ISO/IEC TR 19782:2006
(Main)Information technology — Automatic identification and data capture techniques — Effects of gloss and low substrate opacity on reading of bar code symbols
Information technology — Automatic identification and data capture techniques — Effects of gloss and low substrate opacity on reading of bar code symbols
Users of bar code systems have experienced problems with poor read rates. These read rate problems can sometimes be attributed to spectral gloss from either the substrate or the image or both. In many bar code applications, the position and orientation of the scanner relative to the bar code symbol can be directly controlled by the operator. In these applications, the presentation of the bar code symbol to the reader will usually be manipulated by the operator to achieve optimal performance. However, in bar code applications using fixed position automated reading systems, the ability to control bar code symbol presentation to the reader and achieve optimised performance is diminished. Due to the very high volume of bar code marked items in today's supply chain, even a small reduction in read rate can represent significant logistics problems. Traditional gloss measurements are made at the angle that maximises specular reflection and do not provide results that can be used to predict performance at other angles. Moreover, many laser scanners use a retro-collective optical system that would correspond to a gloss meter using a zero degree angle of incidence, which is not commonly available. Present international bar code quality standards, such as ISO/IEC 15416, do not factor the impact of gloss from either the bar code image or substrate into quality grade ratings. Thus a Grade '4' label may be high gloss or low gloss. Low gloss labels and images tend to work well in all scanning systems, while high gloss labels and images may not. In the absence of industry specifications, users have no convenient reference to use when requesting suppliers to provide labels that will work well in their systems. ISO/IEC TR 19782:2006 provides a method for the measurement of gloss that will permit users to judge if the bar code symbol and substrate are suitably matched for the reading system used in their application. Low opacity of the substrate can degrade system performance because it may reduce the apparent contrast of the bar code symbol. ISO/IEC TR 19782:2006 therefore provides means for measuring the substrate opacity. The test method described in ISO/IEC TR 19782:2006 provides a means for the production of reproducible measurements. In specific applications, it may be necessary to correlate these measurements to practical performance. For example, a substrate backed by dark liquid may exhibit lower opacity than when measured dry. ISO/IEC TR 19782:2006 gives guidelines to deal with the effects of substrate gloss and/or low opacity on the performance of bar code symbols when scanned by reading and verification systems. It defines methods of measurement for gloss and opacity; it identifies conditions and values that present a risk of reading problems and provides recommendations to users on the specification of substrates and the set-up of scanning systems to minimize these problems. It also addresses the relationship between verification results and read performance when either or both of the factors are present. ISO/IEC TR 19782:2006 is intended for those who specify or implement labelling systems and those involved in the reading of bar code symbols on packages, components and other carriers of bar code symbols.
Technologies de l'information — Techniques automatiques d'identification et de capture des données — Effets de la brillance et de la faible opacité du substrat sur la lecture des symboles de code à barres
General Information
Standards Content (Sample)
TECHNICAL ISO/IEC
REPORT TR
First edition
2006-06-01
Information technology — Automatic
identification and data capture
techniques — Effects of gloss and low
substrate opacity on reading of bar code
symbols
Technologies de l'information — Techniques d'identification
automatique et de capture des données — Effets de la brillance et de la
faible opacité du substrat sur la lecture des symboles de code à barres
Reference number
©
ISO/IEC 2006
PDF disclaimer
This PDF file may contain embedded typefaces. In accordance with Adobe's licensing policy, this file may be printed or viewed but
shall not be edited unless the typefaces which are embedded are licensed to and installed on the computer performing the editing. In
downloading this file, parties accept therein the responsibility of not infringing Adobe's licensing policy. The ISO Central Secretariat
accepts no liability in this area.
Adobe is a trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated.
Details of the software products used to create this PDF file can be found in the General Info relative to the file; the PDF-creation
parameters were optimized for printing. Every care has been taken to ensure that the file is suitable for use by ISO member bodies. In
the unlikely event that a problem relating to it is found, please inform the Central Secretariat at the address given below.
© ISO/IEC 2006
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means,
electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from either ISO at the address below or
ISO's member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
Case postale 56 • CH-1211 Geneva 20
Tel. + 41 22 749 01 11
Fax + 41 22 749 09 47
E-mail copyright@iso.org
Web www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii © ISO/IEC 2006 – All rights reserved
Contents Page
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions. 1
4 Symbols and abbreviated terms . 2
5 Measurement procedures . 2
5.1 Effects of gloss and/or low opacity . 2
5.2 Measurement of gloss. 3
5.3 Measurement of opacity. 4
6 Test reports . 5
6.1 Test report for gloss. 5
6.2 Test report for opacity. 5
7 Impact of gloss and opacity effects on verification . 5
Annex A (informative) Example of gloss measurement technique. 7
A.1 General description of set-up. 7
A.2 Test fixture. 8
A.3 Example profiles – substrate and image. 8
A.4 Comparison of TAPPI T 425 Gloss measurements with gloss profile measurements. 13
Annex B (informative) Reporting of gloss measurements. 14
B.1 Recommendation for gloss profile measurement. 14
B.2 Example of scan rate profile. 15
Annex C (informative) Opacity measurement. 17
C.1 Test Set-Up . 17
C.2 Measurement of Opacity for purposes of gloss determination . 17
© ISO/IEC 2006 – All rights reserved iii
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) and IEC (the International Electrotechnical
Commission) form the specialized system for worldwide standardization. National bodies that are members of
ISO or IEC participate in the development of International Standards through technical committees
established by the respective organization to deal with particular fields of technical activity. ISO and IEC
technical committees collaborate in fields of mutual interest. Other international organizations, governmental
and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO and IEC, also take part in the work. In the field of information
technology, ISO and IEC have established a joint technical committee, ISO/IEC JTC 1.
International Standards are drafted in accordance with the rules given in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2.
The main task of the joint technical committee is to prepare International Standards. Draft International
Standards adopted by the joint technical committee are circulated to national bodies for voting. Publication as
an International Standard requires approval by at least 75 % of the national bodies casting a vote.
In exceptional circumstances, the joint technical committee may propose the publication of a Technical Report
of one of the following types:
— type 1, when the required support cannot be obtained for the publication of an International Standard,
despite repeated efforts;
— type 2, when the subject is still under technical development or where for any other reason there is the
future but not immediate possibility of an agreement on an International Standard;
— type 3, when the joint technical committee has collected data of a different kind from that which is
normally published as an International Standard (“state of the art”, for example).
Technical Reports of types 1 and 2 are subject to review within three years of publication, to decide whether
they can be transformed into International Standards. Technical Reports of type 3 do not necessarily have to
be reviewed until the data they provide are considered to be no longer valid or useful.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent
rights. ISO and IEC shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
ISO/IEC TR 19782, which is a Technical Report of type 3, was prepared by Joint Technical Committee
ISO/IEC JTC 1, Information technology, Subcommittee SC 31, Automatic identification and data capture
techniques.
iv © ISO/IEC 2006 – All rights reserved
Introduction
Users of bar code systems have experienced problems with poor read rates. These read rate problems can
sometimes be attributed to spectral gloss from either the substrate or the image or both.
In many bar code applications, the position and orientation of the scanner relative to the bar code symbol can
be directly controlled by the operator. In these applications, the presentation of the bar code symbol to the
reader will usually be manipulated by the operator to achieve optimal performance. However, in bar code
applications using fixed position automated reading systems, the ability to control bar code symbol
presentation to the reader and achieve optimised performance is diminished.
Due to the very high volume of bar code marked items in today's supply chain, even a small reduction in read
rate can represent significant logistics problems.
Traditional gloss measurements are made at the angle that maximises specular reflection and do not provide
results that can be used to predict performance at other angles. Moreover, many laser scanners use a retro-
collective optical system that would correspond to a gloss meter using a zero degree angle of incidence,
which is not commonly available.
Present international bar code quality standards, such as ISO/IEC 15416, do not factor the impact of gloss
from either the bar code image or substrate into quality grade ratings. Thus a Grade "4" label may be high
gloss or low gloss. Low gloss labels and images tend to work well in all scanning systems, while high gloss
labels and images may not. In the absence of industry specifications, users have no convenient reference to
use when requesting suppliers to provide labels that will work well in their systems. This Technical Report
provides a method for the measurement of gloss that will permit users to judge if the bar code symbol and
substrate are suitably matched for the reading system used in their application.
Low opacity of the substrate can degrade system performance because it may reduce the apparent contrast
of the bar code symbol. This Technical Report therefore provides means for measuring the substrate opacity.
The test method described in this Technical Report provides a means for the production of reproducible
measurements. In specific applications, it may be necessary to correlate these measurements to practical
performance. For example, a substrate backed by dark liquid may exhibit lower opacity than when measured
dry.
© ISO/IEC 2006 – All rights reserved v
TECHNICAL REPORT ISO/IEC TR 19782:2006(E)
Information technology — Automatic identification and data
capture techniques — Effects of gloss and low substrate
opacity on reading of bar code symbols
1 Scope
This Technical Report gives guidelines to deal with the effects of substrate gloss and/or low opacity on the
performance of bar code symbols when scanned by reading and verification systems.
This Technical Report defines methods of measurement for gloss and opacity; it identifies conditions and
values that present a risk of reading problems and provides recommendations to users on the specification of
substrates and the set-up of scanning systems to minimize these problems. It also addresses the relationship
between verification results and read performance when either or both of the factors are present.
This document is intended for those who specify or implement labelling systems and those involved in the
reading of bar code symbols on packages, components and other carriers of bar code symbols.
2 Normative references
The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated
references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced
document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO/IEC 19762-1, Information technology — Automatic identification and data capture (AIDC) techniques —
Harmonized vocabulary — Part 1: General terms relating to AIDC
ISO/IEC 19762-2, Information technology — Automatic identification and data capture (AIDC) techniques —
Harmonized vocabulary — Part 2: Optically readable media (ORM)
ISO/IEC 15415, Information technology — Automatic identification and data capture techniques — Bar code
print quality test specification — Two-dimensional symbols
ISO/IEC 15416, Information technology — Automatic identification and data capture techniques — Bar code
print quality test specification — Linear symbols
TAPPI T 425 om-01, Opacity of paper (15/d geometry, illuminant A/2°, 89 % reflectance backing and paper
backing)
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in ISO/IEC 19762-1, ISO/IEC 19762-2 and
the following apply.
3.1
coaxial
pertaining to scanning systems in which the path of illumination from the light source to the symbol and the
path of collected light from the symbol are in the same axis
© ISO/IEC 2006 – All rights reserved 1
3.2
image
printed part of the symbol as opposed to the background (“printed” includes any method of creating a mark on
the substrate)
3.3
receiver
part of the optical system that collects the reflected light, focuses it onto the photodetector and outputs an
electrical signal proportional to the intensity of the light
4 Symbols and abbreviated terms
VM Volt Meter
mW Milliwatts
TT Thermal Transfer
TD Thermal Direct
λ wavelength
CTD Coated Thermal Direct
UNCTD Uncoated Thermal Direct
SUB Substrate
5 Measurement procedures
5.1 Effects of gloss and/or low opacity
5.1.1 Gloss
The performance of scanning equipment is highly dependent on the detection of adequate contrast between
the image and the substrate. Performance is degraded when an image or substrate, adversely affects the
Symbol Contrast due to its gloss. Note that Symbol Contrast can also be degraded by a high gloss low-opacity
substrate(see 5.1.2).
In coaxial reading systems, specular reflection can cause a problem when the incident angle is close to
normal with the result that the reflected light captured by the reader includes specular reflection. However, the
range of angles over which significant specular reflection occurs depends on characteristics of the material,
such as its gloss.
Materials with relatively high gloss will produce a higher amplitude of specular reflection over a narrower angle,
compared with matte materials. Matte materials tend to produce lower amplitude of specular reflection over a
wider angle.
In order for adequate contrast to be manifest, over reading angles that
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.