Standard Specification for Electrodeposited Coatings of Lead and Lead-Tin Alloys on Steel and Ferrous Alloys

ABSTRACT
This specification establishes the requirements for electrodeposited lead and lead-tin alloy coatings on steel and ferrous alloys. Sheets, strips, or wires in the unfabricated form are not covered here. Coatings shall be sampled, tested, and conform accordingly to specified requirements as to thickness, adhesion, corrosion resistance, hydrogen embrittlement, composition, workmanship, finish, and appearance.
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
7.1 Electrodeposits of lead and lead-tin alloys on steel and ferrous alloys are produced where it is desired to obtain atmospheric corrosion resistance. Deposits of lead and lead-tin alloys on steel have shown to have excellent corrosion protective qualities in atmospheric exposure, especially when under-coated by a thin deposit of copper (or nickel). Applications of lead and lead-tin alloy deposits include the following: protection from dilute sulfuric acid; lining of brine refrigeration tanks; chemical apparatus; and parts for storage batteries; and for coating bearing surfaces. In this last application, lead is electroplated alone, or as an alloy and coated with another metal, such as indium. The indium may be diffused into the lead or lead alloy by heat treatment. See Appendix X1.
SCOPE
1.1 This specification covers the requirements for electrodeposited coatings of lead and lead-tin alloys on steel and ferrous alloys. The coatings of lead-tin alloys are those that range in tin content up to but not exceeding 15 mass %. The coatings ranging between 3 and 15 mass % in tin content are known also as “terne” metallic electrodeposits.  
1.2 This specification does not apply to sheet, strip, or wire in the unfabricated form.  
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.4 The following precautionary caveat pertains only to the test method portion, Section 11, of this specification: This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
28-Feb-2015
Drafting Committee
Current Stage
Ref Project

Buy Standard

Technical specification
ASTM B200-85(2015) - Standard Specification for Electrodeposited Coatings of Lead and Lead-Tin Alloys on Steel and Ferrous Alloys
English language
6 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview
Technical specification
REDLINE ASTM B200-85(2015) - Standard Specification for Electrodeposited Coatings of Lead and Lead-Tin Alloys on Steel and Ferrous Alloys
English language
6 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation:B200 −85 (Reapproved 2015)
Standard Specification for
Electrodeposited Coatings of Lead and Lead-Tin Alloys on
Steel and Ferrous Alloys
This standard is issued under the fixed designation B200; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision.Anumber in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the U.S. Department of Defense.
1. Scope B339Specification for Pig Tin
B374Terminology Relating to Electroplating
1.1 Thisspecificationcoverstherequirementsforelectrode-
B487Test Method for Measurement of Metal and Oxide
positedcoatingsofleadandlead-tinalloysonsteelandferrous
Coating Thickness by Microscopical Examination of
alloys.Thecoatingsoflead-tinalloysarethosethatrangeintin
Cross Section
content up to but not exceeding 15 mass%. The coatings
B499Test Method for Measurement of CoatingThicknesses
rangingbetween3and15mass%intincontentareknownalso
by the Magnetic Method: Nonmagnetic Coatings on
as “terne” metallic electrodeposits.
Magnetic Basis Metals
1.2 This specification does not apply to sheet, strip, or wire
B504Test Method for Measurement of Thickness of Metal-
in the unfabricated form.
lic Coatings by the Coulometric Method
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as B507Practice for Design ofArticles to Be Electroplated on
Racks
standard. No other units of measurement are included in this
standard. B567Test Method for Measurement of Coating Thickness
by the Beta Backscatter Method
1.4 The following precautionary caveat pertains only to the
B568Test Method for Measurement of Coating Thickness
test method portion, Section 11, of this specification: This
by X-Ray Spectrometry
standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns,
B571Practice for Qualitative Adhesion Testing of Metallic
if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user
Coatings
of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health
B602Test Method for Attribute Sampling of Metallic and
practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limita-
Inorganic Coatings
tions prior to use.
B697Guide for Selection of Sampling Plans for Inspection
of Electrodeposited Metallic and Inorganic Coatings
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
3. Terminology
B117Practice for Operating Salt Spray (Fog) Apparatus
3.1 Definitions—Definitions of the terms used in this speci-
B183Practice for Preparation of Low-Carbon Steel for
fication are in accordance with Terminology B374.
Electroplating
B242Guide for Preparation of High-Carbon Steel for Elec-
4. Classification
troplating
B320Practice for Preparation of Iron Castings for Electro- 4.1 The coating designation shall comprise the following:
plating
4.1.1 The chemical symbol for the basis metal.
B322Guide for Cleaning Metals Prior to Electroplating 4.1.2 The chemical symbol for the undercoating of copper
or nickel, if used.
4.1.3 The chemical symbol Pb representing lead or the
This specification is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee B08 on
symbolPbSnforthelead-tinalloy.Whentinispresent,thetin
Metallic and Inorganic Coatings and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee
content of the coating will appear before the symbol Sn. For
B08.06 on Soft Metals.
example, Pb 5 Sn refers to a coating having the minimum
Current edition approved March 1, 2015. Published April 2015. Originally
composition 5 mass% tin, remainder lead.
approved in 1970. Last previous edition approved in 2009 as B200–85(2009).
DOI: 10.1520/B0200-85R15.
4.1.4 A number indicating the minimum thickness of the
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
coatinginmicrometres(µm).Thisminimumthicknessshallbe
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
6, 12, 25, or 40 µm, and shall apply to all significant surfaces
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
the ASTM website. specified in 8.2.2 and 8.3.1.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
B200−85 (2015)
4.2 Examples: operations, preliminary to electroplating of specimens, includ-
4.2.1 Fe-Pb-5-Sn-40 represents a lead-tin alloy coating ingthespacing,platingmedia,bathagitation,andtemperature,
having5mass%tincontent,remainderlead,onaferrousbasis inrespecttootherobjectsbeingelectroplated,shallcorrespond
metal. The thickness is 40 µm minimum. as nearly as possible to those affecting the significant surfaces
4.2.2 Fe-Cu-Pb-6 represents a lead coating on a ferrous ofthearticlesrepresented.Unlessaneedcanbedemonstrated,
basis metal with a copper strike. The thickness is 6 µm separately prepared specimens shall not be used in place of
minimum. production items for nondestructive and visual examinations.
6.2 Thickness and Adhesion Specimens— If separate speci-
5. Sampling
mens for thickness and adhesion tests are required, they shall
5.1 Lot—An inspection lot is defined as a collection of
be strips approximately 25 mm wide, 100 mm long, and 1 mm
finished articles that are of the same kind, that have been
thick.
produced to the same specification, that have been coated by a
6.3 Corrosion Resistance Specimens— If separate speci-
single supplier at one time or at approximately the same time
mens for corrosion resistance tests are required, they shall be
under essentially identical conditions, and that are submitted
panels not less than 150 mm long, 100 mm wide, and
for acceptance or rejection as a group.
approximately 1 mm thick.
5.2 Selection—ArandomsampleofthesizerequiredbyTest
6.4 Hydrogen Embrittlement Specimens— If specimens are
Method B602 shall be selected from the inspection lot (see
required, the configuration shall be that specified by the
5.1). The articles in the lot shall be inspected for conformance
purchaser.
to the requirements of this specification and the lot shall be
classifiedasconformingornonconformingtoeachrequirement
7. Significance and Use
according to the criteria of the sampling plans in Test Method
B602. 7.1 Electrodeposits of lead and lead-tin alloys on steel and
ferrous alloys are produced where it is desired to obtain
NOTE1—TestMethodB602containsthreesamplingplansthataretobe
atmosphericcorrosionresistance.Depositsofleadandlead-tin
used with nondestructive test methods and a fourth to be used with
alloys on steel have shown to have excellent corrosion protec-
destructivetestmethods.Thethreemethodsfornondestructivetestsdiffer
inthequalityleveltheyrequireoftheproduct.TestMethodB602requires
tive qualities in atmospheric exposure, especially when under-
use of the plan with the intermediate quality level unless the purchaser
coated by a thin deposit of copper (or nickel).Applications of
specifies otherwise. The purchaser should compare the plans with his
lead and lead-tin alloy deposits include the following: protec-
needsandstatewhichplanistobeused.IftheplansinTestMethodB602
tion from dilute sulfuric acid; lining of brine refrigeration
do not serve the needs, additional ones are given in Guide B697.
NOTE 2—When both destructive and nondestructive tests exist for the tanks; chemical apparatus; and parts for storage batteries; and
measurement of a characteristic, the purchaser needs to state which is to
for coating bearing surfaces. In this last application, lead is
be used so that the proper sampling plan is selected. Also, a test may
electroplated alone, or as an alloy and coated with another
destroy the coating in a noncritical area; or, although it destroys the
metal, such as indium. The indium may be diffused into the
coating, the tested article might be reclaimed by stripping and recoating.
lead or lead alloy by heat treatment. See Appendix X1.
The purchaser needs to state whether the test is to be considered
destructive or nondestructive.
8. Ordering Information
5.3 Separate Specimens—If separate specimens are to be
used to represent the finished articles in a test, the specimens
8.1 Whenorderingarticlestobeelectroplatedinaccordance
shall be of the nature, size, number, and be processed as
with this specification, the purchaser shall state the coating
required in 6.1, 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4.
designation (see Section 4), the minimum thickness on signifi-
cantsurfaces,inadditiontotheASTMdesignationnumberand
6. Specimen Preparation
year of issue.
6.1 Electroplated Parts or Separate Specimens—When the
8.2 If necessary, the purchaser shall include on his part,
electroplated parts are of such form, shape, size, and value as
drawings, or purchase order the following:
to prohibit use thereof, or are not readily adaptable to a test
8.2.1 Electroplating application to high-strength steel, if
specifiedherein,orwhendestructivetestsofsmalllotsizesare
specified (see 9.2.2).
required, the test shall be made by the use of separate
8.2.2 Location of significant surfaces, to be shown on part
specimens plated concurrently with the articles represented.
drawing, or by the provision of a suitably marked sample.
The separate specimens shall be of a basis metal equivalent to
8.2.3 Hydrogen embrittlement test, if required (see 6.4).
that of the articles represented. “Equivalent” basis metal
8.2.4 Sample size for inspection, if other than specified (see
incudes chemical composition, grade, condition, and finish of
Section 5).
surface prior to electroplating. For example, a cold-rolled steel
8.2.5 Supplementary requirements, if applicable (see
surface should not be used to represent a hot-rolled steel
Supplementary Requirements).
surface.Duetotheimpracticalityofforgingorcastingseparate
8.2.6 Separate test specimens, if permitted (see 6.1).
test specimens, hot-rolled steel specimens may be used to
8.2.7 Certification, if required (see Section 13).
representforgedandcast-steelarticles.Theseparatespecimens
mayalsobecutfromscrapcastingswhenferrousalloycastings 8.3 The manufacturer of the basis metal parts should pro-
are being electroplated. These separate specimens shall be vide the supplier of the coating facility, with the following
introduced into a lot at regular intervals before the cleaning data:
B200−85 (2015)
8.3.1 Hardness or tensile strength of steel parts (see 9.2.2 necessary, the significant surfaces shall be indicated on the
and 9.2.3). drawings of the parts, or by the provision of suitably marked
8.3.2 Heat treatment for stress relief, whether or not it has samples.
been performed or is required.
NOTE4—Whensignificantsurfacesareinvolvedonwhichthespecified
thickness of finish cannot be readily controlled, it will be necessary to
9. Coating Requirements
apply greater thickness on the more accessible surfaces, to use special
racking, or both. The thickness requirements of this specification are
9.1 Composition—The coating compositions shall be as
minimum, (see Table 2). Variation in the finish thickness from point to
specified in Table 1.
point on a coated article is inherent in electroplating.Therefore, the finish
thickness will have to exceed the specified value at some points on the
9.2 Process—Lead and lead-tin alloy coatings shall be
significant surfaces to ensure that it equals or exceeds the specified value
producedbyelectrodepositioninaqueoussolutionofsalts.For
at all points. In most cases, the average finish thickness on an article will
the preparation of ferrous metal surfaces necessary to assure
be greater than the specified value; how much greater is largely deter-
good deposit, adhesion, and quality, see Practices B183, B242,
mined by the shape of the article (see Practice B507) and the character-
istics of the plating process. In addition, the average finish thickness on
B320, and B322.
articleswillvaryfromarticletoarticlewithinaproductionlot,Therefore,
9.2.1 A copper or nickel strike, 2.5 µm thick, may be
if all of the articles in a production lot are to meet the thickness
employed and is desirable (see X1.1.2).
requirement,theaveragefinishthicknessfortheproductionlotasawhole
9.2.2 Steel parts with ultimate tensile strengths greater than
will be greater than the average necessary to assure that a single article
1050 Mpa (approximately 32 HRC) and that have been meets the requirement.
machined, ground, cold-formed, or cold-straightened shall be
9.5 Corrosion Resistance—Lead and lead-tin coatings shall
stressrelievedbeforeprocessingbyheattreatingfor5hat190
show neither corrosion products of lead (or lead-tin) nor basis
6 15°C. Steel parts having an ultimate tensile strength greater
metal corrosion products at the end of the test period, (see
than 2350 MPa (approximately 50 HRC) shall not be coated
Table 2), when tested by continuous exposure to salt spray in
with lead or lead-tin alloys by electrodeposition.
accordance with 11.4. The appearance of corrosion products
9.2.3 Steel parts with ultimate tensile strengths greater than
visible to the unaided eye at normal reading distance shall be
1125 MPa (approximately 35 HRC) and greater, shall be heat
cause for rejection except that corrosion products at the edges
treated within 4 h after plating to remove hydrogen embrittle-
of specimens shall not constitute failure.
ment. The heat treatment shall be at least for3hat190 6
NOTE5—Corrosionisdefinedasthepresenceofmorethan66rustspots
15°C.
persquaremetre,ormorethantworustspotsinanarealessthan3square
9.2.4 Defects and variations in appearance in the finish that
decimetres, or rust spots larger than 1.6 mm in diameter.
arise from surface conditions of the substrate (for example,
scratches, pores, roll marks, inclusions, etc.) and that persist in 10. Workmanship, Finish, and Appearance
the finish despite the observance of good metal-finishing
10.1 Thesurfaceoftheelectroplatedarticleshallbeuniform
practices shall not be cause for rejection.
in appearance and free of visible coating defects, such as
NOTE 3—Applied finishes generally perform better in service when the blisters, pits, roughness, nodules, burning, cracks, or unplated
substrate over which they are applied is smooth and free of torn metal,
areas, and other defects that will affect the function of the
inclusions, pores, and other defects. It is recommended that the specifi-
coating. However, superficial staining that results from rinsing
cations covering the unfinished products provide limits for these defects.
or slight discoloration from any drying or baking operation to
Ametalfinishercanoftenremovedefectsthroughspecialtreatmentssuch
relieve hydrogen embrittlement, shall not be cause for rejec-
as grinding, polishing, abrasive blasting, chemical etching, and electrop-
olishing. However, these are not normal in the treatment s
...


This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: B200 − 85 (Reapproved 2009) B200 − 85 (Reapproved 2015)
Standard Specification for
Electrodeposited Coatings of Lead and Lead-Tin Alloys on
Steel and Ferrous Alloys
This standard is issued under the fixed designation B200; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the U.S. Department of Defense.
1. Scope
1.1 This specification covers the requirements for electrodeposited coatings of lead and lead-tin alloys on steel and ferrous
alloys. The coatings of lead-tin alloys are those that range in tin content up to but not exceeding 15 mass %. The coatings ranging
between 3 and 15 mass % in tin content are known also as “terne” metallic electrodeposits.
1.2 This specification does not apply to sheet, strip, or wire in the unfabricated form.
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.
1.4 The following precautionary caveat pertains only to the test method portion, Section 11, of this specification:This standard
does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this
standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
B117 Practice for Operating Salt Spray (Fog) Apparatus
B183 Practice for Preparation of Low-Carbon Steel for Electroplating
B242 Guide for Preparation of High-Carbon Steel for Electroplating
B320 Practice for Preparation of Iron Castings for Electroplating
B322 Guide for Cleaning Metals Prior to Electroplating
B339 Specification for Pig Tin
B374 Terminology Relating to Electroplating
B487 Test Method for Measurement of Metal and Oxide Coating Thickness by Microscopical Examination of Cross Section
B499 Test Method for Measurement of Coating Thicknesses by the Magnetic Method: Nonmagnetic Coatings on Magnetic Basis
Metals
B504 Test Method for Measurement of Thickness of Metallic Coatings by the Coulometric Method
B507 Practice for Design of Articles to Be Electroplated on Racks
B567 Test Method for Measurement of Coating Thickness by the Beta Backscatter Method
B568 Test Method for Measurement of Coating Thickness by X-Ray Spectrometry
B571 Practice for Qualitative Adhesion Testing of Metallic Coatings
B602 Test Method for Attribute Sampling of Metallic and Inorganic Coatings
B697 Guide for Selection of Sampling Plans for Inspection of Electrodeposited Metallic and Inorganic Coatings
3. Terminology
3.1 Definitions—Definitions of the terms used in this specification are in accordance with Terminology B374.
4. Classification
4.1 The coating designation shall comprise the following:
4.1.1 The chemical symbol for the basis metal.
This specification is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee B08 on Metallic and Inorganic Coatings and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee B08.06 on Soft
Metals.
Current edition approved Sept. 1, 2009March 1, 2015. Published December 2009April 2015. Originally approved in 1970. Last previous edition approved in 20042009
as B200 – 85 (2004).(2009). DOI: 10.1520/B0200-85R09.10.1520/B0200-85R15.
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
B200 − 85 (2015)
4.1.2 The chemical symbol for the undercoating of copper or nickel, if used.
4.1.3 The chemical symbol Pb representing lead or the symbol Pb Sn for the lead-tin alloy. When tin is present, the tin content
of the coating will appear before the symbol Sn. For example, Pb 5 Sn refers to a coating having the minimum composition 5
mass % tin, remainder lead.
4.1.4 A number indicating the minimum thickness of the coating in micrometres (μm). This minimum thickness shall be 6, 12,
25, or 40 μm, and shall apply to all significant surfaces specified in 8.2.2 and 8.3.1.
4.2 Examples:
4.2.1 Fe-Pb-5-Sn-40 represents a lead-tin alloy coating having 5 mass % tin content, remainder lead, on a ferrous basis metal.
The thickness is 40 μm minimum.
4.2.2 Fe-Cu-Pb-6 represents a lead coating on a ferrous basis metal with a copper strike. The thickness is 6 μm minimum.
5. Sampling
5.1 Lot—An inspection lot is defined as a collection of finished articles that are of the same kind, that have been produced to
the same specification, that have been coated by a single supplier at one time or at approximately the same time under essentially
identical conditions, and that are submitted for acceptance or rejection as a group.
5.2 Selection—A random sample of the size required by Test Method B602 shall be selected from the inspection lot (see 5.1).
The articles in the lot shall be inspected for conformance to the requirements of this specification and the lot shall be classified
as conforming or nonconforming to each requirement according to the criteria of the sampling plans in Test Method B602.
NOTE 1—Test Method B602 contains three sampling plans that are to be used with nondestructive test methods and a fourth to be used with destructive
test methods. The three methods for nondestructive tests differ in the quality level they require of the product. Test Method B602 requires use of the plan
with the intermediate quality level unless the purchaser specifies otherwise. The purchaser should compare the plans with his needs and state which plan
is to be used. If the plans in Test Method B602 do not serve the needs, additional ones are given in Guide B697.
NOTE 2—When both destructive and nondestructive tests exist for the measurement of a characteristic, the purchaser needs to state which is to be used
so that the proper sampling plan is selected. Also, a test may destroy the coating in a noncritical area; or, although it destroys the coating, the tested article
might be reclaimed by stripping and recoating. The purchaser needs to state whether the test is to be considered destructive or nondestructive.
5.3 Separate Specimens—If separate specimens are to be used to represent the finished articles in a test, the specimens shall be
of the nature, size, number, and be processed as required in 6.1, 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4.
6. Specimen Preparation
6.1 Electroplated Parts or Separate Specimens—When the electroplated parts are of such form, shape, size, and value as to
prohibit use thereof, or are not readily adaptable to a test specified herein, or when destructive tests of small lot sizes are required,
the test shall be made by the use of separate specimens plated concurrently with the articles represented. The separate specimens
shall be of a basis metal equivalent to that of the articles represented. “Equivalent” basis metal incudes chemical composition,
grade, condition, and finish of surface prior to electroplating. For example, a cold-rolled steel surface should not be used to
represent a hot-rolled steel surface. Due to the impracticality of forging or casting separate test specimens, hot-rolled steel
specimens may be used to represent forged and cast-steel articles. The separate specimens may also be cut from scrap castings
when ferrous alloy castings are being electroplated. These separate specimens shall be introduced into a lot at regular intervals
before the cleaning operations, preliminary to electroplating of specimens, including the spacing, plating media, bath agitation, and
temperature, in respect to other objects being electroplated, shall correspond as nearly as possible to those affecting the significant
surfaces of the articles represented. Unless a need can be demonstrated, separately prepared specimens shall not be used in place
of production items for nondestructive and visual examinations.
6.2 Thickness and Adhesion Specimens— If separate specimens for thickness and adhesion tests are required, they shall be strips
approximately 25 mm wide, 100 mm long, and 1 mm thick.
6.3 Corrosion Resistance Specimens— If separate specimens for corrosion resistance tests are required, they shall be panels not
less than 150 mm long, 100 mm wide, and approximately 1 mm thick.
6.4 Hydrogen Embrittlement Specimens— If specimens are required, the configuration shall be that specified by the purchaser.
7. Significance and Use
7.1 Electrodeposits of lead and lead-tin alloys on steel and ferrous alloys are produced where it is desired to obtain atmospheric
corrosion resistance. Deposits of lead and lead-tin alloys on steel have shown to have excellent corrosion protective qualities in
atmospheric exposure, especially when under-coated by a thin deposit of copper (or nickel). Applications of lead and lead-tin alloy
deposits include the following: protection from dilute sulfuric acid; lining of brine refrigeration tanks; chemical apparatus; and
parts for storage batteries; and for coating bearing surfaces. In this last application, lead is electroplated alone, or as an alloy and
coated with another metal, such as indium. The indium may be diffused into the lead or lead alloy by heat treatment. See Appendix
X1.
B200 − 85 (2015)
8. Ordering Information
8.1 When ordering articles to be electroplated in accordance with this specification, the purchaser shall state the coating
designation (see Section 4), the minimum thickness on significant surfaces, in addition to the ASTM designation number and year
of issue.
8.2 If necessary, the purchaser shall include on his part, drawings, or purchase order the following:
8.2.1 Electroplating application to high-strength steel, if specified (see 9.2.2).
8.2.2 Location of significant surfaces, to be shown on part drawing, or by the provision of a suitably marked sample.
8.2.3 Hydrogen embrittlement test, if required (see 6.4).
8.2.4 Sample size for inspection, if other than specified (see Section 5).
8.2.5 Supplementary requirements, if applicable (see Supplementary Requirements).
8.2.6 Separate test specimens, if permitted (see 6.1).
8.2.7 Certification, if required (see Section 13).
8.3 The manufacturer of the basis metal parts should provide the supplier of the coating facility, with the following data:
8.3.1 Hardness or tensile strength of steel parts (see 9.2.2 and 9.2.3).
8.3.2 Heat treatment for stress relief, whether or not it has been performed or is required.
9. Coating Requirements
9.1 Composition—The coating compositions shall be as specified in Table 1.
9.2 Process—Lead and lead-tin alloy coatings shall be produced by electrodeposition in aqueous solution of salts. For the
preparation of ferrous metal surfaces necessary to assure good deposit, adhesion, and quality, see Practices B183, B242, B320, and
B322.
9.2.1 A copper or nickel strike, 2.5 μm thick, may be employed and is desirable (see X1.1.2).
9.2.2 Steel parts with ultimate tensile strengths greater than 1050 Mpa (approximately 32 HRC) and that have been machined,
ground, cold-formed, or cold-straightened shall be stress relieved before processing by heat treating for 5 h at 190 6 15°C. Steel
parts having an ultimate tensile strength greater than 2350 MPa (approximately 50 HRC) shall not be coated with lead or lead-tin
alloys by electrodeposition.
9.2.3 Steel parts with ultimate tensile strengths greater than 1125 MPa (approximately 35 HRC) and greater, shall be heat treated
within 4 h after plating to remove hydrogen embrittlement. The heat treatment shall be at least for 3 h at 190 6 15°C.
9.2.4 Defects and variations in appearance in the finish that arise from surface conditions of the substrate (for example,
scratches, pores, roll marks, inclusions, etc.) and that persist in the finish despite the observance of good metal-finishing practices
shall not be cause for rejection.
NOTE 3—Applied finishes generally perform better in service when the substrate over which they are applied is smooth and free of torn metal,
inclusions, pores, and other defects. It is recommended that the specifications covering the unfinished products provide limits for these defects. A metal
finisher can often remove defects through special treatments such as grinding, polishing, abrasive blasting, chemical etching, and electropolishing.
However, these are not normal in the treatment steps preceding the application of the finish. When they are desired they shall be the subject of agreement
between the buyer and the seller.
9.3 Thickness—The minimum thickness on significant surfaces shall be 6, 12, 25, or 40 μm, as designated by the purchaser (see
8.1).
9.4 Significant Surfaces—Significant surfaces are defined as those normally visible (directly or by reflection) or are essential
to the serviceability or function of the article; or can be the source of corrosion products or tarnish films that interfere with the
function or desirable appearance of the article. When necessary, the significant surfaces shall be indicated on the drawings of the
parts, or by the provision of suitably marked samples.
NOTE 4—When significant surfaces are involved on which the specified thickness of finish cannot be readily controlled, it will be necessary to apply
greater thickness on the more accessible surfaces, to use special racking, or both. The thickness requirements of this specification are minimum, (see Table
2). Variation in the finish thickness from point to point on a coated article is inherent in electroplating. Therefore, the finish thickness will have to exceed
the specified value at some points on the significant surfaces to ensure that it equals or exceeds the specified value at all points. In most cases, the average
finish thickness on an article will be greater than the specified value; how much greater is largely determined by the shape of the article (see Practice
B507) and the characteristics of the plating process. In addition, the average finish thickness on articles will vary from article to article within a production
lot, Therefore, if all of the articles in a production lot are to meet the thickness requirement, the average finish thickness for the production lot as a wh
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.