additional test
A.3.2 Density of core material Decrease = Possible –
possible providing the requirements of Annex B are Additional test double for single
A.3.3 Thickness of core material Increase = fulfilled otherwise not possible without an and double leaf doorsets or single
additional test for single leaf doorsets
A.3.4 Thickness of core material Decrease = Possible –
Influence of
variation on
Construction Parameter Variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required
performance
characteristic
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Increase number
A.3.5 Pattern of core material = Possible –
of pieces
Decrease
A.3.6 Pattern of core material = Possible
number of pieces
A.3.7 Number of layers of identical and/or
Increase = Possible –
different materials
A.3.8 Number of layers of identical and/or
Decrease = Possible –
different materials
Change of
supplier/manufa
cturer of
A.3.9 Type of core material (single thickness identical
= Possible
or in combination of different layers) material with
identical
composition and
properties
A.3.10 Type of core material (single thickness Alternative
= Possible –
or in combination of different layers) composition
Increase = Possible –
A.3.11 Amount of adhesive/m – organic based
A.3.12 Amount of adhesive/m — organic
Decrease = Possible –
based
A.3.13 Amount of adhesive/m — inorganic
Increase = Possible –
based
A.3.14 Amount of adhesive/m — inorganic
Decrease = possible
based
Influence of
variation on
Construction Parameter Variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required
performance
characteristic
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Change of
manufacturer for
A.3.15 Type of adhesive = Possible –
identical
composition
Alternative
A.3.16 Type of adhesive = Possible –
composition
Possible providing the requirements of Annex B are
fulfilled
A.3.17 Metal armour sheet (internally Additional test single or double
Add =
mounted) otherwise leaf doorset
not possible without an additional test
A.3.18 metal armour sheet (internally
Remove = Possible –
mounted)
A.3.19 Electronic security mesh Add = Possible –
A.3.20 Electronic security mesh Remove = Possible –
Possible up to a maximum of 10 %
above 10 % possible providing the requirements of
Additional test single or double
Annex B are fulfilled
A.3.21 Thickness of steel sheet Increase > / = / <
leaf doorset
otherwise
not possible without an addional test
Possible up to a maximum of 25 %
Additional test double for single
A.3.22 Thickness of steel sheet Decrease > / = / < otherwise and double leaf doorsets or single
for single leaf doorsets
not possible without an additional test
A.3.23 Type of steel sheet Mild to stainless – Possible –
A.3.24 Type of steel sheet Stainless to mild = Possible –
Influence of
variation on
Construction Parameter Variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required
performance
characteristic
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
possible providing the requirements of Annex B are
additional test double for single
fulfilled
A.3.25 Cross — section dimension of stiffening
Increase = and double leaf doorsets or single
elements otherwise
for single leaf doorsets
not possible without an additional test
A.3.26 Cross — section dimension of stiffening
Decrease = Possible –
elements
possible providing the requirements of Annex B are
additional test double for single
fulfilled
A.3.27 Number of intermediate stiffening
Increase = and double leaf door sets or single
elements otherwise
for single leaf doorsets
not possible without an additional test
A.3.28 Number of intermediate stiffening
Decrease = Possible –
elements
A.3.29 Stiffening elements Location = Possible –
A.3.30 Number of stiffening element fixing
Increase = Possible –
points
A.3.31 Number of stiffening element fixing
Decrease = Possible –
points
A.3.32 Overlap dimension of leaf edge rebate
Increase = Possible –
(between leaf and frame)
A.3.33 Overlap dimension of panel edge rebate
Increase = Possible –
(meeting edges)
A.3.34 Overlap dimension of leaf edge rebate
Decrease = Possible –
(between leaf and frame)
A.3.35 Overlap dimension of panel edge rebate
Decrease = Possible –
(meeting edges)
Influence of
variation on
Construction Parameter Variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required
performance
characteristic
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
A.3.36 Additional overlapping edge at the
Add = Possible –
bottom of the door leaf
A.3.37 Additional overlapping edge at the
Remove = Possible –
bottom of the door leaf
A.3.38 Leaf edge detail (between leaf and frame
Shape = Possible –
and meeting edges)
possible to interchange only between riveting and
screwing, providing that the centre distances are not
Alternative Additional test double for single
exceeded and the cross section dimension of the
A.3.39 Jointing/assembly technique (leaf edges,
(welding/rivetin > = < and double leaf doorsets or single
alternative (rivets / screws) is not smaller,
stiffening elements etc.) for leaf or frame
g/screwing) for single leaf doorsets
otherwise
not possible without an additional test
A.3.40 Dimension of intumescent seals (leaf or
Increase = Possible –
frame fitted)
A.3.41 Dimension of intumescent seals (leaf or
Decrease = Possible –
frame fitted)
Change of
A.3.42 Type of intumescent seals (leaf or frame
supplier/manufa = Possible –
fitted)
cturer
A.3.43 Type of intumescent seals (leaf or frame Alternative
= Possible –
fitted) material
Possible up to a maximum of 15 % in any cross
sectional dimension and up to a maximum of 10 %
A.3.44 Dimension of draught/smoke seals Additional test double for single
mass
(Euroclass A1); e.g. ceramic products Increase > = < and double leaf doorsets or single
(leaf or frame fitted) otherwise for single leaf doorsets doorset
not possible without an additional test
Influence of
variation on
Construction Parameter Variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required
performance
characteristic
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
A.3.45 Dimension of draught/smoke seals
(Euroclass A1); e.g. ceramic products Decrease = Possible –
(leaf or frame fitted)
Possible up to a maximum of 15 % in any cross
sectional dimension and up to a maximum of 10 %
Additional test double for single
A.3.46 Dimension of draught/smoke seals
mass
Increase > = < and double leaf doorsets or single
( otherwise for single leaf doorsets set
not possible without an additional test
A.3.47 Dimension of draught/smoke seals
Decrease = Possible –
( Change of
A.3.48 Type of draught/smoke seals (leaf or
supplier/manufa = Possible –
frame fitted)
cturer
Possible up to a maximum of 15 % in density
Additional test double for single
A.3.49 Type of draught/smoke seals (leaf or Alternative
= otherwise and double leaf doorsets or single
frame fitted) material
for single leaf doorsets
not possible without an additional test
A.4 Decorative and/or protective finishes
A.4.1 Paints without contribution to fire
Addition = Possible –
resistance (on leaf or frame)
A.4.2 Paints without contribution to fire
Interchange = Possible –
resistance (on leaf or frame)
A.4.3 Thickness of paints with positive
contribution to fire resistance (on leaf or Increase = Possible –
frame)
Influence of
variation on
Construction Parameter Variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required
performance
characteristic
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
A.4.4 Thickness of paints with positive
contribution to fire resistance (on leaf or Decrease = Possible –
frame)
change of
A.4.5 Type of paints with positive contribution
supplier/manufa = Possible –
to fire resistance (on leaf or frame)
cturer
A.4.6 Type of paints with positive contribution Alternative
= Possible –
to fire resistance (on leaf or frame) material
Possible in line with direct application according
Additional test double for single
toEN 1634–1
A.4.7 Decorative laminates and timber
Add = and double leaf doorsets or single
veneers on the face (on leaf or frame) otherwise
for single leaf doorsets
not possible without additional test
A.4.8 Decorative laminates and timber
Remove = Possible –
veneers on the face (on leaf or frame)
Possible providing primary gaps remain within the
A.4.9 Decorative laminates and timber Additional test single or double
tolerances given in EN 1634–1-otherwise
Add =
veneers on the edges (on leaf or frame) leaf doorset
not possible without additional test
Possible providing primary gaps remain within the
tolerances given in EN 1634–1-
A.4.10 Decorative laminates and timber Additional test double leaf
Add =
veneers on meeting edges otherwise doorset
not possible without additional test
A.4.11 Decorative laminates and timber
Remove = Possible –
veneers on the edges (on leaf or frame)
Influence of
variation on
Construction Parameter Variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required
performance
characteristic
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Change material
A.4.12 Types and thickness of decorative
content,
laminates and timber veneers on the = Possible –
increase,
face (on leaf or frame)
decrease
Change of material possible
Decrease possible
Change material
A.4.13 Types and thickness of decorative
content, increase possible providing primary gaps remain Additional test single or double
laminates and timber veneers on the =
increase, within the tolerances given in EN 1634–1 leaf doorset
edges (leaf to frame)
decrease
otherwise
not possible without additional test
Change of material possible
Decrease possible
Change material
A.4.14 Types and thickness of decorative
content, increase possible providing primary gaps remain Additional test double leaf
laminates and timber veneers on the =
increase, within the tolerances given in EN 1634–1 doorset
meeting edges
decrease
otherwise
not possible without additional test
A.4.15 Types of decorative laminates and
timber veneers on the face/edges (on Colour, pattern = Possible –
leaf or frame)
Possible providing no thicker than 1,5 mm and
providing the requirements of Annex B are fulfilled
A.4.16 Protective elements – face fixed (kick Additional test single or double
Add =
plates/push plates/armour plates) otherwise leaf doorset
not possible without an additional test
A.4.17 Protective elements – face fixed (kick
Remove = Possible –
plates/push plates/armour plates)
Influence of
variation on
Construction Parameter Variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required
performance
characteristic
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Selection
A.4.18 Attachment technique for elements
(adhesive/rivet/ = Possible –
added to doors
screw)
possible providing the requirements of Annex B are
fulfilled
Additional test single or double
A.4.19 Mouldings/profiles Add =
otherwise leaf doorset
not possible without an additional test
A.4.20 Mouldings/profiles Remove = Possible –
B  Door Frame
B.1 General
For intumescent/draught/smoke seals refer to section A.1
B.1.1 Threshold/sill/frame member to bottom
Add = Possible –
of door frame
B.1.2 Threshold/sill/frame member to bottom
Remove = Possible –
of door frame
B.1.3 Height of hatch door frame above floor Variation = Possible –
B.2 Materials and constructions
Possible providing the cross section detail at the
overlap/rebate position is retained and / or possible
Additional test double for single
to increase the overlap/rebate detail in line with the
B.2.1 Overall dimensions and shape Increase > = < and double leaf doorsets or single
increase of the thickness of the door leaf
for single leaf doorsets
otherwise
not possible without an additional test
Influence of
variation on
Construction Parameter Variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required
performance
characteristic
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Possible providing the cross section detail at the
overlap/rebate position is retained and / or possible
Additional test double for single
to decrease the overlap/rebate detail in line with
B.2.2 Overall dimensions and shape Decrease > = < and double leaf doorsets or single
the decrease of the thickness of the door leaf
for single leaf doorsets
otherwise
not possible without an additional test

Change of
supplier/manufa
cturer of
B.2.3 Type of infill material material with = Possible —
identical
composition and
properties
Possible providing tested without any infill material
Additional test double for single
Alternative
B.2.4 Type of infill material = otherwise and double leaf doorsets or single
material
for single leaf doorsets
not possible without an additional test
B.2.5 Thickness of metal Increase = Possible –
Additional test double for single
Possible up to a maximum of 25 % otherwise not
B.2.6 Thickness of metal Decrease = and double leaf doorsets or single
possible without additional test
for single leaf doorsets
B.2.7 Type of metal Mild to stainless = Possible –
B.2.8 Type of metal Stainless to mild = Possible –
C  Hardware
EN 16035 may provide information for the interchangeability of hardware.
Influence of
variation on
Construction Parameter Variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required
performance
characteristic
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
C.1 General
Possible providing the alternative hardware is of the
same type (internally mounted / mortised or
surface mounted) and complies with its relevant
product standard. The classification for category of
use, durability of latch action, door mass and closing
force according to EN 12209, prEN 15685 or
Additional test double for single
EN 14846 shall be in line with the intended
C.1.1 Latches/locks and strike plates Alternative = and double leaf doorsets or single
durability of self-closing classification of the doorset
for single leaf doorsets
and comply with the mass of the door.
The type of fixings shall not be changed and the
number of fixings shall not be reduced
otherwise
not possible without an additional test
C.1.2 Number of latches/locks and strike
Increase  Possible –
plates
possible providing one latch/lock is retained
Additional test double for single
C.1.3 Number of latches/locks and strike
Decrease = otherwise and double leaf doorsets or single
plates
for single leaf doorsets
not possible without an additional test
Influence of
variation on
Construction Parameter Variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required
performance
characteristic
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Possible providing the alternative hardware is of the
same type (internally mounted / mortised or
surface mounted) and complies with its relevant
product standard. The classification for category of
use, durability of latch action, door mass and closing
Exchange single
force according to EN 12209, prEN 15685 or
Additional test double for single
latch/lock to
EN 14846 shall be in line with the intended
C.1.4 Locking system = and double leaf doorsets or single
multipoint
durability of self-closing classification of the doorset
for single leaf doorsets
locking system
and comply with the mass of the door.
The type of fixings shall not be changed and the
number of fixings shall not be reduced
otherwise
not possible without an additional test
Exchange
multipoint
C.1.5 Locking syst
...