Standard Test Methods for Physical and Environmental Performance Properties of <brk/>Insulations and Jackets for Telecommunications Wire and Cable

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 Dimensional measurements, properly interpreted, provide information with regard to the conductors, insulation, or jacket. The dimensional measurements provide data for research and development, engineering design, quality control, and acceptance or rejection under specifications.
SCOPE
1.1 These test methods cover procedures for the physical testing of thermoplastic insulations and jackets used on telecommunications wire and cable and the testing of physical characteristics and environmental performance properties of completed products. To determine the procedure to be used on the particular insulation or jacket or on the completed wire or cable, make reference to the specification for that product.  
1.2 These test methods appear in the following sections of this standard:    
Test Method  
Section(s)  
Dimensional Measurements of Insulations, Jackets, Miscellaneous
Cable Components, and of Completed Cable  
4 – 9  
Cross-sectional Areas  
9  
Diameters  
6  
Eccentricity  
8  
Thickness  
7  
Physical and Environmental Tests of Insulation and Jackets  
10 – 25  
Aging Test (Jackets Only)  
24  
Cold Bend (Insulation Only)  
16  
Environmental Stress Crack (Polyolefin Jackets Only)  
21  
Heat Distortion (Jackets Only)  
22  
Heat Shock (Jackets Only)  
23  
Insulation Adhesion  
19  
Insulation and Jacket Shrinkback (Oven Test)  
14  
Insulation Compression  
20  
Insulation Shrinkback (Solder Test)  
15  
Melt Flow Rate Change—Polyolefin Materials  
12  
Oil Immersion Test (Jackets Only)  
25  
Oxygen Induction Time (Polyolefin Insulation Only)  
17  
Oxygen Induction Time (Cable Filling Compound Only)  
18  
Tensile and Elongation Tests  
13  
Physical and Environmental Tests of Insulations and Jackets of
Completed Wire and Cable  
26 – 42  
Cable Torsion Test  
38  
Compound Flow Test (Filled Core Wire and Cable Only)  
42  
Corrugation Extensibility Test  
36  
Cable Impact Test  
33  
Jacket Bonding Tests  
29  
Jacket Notch Test  
32  
Jacket Peel or Pull  
28  
Jacket Slip Strength Test  
30  
Procedure  
Section(s)  
Pressure Test (Air Core Wire and Cable Only)  
40  
Sheath Adherence Test  
31  
Water Penetration Test (Filled Core Wire and Cable Only)  
41  
Wire and Cable Bending Test  
34  
Wire breaking strength  
37  
1.3 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard, except where only SI units are given.  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. For specific warning statement see 19.1.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
30-Sep-2020

Relations

Effective Date
15-Nov-2023
Effective Date
01-May-2020
Effective Date
15-Nov-2016
Effective Date
01-Oct-2015
Effective Date
01-Aug-2013
Effective Date
01-Apr-2013
Effective Date
01-Apr-2012
Effective Date
01-Apr-2012
Effective Date
15-Nov-2011
Effective Date
15-May-2010
Effective Date
01-Mar-2010
Effective Date
01-Oct-2008
Effective Date
01-May-2008
Effective Date
01-May-2008
Effective Date
01-Mar-2008

Overview

ASTM D4565-20 is the internationally recognized standard outlining the test methods for evaluating the physical and environmental performance properties of thermoplastic insulations and jackets used in telecommunications wire and cable. Developed by ASTM Committee D09, this standard serves as a critical reference for manufacturers, quality control labs, and engineers in the telecommunications industry, providing reliable procedures for testing completed wire and cable products, as well as their individual components.

The standard enhances product consistency, performance verification, and regulatory compliance by specifying procedures for dimensional, physical, and environmental testing. Its rigorous methods support applications in research and development, engineering design, and quality assurance, ensuring that telecommunications cables meet industry specifications and regulatory demands.

Key Topics

Dimensional Measurements:

  • Measurement of insulation and jacket thickness, diameter, eccentricity, and cross-sectional area.
  • Evaluation of cable components and completed cables to verify product design and manufacturing quality.

Physical Performance Tests:

  • Tensile and elongation testing of insulation and jacket materials.
  • Measurements of adhesion, compression, and slip strength to assess mechanical durability and performance.

Environmental Performance Tests:

  • Aging resistance (jackets only), cold bend (insulation only), and environmental stress cracking (polyolefin jackets only).
  • Heat distortion and heat shock tests for jackets.
  • Tests for insulation and jacket shrinkback, both oven and solder-based.

Specialized Cable Tests:

  • Impact, torsion, bending, pressure, and water penetration tests for completed wire and cable assemblies.
  • Compound flow, corrugation extensibility, jacket bonding, notch, peel, and slip strength assessments.
  • Oxygen induction time and melt flow rate testing for polyolefin materials to determine stability and processing consistency.

Units and Safety:

  • Standardizes inch-pound units, with SI unit conversions for informational purposes.
  • Emphasizes user responsibility for establishing proper safety, health, and environmental practices.

Applications

ASTM D4565-20 is vital for multiple stakeholders involved in the production, evaluation, and installation of telecommunications wire and cable. Key practical applications include:

  • Quality Control: Manufacturers use these test methods throughout the production process to ensure product batches align with performance standards and customer requirements.
  • Product Development: R&D teams rely on the outlined tests to assess new materials, coatings, or cable designs under simulated operational and environmental conditions.
  • Compliance and Certification: Regulatory bodies and certifying organizations refer to this standard to validate that telecommunications cables adhere to industry mandates and safety standards.
  • Procurement and Acceptance Testing: Product specifications in procurement contracts often reference ASTM D4565-20, providing objective criteria for acceptance or rejection of cable shipments.
  • Engineering Design and Installation: Engineers apply test data from this standard to choose appropriate telecommunications cables for specific operating environments, including subterranean, aerial, or high-stress locations.

Related Standards

To ensure comprehensive cable testing and evaluation, ASTM D4565-20 is frequently used alongside other industry standards and test methods, such as:

  • ASTM D2633: Test Methods for Thermoplastic Insulations and Jackets for Wire and Cable.
  • ASTM D3032: Test Methods for Hookup Wire Insulation.
  • ASTM D471: Test Method for Rubber Property – Effect of Liquids.
  • ASTM D638: Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics.
  • ASTM D1238: Test Method for Melt Flow Rates of Thermoplastics by Extrusion Plastometer.
  • ASTM D1248: Specification for Polyethylene Plastics Extrusion Materials for Wire and Cable.
  • ASTM D1693: Test Method for Environmental Stress-Cracking of Ethylene Plastics.
  • ASTM E29: Practice for Using Significant Digits in Test Data to Determine Conformance with Specifications.

For professionals in telecommunications wiring and cabling, ASTM D4565-20 remains a reliable and authoritative benchmark for ensuring superior insulation and jacket quality, safety, and long-term performance.

Buy Documents

Standard

ASTM D4565-20 - Standard Test Methods for Physical and Environmental Performance Properties of <brk/>Insulations and Jackets for Telecommunications Wire and Cable

English language (19 pages)
sale 15% off
sale 15% off
Standard

REDLINE ASTM D4565-20 - Standard Test Methods for Physical and Environmental Performance Properties of <brk/>Insulations and Jackets for Telecommunications Wire and Cable

English language (19 pages)
sale 15% off
sale 15% off

Get Certified

Connect with accredited certification bodies for this standard

Intertek Testing Services NA Inc.

Intertek certification services in North America.

ANAB United States Verified

UL Solutions

Global safety science company with testing, inspection and certification.

ANAB United States Verified

ANCE

Mexican certification and testing association.

EMA Mexico Verified

Sponsored listings

Frequently Asked Questions

ASTM D4565-20 is a standard published by ASTM International. Its full title is "Standard Test Methods for Physical and Environmental Performance Properties of <brk/>Insulations and Jackets for Telecommunications Wire and Cable". This standard covers: SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 5.1 Dimensional measurements, properly interpreted, provide information with regard to the conductors, insulation, or jacket. The dimensional measurements provide data for research and development, engineering design, quality control, and acceptance or rejection under specifications. SCOPE 1.1 These test methods cover procedures for the physical testing of thermoplastic insulations and jackets used on telecommunications wire and cable and the testing of physical characteristics and environmental performance properties of completed products. To determine the procedure to be used on the particular insulation or jacket or on the completed wire or cable, make reference to the specification for that product. 1.2 These test methods appear in the following sections of this standard: Test Method Section(s) Dimensional Measurements of Insulations, Jackets, Miscellaneous Cable Components, and of Completed Cable 4 – 9 Cross-sectional Areas 9 Diameters 6 Eccentricity 8 Thickness 7 Physical and Environmental Tests of Insulation and Jackets 10 – 25 Aging Test (Jackets Only) 24 Cold Bend (Insulation Only) 16 Environmental Stress Crack (Polyolefin Jackets Only) 21 Heat Distortion (Jackets Only) 22 Heat Shock (Jackets Only) 23 Insulation Adhesion 19 Insulation and Jacket Shrinkback (Oven Test) 14 Insulation Compression 20 Insulation Shrinkback (Solder Test) 15 Melt Flow Rate Change—Polyolefin Materials 12 Oil Immersion Test (Jackets Only) 25 Oxygen Induction Time (Polyolefin Insulation Only) 17 Oxygen Induction Time (Cable Filling Compound Only) 18 Tensile and Elongation Tests 13 Physical and Environmental Tests of Insulations and Jackets of Completed Wire and Cable 26 – 42 Cable Torsion Test 38 Compound Flow Test (Filled Core Wire and Cable Only) 42 Corrugation Extensibility Test 36 Cable Impact Test 33 Jacket Bonding Tests 29 Jacket Notch Test 32 Jacket Peel or Pull 28 Jacket Slip Strength Test 30 Procedure Section(s) Pressure Test (Air Core Wire and Cable Only) 40 Sheath Adherence Test 31 Water Penetration Test (Filled Core Wire and Cable Only) 41 Wire and Cable Bending Test 34 Wire breaking strength 37 1.3 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard, except where only SI units are given. 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. For specific warning statement see 19.1. 1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 5.1 Dimensional measurements, properly interpreted, provide information with regard to the conductors, insulation, or jacket. The dimensional measurements provide data for research and development, engineering design, quality control, and acceptance or rejection under specifications. SCOPE 1.1 These test methods cover procedures for the physical testing of thermoplastic insulations and jackets used on telecommunications wire and cable and the testing of physical characteristics and environmental performance properties of completed products. To determine the procedure to be used on the particular insulation or jacket or on the completed wire or cable, make reference to the specification for that product. 1.2 These test methods appear in the following sections of this standard: Test Method Section(s) Dimensional Measurements of Insulations, Jackets, Miscellaneous Cable Components, and of Completed Cable 4 – 9 Cross-sectional Areas 9 Diameters 6 Eccentricity 8 Thickness 7 Physical and Environmental Tests of Insulation and Jackets 10 – 25 Aging Test (Jackets Only) 24 Cold Bend (Insulation Only) 16 Environmental Stress Crack (Polyolefin Jackets Only) 21 Heat Distortion (Jackets Only) 22 Heat Shock (Jackets Only) 23 Insulation Adhesion 19 Insulation and Jacket Shrinkback (Oven Test) 14 Insulation Compression 20 Insulation Shrinkback (Solder Test) 15 Melt Flow Rate Change—Polyolefin Materials 12 Oil Immersion Test (Jackets Only) 25 Oxygen Induction Time (Polyolefin Insulation Only) 17 Oxygen Induction Time (Cable Filling Compound Only) 18 Tensile and Elongation Tests 13 Physical and Environmental Tests of Insulations and Jackets of Completed Wire and Cable 26 – 42 Cable Torsion Test 38 Compound Flow Test (Filled Core Wire and Cable Only) 42 Corrugation Extensibility Test 36 Cable Impact Test 33 Jacket Bonding Tests 29 Jacket Notch Test 32 Jacket Peel or Pull 28 Jacket Slip Strength Test 30 Procedure Section(s) Pressure Test (Air Core Wire and Cable Only) 40 Sheath Adherence Test 31 Water Penetration Test (Filled Core Wire and Cable Only) 41 Wire and Cable Bending Test 34 Wire breaking strength 37 1.3 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard, except where only SI units are given. 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. For specific warning statement see 19.1. 1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

ASTM D4565-20 is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 29.035.01 - Insulating materials in general. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.

ASTM D4565-20 has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to ASTM D1238-23a, ASTM E171/E171M-11(2020), ASTM D1248-16, ASTM E171/E171M-11(2015), ASTM D1238-13, ASTM D1693-13, ASTM D1693-12, ASTM D1248-12, ASTM E171/E171M-11, ASTM D638-10, ASTM D3032-10, ASTM E29-08, ASTM D4731-02(2008)e1, ASTM D4732-02(2008)e1, ASTM D1693-08. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.

ASTM D4565-20 is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.

Standards Content (Sample)


This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: D4565 − 20
Standard Test Methods for
Physical and Environmental Performance Properties of
Insulations and Jackets for Telecommunications Wire and
Cable
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D4565; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision.Anumber in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope*
Procedure Section(s)
Pressure Test (Air Core Wire and Cable Only) 40
1.1 These test methods cover procedures for the physical
Sheath Adherence Test 31
testing of thermoplastic insulations and jackets used on tele- Water Penetration Test (Filled Core Wire and Cable Only) 41
Wire and Cable Bending Test 34
communications wire and cable and the testing of physical
Wire breaking strength 37
characteristics and environmental performance properties of
1.3 Thevaluesstatedininch-poundunitsaretoberegarded
completed products. To determine the procedure to be used on
as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical
the particular insulation or jacket or on the completed wire or
conversions to SI units that are provided for information only
cable, make reference to the specification for that product.
andarenotconsideredstandard,exceptwhereonlySIunitsare
1.2 These test methods appear in the following sections of
given.
this standard:
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the
Test Method Section(s)
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
Dimensional Measurements of Insulations, Jackets, Miscellaneous 4–9
Cable Components, and of Completed Cable responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
Cross-sectional Areas 9
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
Diameters 6
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
Eccentricity 8
Thickness 7 For specific warning statement see 19.1.
Physical and Environmental Tests of Insulation and Jackets 10–25
1.5 This international standard was developed in accor-
Aging Test (Jackets Only) 24
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
Cold Bend (Insulation Only) 16
Environmental Stress Crack (Polyolefin Jackets Only) 21
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Heat Distortion (Jackets Only) 22
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
Heat Shock (Jackets Only) 23
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
Insulation Adhesion 19
Insulation and Jacket Shrinkback (Oven Test) 14
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Insulation Compression 20
Insulation Shrinkback (Solder Test) 15
2. Referenced Documents
Melt Flow Rate Change—Polyolefin Materials 12
Oil Immersion Test (Jackets Only) 25
2.1 ASTM Standards:
Oxygen Induction Time (Polyolefin Insulation Only) 17
D471Test Method for Rubber Property—Effect of Liquids
Oxygen Induction Time (Cable Filling Compound Only) 18
Tensile and Elongation Tests 13 D638Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics
Physical and Environmental Tests of Insulations and Jackets of 26–42
D1238Test Method for Melt Flow Rates of Thermoplastics
Completed Wire and Cable
by Extrusion Plastometer
Cable Torsion Test 38
Compound Flow Test (Filled Core Wire and Cable Only) 42 D1248Specification for Polyethylene Plastics Extrusion
Corrugation Extensibility Test 36
Materials for Wire and Cable
Cable Impact Test 33
D1693Test Method for Environmental Stress-Cracking of
Jacket Bonding Tests 29
Jacket Notch Test 32 Ethylene Plastics
Jacket Peel or Pull 28
D2633Test Methods for Thermoplastic Insulations and
Jacket Slip Strength Test 30
Jackets for Wire and Cable
D3032Test Methods for Hookup Wire Insulation
These test methods are under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D09 on
Electrical and Electronic Insulating Materials and are the direct responsibility of
Subcommittee D09.07 on Electrical Insulating Materials. For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
Current edition approved Oct. 1, 2020. Published November 2020. Originally contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
approved in 1986. Last previous edition approved in 2015 as D4565–15. DOI: Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
10.1520/D4565-20. the ASTM website.
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
D4565 − 20
D4731 Specification for Hot-Application Filling Com- DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENTS OF INSULATIONS,
pounds for Telecommunications Wire and Cable JACKETS, MISCELLANEOUS CABLE
D4732Specification for Cool-Application Filling Com- COMPONENTS, AND COMPLETED CABLES
pounds for Telecommunications Wire and Cable
4. Scope
E29Practice for Using Significant Digits in Test Data to
Determine Conformance with Specifications
4.1 Dimensional measurements include, but are not limited
E171/E171MPracticeforConditioningandTestingFlexible
to,measurementsofinsulationandjacketthicknesses,tapeand
Barrier Packaging
armor thicknesses, conductor diameters, DODs, core
diameters, overall diameters, and so forth.
3. Terminology
5. Significance and Use
3.1 Abbreviations:
5.1 Dimensional measurements, properly interpreted, pro-
3.1.1 DOD—Diameter Over Dielectric. This is a short term
vide information with regard to the conductors, insulation, or
to refer to the overall diameter over an insulated conductor.
jacket. The dimensional measurements provide data for re-
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
search and development, engineering design, quality control,
3.2.1 air core—products in which the air spaces between
and acceptance or rejection under specifications.
cable core components (pairs, and so forth) remain in their
unfilled or natural state.
6. Diameters
3.2.2 armored wire or cable—a wire or cable in which the
6.1 Measure diameters of essentially round items (such as
shielded or jacketed or shielded and jacketed wire or cable is
insulatedoruninsulatedconductors)usinganytypeofmicrom-
completelyenclosedbyametalliccoveringdesignedtoprotect
eterreadingtoatleast0.001in.(0.025mm)witheachdivision
the underlying telecommunications elements from mechanical
of a width that facilitates estimation of each measurement to
damage.
0.0001 in. (0.0025 mm). Take a minimum of two readings,
3.2.2.1 Discussion—Select shielding or armoring, or both,
essentiallyatrightanglestoeachother,andaveragetheresults.
from a variety of materials (for example, aluminum, copper,
6.2 In case of dispute, optical methods as described in Test
steel). The armoring is applied in a variety of ways (for
Methods D3032 shall be used as the referee method.
example, helically wrapped, longitudinally applied, applied
corrugated or smooth).
NOTE 1—For insulated conductors with dual insulation (for example,
foam-skin),theDODoftheinnerlayermustbemeasuredusingtheoptical
3.2.3 cable, telecommunications—products of six or more
methods of Test Methods D3032.
pair.
6.3 Measure the approximate or effective diameters of
3.2.4 filled core—those products in which air spaces are
non-circular cross sections (such as irregular or oval cables or
filled with some materials intended to exclude air or moisture,
cable cores) by the use of strap gauges.
or both.
6.4 Precision and Bias—The precision and bias of this test
3.2.5 gopher-resistant—awireorcablethatresiststheattack
method for measuring diameters are in accordance with Test
of gophers when installed directly buried.
Methods D2633.
3.2.5.1 Discussion—Telecommunications wire and cable
products intended for direct burial in the earth are normally
7. Thicknesses
rated as either “gopher-resistant” or “non-gopher-resistant.”
7.1 Measureinsulationthicknessusingappropriatemethods
User selection of products for burial will depend upon the
specified in Test Methods D2633, except that the micrometer
anticipated gopher protection needed for the planned installa-
accuracy described in 6.1 is required. A pin gauge having the
tion site. The gopher-resistant rating is assigned based upon
accuracy of the micrometers as specified in 6.1 is acceptable
test evaluations (evaluations are commonly performed by the
for thickness measurements made on tubular sections of
Fish and Wildlife Service, US Department of the Interior,
insulation removed from conductors. Optical methods (as
Denver, CO).
specified in 6.2) are also permitted.
3.2.6 non-gopher-resistant—a wire or cable that is not
7.2 Measure jacket thickness using appropriate methods
designed to resist gopher attack (see 3.2.5).
specified in Test Methods D2633, except that the micrometer
3.2.7 pair—twoinsulatedconductorscombinedwithatwist.
accuracy specified in 6.1 is required. In determining the
3.2.8 sheath—thejacketandanyunderlyinglayersofshield, thickness of jackets applied over corrugated shields or armors,
armor,orotherintermediatematerialdowntobutnotincluding
measurements must be made in the corrugation impressions
the core wrap. (thinnestjacketspots).Opticalmethods(asspecifiedin6.2)are
also permitted.
3.2.9 shielded wire or cable—a wire or cable in which the
core (or inner jacket) is completely enclosed by a metallic 7.3 Precision and Bias—The precision and bias of this test
covering designed to shield the core from electrostatic or
method for measuring thickness are in accordance with Test
electromagnetic interference.
Methods D2633.
3.2.10 wire, telecommunications—products containing less
NOTE 2—For designated purposes (such as process control, and so
than six pair. forth), continuous uniformity thickness gauges or measuring devices are
D4565 − 20
employed during processing to provide running records of jacket thick-
particular reel of finished wire or cable; accordingly, average
nesses. Record charts are normally maintained for a minimum of six
raw materials values shall be established as necessary for an
months.
appropriatemanufacturingtimeframe,unlessotherwiseagreed
upon between the producer and the purchaser.
8. Eccentricity
12.2 Insulation Material—Perform tests on insulation re-
8.1 Calculate eccentricity using measured thickness values
moved from finished conductors. Note that thin wall and fine
for insulation or jacket, or both.
gauge insulations shall be handled carefully because of en-
8.2 Calculate absolute eccentricity, E , of insulation or
ab
trapped air. In the case of insulation in filled cable, the
jacket, or both as follows:
preferred method is to obtain insulating material from conduc-
E 5 ~maximum thickness! 2 ~minimumthickness! (1)
tors before they are exposed to the filling operation. If
ab
necessary, conductors obtained from completed filled cable
8.3 Calculate percent eccentricity, E , of insulation or
%
shall be wiped dry and free of grease or foreign material using
jacket, or both as follows:
a dry cloth (without solvent). Chop the insulation, stripped
~maximumthickness! 2 ~minimumthickness !
fromaconductor,asnecessarytoobtainspecimenssuitablefor
E 5 3100 % (2)
~ !
%
averagethickness
~ !
testing(approximately3gofmaterialisrequiredforeachtest).
8.4 Precision and Bias—The precision and bias of this test
TestthechoppedmaterialasrequiredbyTestMethodD1238to
method of measuring eccentricity are in accordance with Test
determine a melt flow rate. Run three tests and average the
Methods D2633.
results.Standardconditionsoftestshallbeasindicatedin12.1.
12.3 Jacket Material—Jacket material used for this test
9. Cross-Sectional Areas
must be free of filling or flooding compound. Soft filling or
9.1 When needed, determine cross-sectional areas (usually
flooding compounds shall be removed by thoroughly wiping
insulations or jackets only) using the methods outlined in Test
the jacket specimen using a clean dry cloth (without solvent);
Methods D2633, except that the dimensions used in the
harder filling or flooding compounds shall be removed by
calculations must be maintained to the accuracy specified in
cutting.Buffingispermittedtobeusedasafinishingoperation
6.1.
to ensure clean and dry specimens. Use jacketing material
removed from completed cable for performing tests. Chop the
9.2 Precision and Bias—The precision and bias of this test
method for measuring cross-section areas are as specified in jacket material removed from the cable as is necessary to
obtain specimens suitable for testing (approximately3gof
Test Methods D2633.
materialisrequiredforeachtest).Testthechoppedmaterialas
PHYSICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL TESTS OF
required by Test Method D1238 to determine a melt flow rate.
INSULATIONS AND JACKETS
Run three tests and average the results. Standard conditions of
test shall be as indicated in 12.1.
10. Scope
12.4 Calculation—Calculate the percent increase in flow
10.1 Physical and environmental tests for insulations and
rate as follows:
jacketsinclude,butarenotlimitedto,determinationofsomeor
M 2 M
all of the properties covered in Sections12–25. 2 1
I 5 3100 (3)
M
11. Significance and Use
where:
11.1 Physical tests, properly interpreted, provide informa-
I = increase,%,
tion with regard to the physical properties of the insulation or
M = melt index of raw material, and
jacket. The physical test values give an approximation of how
M = melt index of material from the finished cable.
the insulation will physically perform in its service life.
12.5 Precision and Bias—Theprecisionandbiasofthistest
Physical tests provide data for research and development,
method for measuring melt-flow rate changes are basically in
engineeringdesign,qualitycontrol,andacceptanceorrejection
accordance with Test Method D1238.
under specifications.
13. Tensile and Elongation Tests
12. Melt Flow Rate Change—Polyolefin Materials
13.1 Insulation Material—Provide test specimens by re-
12.1 Raw Material Baseline—Melt flow rate for insulation
moving insulation from finished conductors. (See Test Speci-
and jacket materials obtained from finished cable must be
men section of Test Methods D2633 for methods of removing
compared with the flow rates for corresponding raw materials.
the conductor.) Perform tests in accordance with Test Method
Determine the flow rates for the basic insulating and jacketing
D638 to determine such properties as tensile strength
raw materials in accordance with the requirements of Test
(nominal), yield strength, and percentage elongation at break.
Method D1238. Standard conditions of test shall be as pre-
The speed of testing shall be as prescribed by the product
scribedbytheproductspecification.Ifpossible,obtainsamples
specifications.
ofrawmaterialsbeforeorduringtheextrusionprocess(but not
after heating). Since insulating and jacketing raw materials are 13.2 Jacket Material—Providetestspecimensbydiecutting
normally obtained and used in bulk, it is usually difficult if not jacket segments removed (cut) from finished cable. Perform
impossible to relate a particular lot of raw material with a testing in accordance with Test Method D638 to determine
D4565 − 20
suchpropertiesastensilestrength(nominal),yieldstrengthand result of the heat exposure. Shrinkback in inches (or millime-
percentageelongationatbreak.Thespeedoftestingshallbeas tres) is the total measured length of the bared conductor minus
prescribed in the product specifications. the original length of the bared conductor (0.5 in. (13 mm)).
13.3 Precision and Bias—The precision and bias of these 15.2 Precision and Bias—Nostatementismadeabouteither
testmethodsformeasuringtensileandelongationpropertiesof the precision or bias of this test method for measuring
insulations and jackets are in accordance with Test Method shrinkback since the result merely states whether there is
D638. conformance to the criteria for success specified in the product
specification.
14. Insulation and Jacket Shrinkback (Oven Test)
16. Cold Bend (Insulation Only)
14.1 Insulation Material—Perform tests on insulated con-
ductors. Unless otherwise specified, test a minimum of one
16.1 Preferably conduct the test in the cold chamber. Tests
sample of each color of insulation from a cable. Immediately
shall be performed on insulated conductors. The insulation
prior to testing, cut specimens 8 in. (200 mm) long from the
shall not show any cracks visible by normal or corrected-to-
center of a 5-ft (1.5m) length; then reduce them to 6 in.
normal vision, when a specimen of insulated conductor that
(150mm) by trimming each end of the specimen. Place these
was conditioned to the specified temperature for 1 h, and
specimens in a forced air type circulating oven or in a forced
wrappedaroundthemandrelinthecoolingchamberatleastsix
convection type circulating air oven for4hatthe temperature
adjacent turns.Test temperature and mandrel diameter shall be
prescribed. The specimens shall be placed on a layer of
as prescribed by the product specification. Bending shall be at
preheated talc or felt. At the end of the conditioning period,
anapproximatelyuniformratesothatthetimeconsumedisnot
cool the wire to room temperature and measure the shrinkback
more than 1 min.
oftheinsulation.Shrinkbackisdefinedasthetotalshrinkageof
16.2 When the mandrel is too large for the chamber, place
the insulation from both ends of the specimen in inches (or
the sample in the low temperature chamber for the specified
millimetres).
temperature for 1 h, and upon removal from the low tempera-
14.2 Jacket Material—Perform tests on slabs cut from the
ture chamber, immediately wind around the mandrel for the
cablejacket.Unlessotherwisespecified,cutaminimumoffour
specifiednumberofatleastsixadjacentturns.Testtemperature
test specimens, each 2 in. (51 mm) long, 0.25 in. (6.3 mm)
and mandrel diameter shall be as prescribed by the product
wide, and the same thickness as the jacket. Make the length-
specification. Bending shall be at an approximately uniform
wisecutsparalleltothelongitudinalaxisofthecablewitheach
rate so that the time consumed is not more than 1 min.
specimen spaced circumferentially in 90° increments around
16.3 Precision and Bias—The precision of these tests has
the cable periphery. For cables that are longitudinally shielded
not been determined. No statement can be made about the bias
orarmored,oneofthespecimensshallbecutfromaportionof
of this test method for insulation cold bend since a standard
thejacketlyingdirectlyovertheoutershieldorarmoroverlap.
material is not available.
Place these specimens on a layer of preheated talc or felt in a
forced-air type circulating oven or in a forced-convection type
17. Oxidative Induction Time (Polyolefin Insulation
circulatingairovenfor4hatthetemperatureprescribed.Atthe
Only)
end of the conditioning period, cool the specimens to room
17.1 Scope—This test method covers the determination of
temperatureandmeasuretheshrinkbackofthejacketmaterial.
an Oxidative Induction Time (OIT) value for polyolefin insu-
Shrinkback is defined as the total lengthwise shrinkage in
lation materials removed from completed wire or cable prod-
inches (or millimetres).
ucts. This OIT value is determined by a thermoanalytical
14.3 Precision and Bias—Nostatementismadeabouteither
measurement of the onset time for the exothermic oxidation of
the precision or bias of these methods for measuring shrink-
insulation in pure oxygen, at a specified temperature. For
back since the result merely states whether there is confor-
commentary and additional information on the background,
mance to the criteria for success specified in the product
development, and significant details of this test procedure, see
specification.
Appendix X1.
15. Insulation Shrinkback (Solder Test)
17.2 Summary of Test Method—This test method describes
15.1 Test specimens of finished insulated conductor for the instrument calibration procedures, sample preparation,
solder shrinkback. Unless otherwise specified, test a minimum experimentalprocedure,andcalculationmethodsfordetermin-
of one specimen of each insulation color. Immediately prior to ingOITvaluesforpolyolefininsulationmaterials.Aninsulated
testing, cut 8-in. (200mm) specimens from the center of a 5-ft wire sample is removed from a completed cable/wire product
(1.5m) length and then reduce each specimen to 6 in. and wiped to remove filling compounds that are present in the
(150mm) by trimming each end of the specimen. Using any completed cable/wire.Two types of insulation test samples are
convenient method, strip 0.5 in. (13 mm) of insulation from described:
one end of the specimen. Using a solder pot maintained at a 17.2.1 Type I—Insulation stripped from wire (no copper
temperature of approximately 320 °C, immerse the bared present), or
conductor to a depth of 0.25 in. (6 mm) into the molten solder 17.2.1.1 Use Type I samples to measure the intrinsic stabil-
and hold for a period of 20 s. Remove the specimen and ity of the material and the efficacy of thermal stabilizers such
measure the amount of insulation shrinkback occurring as a as antioxidants.
D4565 − 20
17.2.2 Type II—Insulation on the wire (insulation and cop- 17.4.4 Pans—Standard aluminum DSC pans (6 mm in
per conductor). diameter) are required to hold specimens during testing.
17.2.2.1 Use Type II samples to evaluate not only the
NOTE6—Donotusecopperpansbecausethevariableoxidationstateof
thermal stability, but alsothemetal deactivationefficacyof the
the copper leads to imprecision in determination of the OITvalue. Do not
additives.
use metal screens (for example stainless steel mesh) sincethey actaspro-
oranti-oxidantsandhavethepotentialtoreduceprecisionandaccuracyof
17.3 Significance and Use:
the OIT measurement.
17.3.1 The OIT value measures the oxidative thermal sta-
17.4.4.1 Degreasing—To degrease pans, wash in Reagent
bility of a material and is primarily dependent on:
Grade acetone for 1 min and dry in a stream of dry nitrogen.
17.3.1.1 The intrinsic thermal stability of the material,
Use sufficient acetone to thoroughly wash the pans, that is,
17.3.1.2 The type and concentration of antioxidants and
;200mL/100pans.Ultrasoniccleaningofthepansinacetone
other thermal stabilizers present,
is acceptable.
17.3.1.3 The type and concentration of metal deactivators
17.4.5 Temperature Standards—Use pure (>99.9%) indium
present, and
and tin as temperature calibration standards. See Table 1.
17.3.1.4 The test temperature.
17.4.6 Balance—An analytical balance to weigh specimens
17.3.1.5 Discussion—Potentially, other components in the
with a sensitivity of 60.1 mg or better.
insulation material cause secondary effects. The OIT value for
an insulation has the potential to be significantly altered by 17.5 Instrument Calibration:
17.5.1 Instrument Preparation—Clean instrument cells be-
additives such as pigments, fillers, and processing aids as well
as catalyst residues from the cable, wire, insulation, or resin tween testing of different material formulations. Follow the
instrument manual procedure for cleaning cells or hold the
manufacture. The OIT value increases or decreases depending
on whether these additives and residues act as oxidation cells at 530 °C for 10 min in oxygen.
17.5.2 Temperature Calibration—Follow the instrument
inhibitors or promoters at the test temperature. At typical test
temperatures(forexample,170to220°C),compoundspresent manual procedures for temperature calibration of the instru-
ment using the following heating programs and calibration
in the polyolefin material have the potential to decompose and
change the polyolefin oxidation mechanism and thereby the criteria.
17.5.2.1 Indium—Theexperimentalsequencefortheindium
OIT value. If the oxidation mechanism is so altered, then the
OITvalue will not necessarily correlate to aging at normal use calibration is:
(1)Equilibrate at 50 °C (in nitrogen).
temperatures. Before using the OIT value to predict field
performance and lifetimes, it is suggested that additional (2)Heat at 10 °C/min from 50 to 145 °C.
studies be undertaken to establish a correlation between the (3)Heat at 1 °C/min from 145 to 165 °C.
OIT value measured at high temperature and the performance (4)Cool specimen to below 50 °C.
of the polyolefin under typical field conditions. (5)Repeat steps (1) through (4).
17.3.2 The OIT value is useful as a product performance (6)Use melting temperatures and heat of fusion from
test, quality control parameter, or a research and development second scan for calibration purposes.
17.5.2.2 Tin—Theexperimentalsequenceforthetincalibra-
tool for polyolefin materials.
tion is:
17.4 Apparatus, Reagents and Materials:
(1)Equilibrate at 50 °C (in nitrogen).
17.4.1 Calorimeter—ThisOITTestisperformedusingcom-
(2)Heat at 10 °C/min from 50 to 220 °C.
mercialanalyzersknownasDifferentialScanningCalorimeters
(3)Heat at 1 °C/min from 220 to 240 °C.
(DSCs)(Note3)whichmeasureheatflowasafunctionoftime
(4)Cool specimen to below 50 °C.
and temperature.ADSC with isothermal control and specimen
(5)Repeat steps (1) through (4).
temperature precision of at least 60.1 °C is required.
(6)Use melting temperatures and heat of fusion from
NOTE 3—Perkin Elmer’s Differential Scanning Calorimeters and TA
second scan for calibration purposes.
Instruments Differential Thermal Analyzer with a DSC cell have been
17.5.2.3 Melting Temperature—For calibration purposes,
found to produce acceptable results. Equivalent equipment producing
define the melting temperature as the extrapolated onset of the
comparable results may be used.
melting peak, not the peak maximum (see Fig. 1).
NOTE 4—This test requires accurate temperature and atmosphere
control in the DSC specimen compartment. DSC manufacturers offer 17.5.3 Calibration Criteria—An instrument in calibration
choices in cell configuration and temperature control parameters that
will validate the melting temperatures of pure indium and pure
affect this required control. For example, in some power compensation
tin at 156.6 6 0.2 °C and 232.0 6 0.5 °C, respectively. In
DSCs, use of the two-hole platinum specimen holder lids with a special
“flow-through” swing-away block cover is required. Consult equipment-
specific literature and with the equipment manufacturer to optimize the
A
operation of individual DSCs for this test. TABLE 1 Literature Values for Calibration Standards
Melting Temperature, °C Heat of Fusion (J/g)
17.4.2 Nitrogen—Use cylinder nitrogen (99.9% purity or
Calibration Standard
T ∆H
m m
better) for purging of cells.
Indium (In) 156.61 28.7
Tin (Sn) 232.0 60.7
17.4.3 Oxygen—Use cylinder oxygen (99.9% purity or
A
better) during the oxidation stage.
Rossini, F. D., Applied Chemistry, Vol 22, 1970, p. 557; Gronwold, F., Acta
Chemica Scandinavica, Vol 21, 1967, p. 1695; Gronwold, F, Journal of Thermal
NOTE 5—Do not use house gases that are piped throughout buildings
Analysis, Vol 13, 1978, p. 419; Gronwold, F., Pure and Applied Chemistry, 1992.
since their purity varies significantly.
D4565 − 20
FIG. 2 Specimen/Pan Arrangement
17.6.5 Specimen Weight—Record the specimen weight to
FIG. 1 Indium Calibration
60.1 mg.
NOTE 9—To determine the insulation sample weight, strip a 100mm
section of the insulated wire and weigh the stripped insulation. Divide the
addition, the heat of fusion for indium and tin will be 28.7 6
insulation weight by the sample length to determine the insulation weight
0.8 J/g and 60.7 6 2.0 J/g, respectively. Check the instrument
per mm (W). Multiplying the specimen length (5 to 6 mm) by this factor
i
calibration every one to two months or more frequently since (W) will give the weight for the insulation specimen.
i
this test requires accurate temperature control. (See Note 4.)
17.7 Procedure:
17.5.4 Gas Flow Rate—Use an oxygen flow rate of 50 6
17.7.1 Load Specimens—Place the specimen (specimen and
5mL⁄min as measured with a bubble meter or calibrated
pan) in the specimen position and an empty aluminum pan in
rotameter. Other flow rates between 50 and 200 mL/min are
the reference position of the instrument.
permitted, but must be reported.
17.7.2 Initial Temperature—Equilibrate the specimen at or
below 60 °C.
NOTE 7—It is desirable that the tubing connecting the gas switching
point and the calorimeter cell have an inside volume less than 20 mL.
17.7.3 Flush Cell—Holdatthisinitialtemperaturefor5min
NOTE 8—The average OIT value at 100 mL/min was ;3% lower than
while the nitrogen purge flushes the cell at a flow rate of ;50
the OIT measured at 50 mL/min. OIT values determined at 100 mL/min
to 60 mL/min.
had ;5% improved precision over OIT values obtained at 50 mL/min.
17.7.4 Heat to Test Temperature—Heat at 20 °C/min to the
17.5.5 Test Temperature—If possible, run a blank specimen
test temperature (typically 200 °C) with nitrogen gas purging
to ensure that the instrument can maintain the test temperature
the DSC cell.
within 60.3 °C. Heat the cell to the desired test temperature
NOTE 10—The endothermic peak observed during this heating stage is
(typically 200 °C) and monitor the specimen temperature for
the melting transition of the polyolefin and can be used for identification
10min.Ifnecessary,referto17.7.6forproceduralstrategiesto
(for example, to distinguish between high-density polyethylene, low-
make the measured specimen temperature equal to the desired
density polyethylene, and polypropylenes).
test temperature.
17.7.5 Gas Switch—Hold at test temperature for 5 min to
17.6 Sample Preparation:
establish thermal equilibrium after which switch from the
17.6.1 Insulated Wire Sample—Remove the insulated wires
nitrogenpurgetopureoxygenataflowrateof50 65mL/min.
from completed wire or cable products by removing the outer
Definethisswitchtimeas T .MeasuretheOxidativeInduction
cable sheath, inner metallic shields, and any core wraps. Split
Time (OIT) from this time (T ).
theoutercablesheathlengthwise,andpeelopenthesheathand
17.7.6 Specimen Test Temperature—If possible, record the
any metallic shields to reveal the inner core with the insulated
specimen temperature 5 min after T with a precision of
wire pairs.
60.1 °C or better. The specimen temperature must be within
17.6.2 Sample Cleaning—Wipe the insulated wire sample
60.3 °C of the desired test temperature. If this temperature is
with a clean cotton cloth or paper towel to remove any filling
morethan 60.3°Cfromtherequiredtesttemperature,prepare
compound. Do not use solvents to clean the insulated wire.
anewspecimenandmodifythetemperatureprogramtoensure
17.6.3 Sample Type—Determine the OIT value for an insu-
OIT measurement is made at the required temperature.
lation using either:
NOTE 11—If 200.0 °C was the desired test temperature and the
17.6.3.1 Type I Sample—Insulationstrippedfromthecopper
temperature at T +5 min was 200.7 °C, then set the upper limit of the
wire (see 13.1), or
temperature program to 199.3 °C to correct for the overshoot of the
17.6.3.2 Type II Sample—Insulated wire (insulation and
instrument. Alternatively, monitor and adjust the specimen temperature
continuously during the experiment to maintain the desired temperature
copper wire).
within 60.3 °C.
17.6.4 Specimen/Pan Arrangements—Use a single 5 to
6mm long specimen of insulation (or insulated wire). The 17.7.7 Specimen Scan—Continue the test in pure oxygen
length is such that the specimen fits neatly into the pan. (See until the exothermic peak is observed (on the chart recorder or
Fig. 2). computer screen).
D4565 − 20
17.7.8 Data Collection—Plot the data normalized as heat
flow(W/g)versustime.Expandthe x-axisasmuchaspossible
to facilitate analysis. Vary the y-axis depending on the proce-
dure used to determine the OIT (see 17.8).
17.8 OIT Calculation—Use either of the following two
procedures to determine the Oxidative Induction Time (OIT)
values for the specimens.
NOTE 12—The OIT calculation uses a threshold measure to define the
incipient point for the polyolefin oxidation. The OIT calculation defines
the onset of the major exothermic reaction (that is, the autocatalytic
oxidation reaction).
17.8.1 Procedure 1—OIT (Offset Method):
17.8.1.1 Plot data with a full scale y-axis of 1.0 W/g (or
smaller). (See Fig. 3.)
FIG. 4 OIT Tangent Method
17.8.1.2 Expand the x-axis so that full scale on the x-axis
ranges from T −2 min to 5 to 10 min past the onset of the
oxidation exotherm. This expansion helps to assist in analysis
17.8.2.3 Draw a tangent (dashed line (d) in Fig. 4)atthe
by the offset procedure.
inflection point of the exothermic peak and extend this tangent
17.8.1.3 Draw an extension to the baseline extrapolating
to intersect the baseline (c).
anyinstrumentdrift.Foranexampleseedashedline(a)inFig.
3.
TABLE 2 Summary of Precision Data
17.8.1.4 Draw a second line parallel to baseline (a) at a
Reproducibility
distanceof0.05W/gabovethebaseline.Seedashedline(b)in Repeatability Within
Mean OIT
Laboratory-to-
A
Laboratory (σ )
Sample Value l
Fig. 3.
Laboratory (σ )
R
(min)
17.8.1.5 The intersection of the dashed line (b) with the
(min) (%) (min) (%)
signaltraceisdefinedastheonsetofoxidativedegradationand
HDPE Insulation
(stripped from wire)
is denoted as T .
OIT 121.6 4.5 3.7 7.3 6.0
17.8.1.6 The Oxidative Induction Time by the offset proce-
OIT 126.4 2.8 2.2 7.2 5.7
dure is defined as the time from oxygen introduction (T)to
HDPE Insulation
(with copper wire)
this onset:
OIT 62.6 6.2 10.0 10.0 16.0
OIT offset 5 T 2 T (4) OIT 69.5 3.6 5.2 8.6 12.3
~ !
1 1 0 2
A
Five specimens were run for each sample
17.8.2 Procedure 2—OIT (Tangent Method):
17.8.2.1 Plot data with a y-axis sufficient to show full
melting endotherm of the polyolefin and the oxidation endo-
17.8.2.4 The point of intersection is the onset of oxidative
therm. Fora5mg polyolefin specimen, a y-axis of 4 to 5 W/g
degradation by the tangent method. This onset time is denoted
is adequate.
as T .
17.8.2.2 Draw an extension to the baseline extrapolating
17.8.2.5 The Oxidative Induction Time by the tangent
any signal drift. For an example see dashed line (c) in Fig. 4.
procedure is defined as the time from oxygen introduction (T )
to this onset time.
OIT ~tangent! 5 T 2 T (5)
2 2 0
17.9 Report:
17.9.1 Report the following information:
17.9.1.1 Melting temperatures (°C) for indium and tin
together with the date of the last determination,
17.9.1.2 Heats of fusion (J/g) for indium and tin together
with the date of the last determination,
17.9.1.3 Gas flow rate (mL/min),
17.9.1.4 Parameters for each specimen (stripped insulation,
insulated wire, specimen mass, and so forth),
17.9.1.5 Specimen temperature 5 min after gas switch to
oxygen (T +5 min), and
17.9.1.6 OIT (offset) or OIT (tangent). (Unless otherwise
1 2
specified by the user, the reported OIT shall be OIT , tangent
method.)
17.9.1.7 If multiple specimens are tested, report average
FIG. 3 OIT Offset Method OIT values and standard deviations.
D4565 − 20
17.10 Precision and Bias: and isolate it from the cable or wires so as not to contaminate
17.10.1 Precision—The precision of this test method for the compound. Obtain all samples of filling compound by
measuring Oxidative InductionTime, usingType I andType II taking them from manufactured cable or wire rather than by
samples, is illustrated in Table 2. These statistics were deter- obtaining them in an unprocessed condition.
mined from round robin studies between thirteen laboratories
18.4 Instrument Preparation—Clean the instrument cells
using both heat-flux and power-compensated thermal analyz-
aftertheyhavebeenstandingovernightandbetweenthetesting
ers. All data and reports of the task force that developed this
of different material formulations. To clean the cells, bring
3,4
test method are on file at ASTM.
themuptotemperatureandholdthematapproximately400°C
17.10.2 Bias—The test for oxidative induction time has no
for a period of 10 min in nitrogen.
bias since it is defined in terms of this test method.
18.5 Instrument Calibration—Adjust temperature scales ac-
NOTE 13—This test method employs indium and tin as internal
cording to instrument manual instructions until the determined
standards for calibration of temperature and caloric sensing, and requires
melting point of pure indium metal is indicated as 156.6 °C at
strict control of the test conditions to increase precision and hopefully to
a heating rate of 5 °C/min.
reducethebiasintheOITmeasurement.However,asismentionedin17.3
and in Appendix X1, materials which are in the polyolefin have the
NOTE 15—This note on calibration is written specifically for the
potential to decompose at the high temperatures used, causing a shift of
instruments described in footnote 3. It is possible that other equipment is
the OIT from the value for the polyolefin. Such a shift is important in the
equally suitable but yields somewhat different results when testing
use of this test method for quality control of the polyolefin compound. It
identical specimens. For the Perkin-Elmer DSC, run several pure metal
isimportanttorecognizethatthesameshiftisabiaswhenthetestisused
standards (such as, indium, tin, lead, zinc) through their melting point at
to measure the OIT of the polyolefin.
a heating rate of 5 °C/min. Plot melting temperatures and interpolate to
find the required set point. Repeat calibrations require only adjustments
18. Oxygen Induction Time (Cable Filling Compound
for the indium melt temperature.
Only) FortheTAInstrumentsDTAwithaDSCCell,settheinstrumentinthe
isothermal mode and calibrate the starting-temperature dial according to
18.1 Scope—This test method covers a procedure for
the instrument manual.Alternately, set the dial to a reading that results in
determining, by thermal analysis, the oxidative induction time
a corrected thermocouple read-out of the required temperature.
of filling compound removed from completed wire or cable.
18.6 Preparation—Place 3 to 5 mg of the filling material to
NOTE 14—For additional information on wire and cable filling be tested into an aluminum pan and cover this with a clean
compounds, refer to Specifications D4731 and D4732.
stainlesssteelscreen.Crimpthepantoholdthescreeninplace.
18.2 Apparatus, Reagents, and Materials:
18.7 Placethepreparedspecimenpanintheinstrumentcell.
18.2.1 This test is normally performed using commercial
Flush the cell for 5 min using cylinder nitrogen at a flow rate
devices commonly referred to as Differential Scanning Calo-
of 200 6 25 cm /min. Following the nitrogen purge, increase
rimeters (DSC) or as Differential Thermal Analyzers (DTA).
the cell-specimen temperature (at a heating rate of 10 °C/min)
Use of another apparatus is permitted if it is demonstrated to
from the initial temperature to 190 6 2 °C. Once temperature
yieldcomparableresults.Thefollowingreagentsandmaterials
equilibrium of 190 °C has been reached (steady recorder
are also required to perform this test:
signal), switch to oxygen flow at the same flow rate and
18.2.1.1 Use commercial cylinder nitrogen for purging in-
simultaneously start the time base recording.
strument cells.
18.8 Recordthestartoftheoxygeninjectionastime“zero.”
18.2.1.2 Use oxygen in this test method equal to or better
Maintain the isothermal temperature of 190 °C in the pure dry
than 99.6% extra dry grade.
oxygen atmosphere until the oxidative reaction exotherm
18.2.1.3 Small specimen pans are required to hold the
appears on the thermogram (see Fig. 5). When the test is
specimens while in the instrument cells. Pans shall be alumi-
completed, turn off the recorder, switch the gas back to
num.
18.2.1.4 Use No. 316 stainless steel screen (40 mesh) to
cover specimens in the pans.
18.2.1.5 Use pure metal standards such as indium, tin, lead,
or zinc for instrument calibrations as recommended by the
instrument manufacturer.
18.3 Sample Preparation—Select at random a short-length
section, approximately 1 ft (300 mm) long, of completed wire
or cable. Remove the core from the wire or cable section;
accomplish this by pulling or pushing the core out without
cutting the jacket. Remove the filling compound from the core
Supporting data have been filed atASTM International Headquarters and may
beobtainedbyrequestingResearchReportRR:D09-1034.ContactASTMCustomer
Service at service@astm.org.
ThetaskforcesummarizeditsfindinginapaperbyV.J.Kuckpublishedinthe
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Plastics in Telecommunications FIG. 5 Evaluation of Oxidative Induction Time (OIT) From
(Pub. Plastics & Rubber Institute, London, England), September, 1992. Recorded-time-base Thermogram
D4565 − 20
nitrogen, and allow the cell temperature of the instrument to merely states whether there is conformance to the criteria for
cool to ambient temperature. Remove and discard the pan and success specified in the product specification.
specimen.
21. Environmental Stress Crack (Polyolefin Jackets
18.9 On the recorder chart, draw an extension to the
Only)
recorded base line beyond the oxidative reactive exotherm.
21.1 Perform tests on specimens die cut in the transverse
Extrapolate the slope of the oxidative reactive exotherm to
direction from cable jackets having an outside diameter of
intercept the extended base line. The oxidative induction time
1.125 in. (30 mm) and larger. Prepare these specimens and
(OIT) is measured to within 61 min from zero time to the
subject them to an environmental stress cracking test as
intercept point.
specified in Test Method D1693 except that the conditioning
18.10 Precision and Bias—This test method is based on the
requirementiswaived,thedepthofthecontrolledimperfection
exotherm obtained when the filling compound degrades. As
shall be proportional to the jacket thickness, and the stress
such, precision of the test method is strongly dependent on the
crackingreagentshallbea10%solution(byvolume)ofIgepal
extent to which the filling compound under test is degraded.
CO-630 (Antarox CO-630) surfactant.
Since no calculation of OITis possible, a comparison between
21.2 Precision and Bias—The precision of this test method
the measured and the true values cannot be achieved.
has not been determined. No statement can be made about the
bias of this test for environmental stress crack (jacket only)
19. Insulation Adhesion
since the result merely states whether there is conformance to
19.1 Test specimens of finished insulated conductor for
the criteria for success specified in the product specification.
insulation adhesion. Prepare specimens by first trimming
insulated wire specimens to 5 in. (130 mm) in length. Remove
22. Heat Distortion (Jackets Only)
the insulation (by progressively removing short sections) from
22.1 This test is for polyvinyl chloride (PVC) jacket mate-
one end of the wire until only a 1-in. (25mm) length of
rial only.
undisturbed insulation remains at the other end of the speci-
22.2 Prepareasampleapproximately8in.(200mm)longto
men. (Warning—Exercise great care in this step to avoid
have a thickness of 0.050 6 0.010 in. (1.27 6 0.25 mm) and
nicking the conductor while removing the insulation.) Pass the
smooth surfaces. From this sample, prepare test specimens
bared conductor through a die plate or orifice having an
1in. (25.4 mm) long and 0.56 6 0.063 in. (14.3 6 1.6 mm)
aperture measuring 0.003 to 0.005 in. (0.07 to 0.13 mm) larger
wide. Where the diameter of the cable does not permit the
than the conductor until the shoulder of insulation rests on the
preparation of a specimen 0.56 in. (14.3 mm) wide, use a
die plate. Apply tension between the conductor and the die
molded sheet of the same compound.
plate and measure the force required to strip the remaining
insulation from the wire. Compare results with the require-
22.3 Measure the thickness of the specimen, T , using a
ments specified in the product specification. The speed of the
Randall and Stickney gauge, or the equivalent, having a
moving head of the tensile testing machine shall be as
0.375-in. (9.5 mm) foot with no loading other than the
prescribed by the product specification.
85grams-force of the gauge.
19.2 Precision and Bias—The precision of this test has not 22.4 In 3 h, complete the following procedure: Place a
been determined. No statement can be made about the bias of Randall and Stickney gauge, or the equivalent, with a load of
this test for insulation adhesion since the result merely states 2000 g on the foot in an oven that is preheated to a specified
whether there is conformance to the criteria for succe
...


This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: D4565 − 15 D4565 − 20
Standard Test Methods for
Physical and Environmental Performance Properties of
Insulations and Jackets for Telecommunications Wire and
Cable
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D4565; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope*
1.1 These test methods cover procedures for the physical testing of thermoplastic insulations and jackets used on telecommuni-
cations wire and cable and the testing of physical characteristics and environmental performance properties of completed products.
To determine the procedure to be used on the particular insulation or jacket or on the completed wire or cable, make reference to
the specification for that product.
1.2 TheThese test methods appear in the following sections of this standard:
Procedure Sections
Dimensional measurements of insulations, jackets,
miscellaneous cable components, and of completed cable 4 – 9
Cross-sectional areas 9
Diameters 6
Eccentricity 8
Thickness 7
Physical and environmental tests of insulation and jackets 10 – 25
Aging test (jackets only) 24
Cold bend (insulation only) 16
Environmental stress crack (polyolefin jackets only) 21
Heat distortion (jackets only) 22
Heat shock (jackets only) 23
Insulation adhesion 19
Insulation and jacket shrinkback (oven test) 14
Insulation compression 20
Insulation shrinkback (solder test) 15
Melt flow rate change—polyolefin materials 12
Oil immersion test (jackets only) 25
Oxygen induction time (polyolefin insulation only) 17
Oxygen induction time (cable filling compound only) 18
Tensile and elongation tests 13
Physical and environmental tests of insulations and jackets of
completed wire and cable 26 – 42
Cable Torsion Test 38
Compound flow test (filled core wire and cable only) 42
Corrugation extensibility test 36
Cable impact test 33
Jacket bonding tests 29
Procedure Sections
These test methods are under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D09 on Electrical and Electronic Insulating Materials and are the direct responsibility of Subcommittee
D09.07 on Electrical Insulating Materials.
Current edition approved April 1, 2015Oct. 1, 2020. Published April 2015November 2020. Originally approved in 1986. Last previous edition approved in 20102015 as
D4565 – 10.D4565 – 15. DOI: 10.1520/D4565-15.10.1520/D4565-20.
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
D4565 − 20
Jacket notch test 32
Jacket peel or pull 28
Jacket slip strength test 30
Pressure test (air core wire and cable only) 40
Sheath adherance test 31
Water penetration test (filled core wire and cable only) 41
Wire and cable bending test 34
Wire breaking strength 37
Test Method Section(s)
Dimensional Measurements of Insulations, Jackets, Miscellaneous 4 – 9
Cable Components, and of Completed Cable
Cross-sectional Areas 9
Diameters 6
Eccentricity 8
Thickness 7
Physical and Environmental Tests of Insulation and Jackets 10 – 25
Aging Test (Jackets Only) 24
Cold Bend (Insulation Only) 16
Environmental Stress Crack (Polyolefin Jackets Only) 21
Heat Distortion (Jackets Only) 22
Heat Shock (Jackets Only) 23
Insulation Adhesion 19
Insulation and Jacket Shrinkback (Oven Test) 14
Insulation Compression 20
Insulation Shrinkback (Solder Test) 15
Melt Flow Rate Change—Polyolefin Materials 12
Oil Immersion Test (Jackets Only) 25
Oxygen Induction Time (Polyolefin Insulation Only) 17
Oxygen Induction Time (Cable Filling Compound Only) 18
Tensile and Elongation Tests 13
Physical and Environmental Tests of Insulations and Jackets of 26 – 42
Completed Wire and Cable
Cable Torsion Test 38
Compound Flow Test (Filled Core Wire and Cable Only) 42
Corrugation Extensibility Test 36
Cable Impact Test 33
Jacket Bonding Tests 29
Jacket Notch Test 32
Jacket Peel or Pull 28
Jacket Slip Strength Test 30
Procedure Section(s)
Pressure Test (Air Core Wire and Cable Only) 40
Sheath Adherence Test 31
Water Penetration Test (Filled Core Wire and Cable Only) 41
Wire and Cable Bending Test 34
Wire breaking strength 37
1.3 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical
conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard, except where only SI units are
given.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety safety, health, and healthenvironmental practices and determine the
applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. For specific cautionwarning statement see 19.1.
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization
established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued
by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
D471 Test Method for Rubber Property—Effect of Liquids
D638 Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics
D1238 Test Method for Melt Flow Rates of Thermoplastics by Extrusion Plastometer
D1248 Specification for Polyethylene Plastics Extrusion Materials for Wire and Cable
D1693 Test Method for Environmental Stress-Cracking of Ethylene Plastics
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
D4565 − 20
D2633 Test Methods for Thermoplastic Insulations and Jackets for Wire and Cable
D3032 Test Methods for Hookup Wire Insulation
D4731 Specification for Hot-Application Filling Compounds for Telecommunications Wire and Cable
D4732 Specification for Cool-Application Filling Compounds for Telecommunications Wire and Cable
E29 Practice for Using Significant Digits in Test Data to Determine Conformance with Specifications
E171E171/E171M Practice for Conditioning and Testing Flexible Barrier Packaging
3. Terminology
3.1 Abbreviations:
3.1.1 DOD—Diameter Over Dielectric. This is a short term to refer to the overall diameter over an insulated conductor.
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
3.2.1 air core—products in which the air spaces between cable core components (pairs, and so forth) remain in their unfilled or
natural state.
3.2.2 armored wire or cable—a wire or cable in which the shielded or jacketed or shielded and jacketed wire or cable is completely
enclosed by a metallic covering designed to protect the underlying telecommunications elements from mechanical damage.
3.2.2.1 Discussion—
Select shielding or armoring, or both, from a variety of materials (for example:example, aluminum, copper, steel). The armoring
is applied in a variety of ways (for example, helically wrapped, longitudinally applied, applied corrugated or smooth).
3.2.3 cable, telecommunications—products of six or more pair.
3.1.4 DOD—an abbreviation for “Diameter over Dielectric.” This is a short term to refer to the overall diameter over an insulated
conductor.
3.2.4 filled core—those products in which air spaces are filled with some materials intended to exclude air or moisture, or both.
3.2.5 gopher-resistant—a wire or cable that resists the attack of gophers when installed directly buried.
3.2.5.1 Discussion—
Telecommunications wire and cable products intended for direct burial in the earth are normally rated as either “gopher-resistant”
or “non-gopher-resistant.” User selection of products for burial will depend upon the anticipated gopher protection needed for the
planned installation site. The gopher-resistant rating is assigned based upon test evaluations (evaluations are commonly performed
by the Fish and Wildlife Service, US Department of the Interior, Denver, CO).
3.2.6 non-gopher-resistant—a wire or cable that is not designed to resist gopher attack (see 3.1.63.2.5).
3.2.7 pair—two insulated conductors combined with a twist.
3.2.8 sheath—the jacket and any underlying layers of shield, armor, or other intermediate material down to but not including the
core wrap.
3.2.9 shielded wire or cable—a wire or cable in which the core (or inner jacket) is completely enclosed by a metallic covering
designed to shield the core from electrostatic or electromagnetic interference.
3.2.10 wire, telecommunications—products containing less than six pair.
DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENTS OF INSULATIONS, JACKETS, MISCELLANEOUS CABLE
COMPONENTS, AND COMPLETED DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENTS OF INSULATIONS, JACKETS,
MISCELLANEOUS CABLE COMPONENTS, AND COMPLETED CABLES
D4565 − 20
4. Scope
4.1 Dimensional measurements include, but are not limited to, measurements of insulation and jacket thicknesses, tape and armor
thicknesses, conductor diameters, DODs, core diameters, overall diameters, and so forth.
5. Significance and Use
5.1 Dimensional measurements, properly interpreted, provide information with regard to the conductors, insulation, or jacket. The
dimensional measurements provide data for research and development, engineering design, quality control, and acceptance or
rejection under specifications.
6. Diameters
6.1 Measure diameters of essentially round items (such as insulated or uninsulated conductors) using any type of micrometer
reading to at least 0.001 in. (0.025 mm) with each division of a width that facilitates estimation of each measurement to 0.0001
in. (0.0025 mm). Take a minimum of two readings, essentially at right angles to each other, and average the results.
6.2 In case of dispute, optical methods as described in Test Methods D3032 shall be used as the referee method.
NOTE 1—For insulated conductors with dual insulation (for example, foam-skin), the DOD of the inner layer must be measured using the optical methods
of Test Methods D3032.
6.3 Measure the approximate or effective diameters of non-circular cross sections (such as irregular or oval cables or cable cores)
by the use of strap gauges.
6.4 Precision and Bias—The precision and bias of this test method for measuring diameters are in accordance with Test Methods
D2633.
7. Thicknesses
7.1 Measure insulation thickness using appropriate methods specified in Test Methods D2633, except that the micrometer accuracy
described in 6.1 is required. A pin gauge having the accuracy of the micrometers as specified in 6.1 is acceptable for thickness
measurements made on tubular sections of insulation removed from conductors. Optical methods (as specified in 6.2) are also
permitted.
7.2 Measure jacket thickness using appropriate methods specified in Test Methods D2633, except that the micrometer accuracy
specified in 6.1 is required. In determining the thickness of jackets applied over corrugated shields or armors, measurements must
be made in the corrugation impressions (thinnest jacket spots). Optical methods (as specified in 6.2) are also permitted.
7.3 Precision and Bias—The precision and bias of this test method for measuring thickness are in accordance with Test Methods
D2633.
NOTE 2—For designated purposes (such as process control, and so forth), continuous uniformity thickness gauges or measuring devices are employed
during processing to provide running records of jacket thicknesses. Record charts are normally maintained for a minimum of six months.
8. Eccentricity
8.1 Calculate eccentricity using measured thickness values for insulation or jacket, or both.
8.2 Calculate absolute eccentricity, E , of insulation or jacket, or both as follows:
ab
E 5 ~Maximum Thickness!2 ~Minimum Thickness! (1)
ab
E 5 ~maximum thickness!2 ~minimum thickness! (1)
ab
8.3 Calculate percent eccentricity, E , of insulation or jacket, or both as follows:
%
D4565 − 20
Max Thickness 2 Min Thickness
~ ! ~ !
E 5 3100 ~%! (2)
%
~Average Thickness!
~maximum thickness!2 ~minimum thickness !
E 5 3100 % (2)
~ !
%
average thickness
~ !
8.4 Precision and Bias—The precision and bias of this test method of measuring eccentricity are in accordance with Test Methods
D2633.
9. Cross-Sectional Areas
9.1 When needed, determine cross-sectional areas (usually insulations or jackets only) using the methods outlined in Test Methods
D2633, except that the dimensions used in the calculations must be maintained to the accuracy specified in 6.1.
9.2 Precision and Bias—The precision and bias of this test method for measuring cross-section areas are as specified in Test
Methods D2633.
PHYSICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL TESTS OF INSULATIONS AND JACKETS
10. Scope
10.1 Physical and environmental tests for insulations and jackets include, but are not limited to, determination of some or all of
the properties covered in Sections 12 – 25.
11. Significance and Use
11.1 Physical tests, properly interpreted, provide information with regard to the physical properties of the insulation or jacket. The
physical test values give an approximation of how the insulation will physically perform in its service life. Physical tests provide
data for research and development, engineering design, quality control, and acceptance or rejection under specifications.
12. Melt Flow Rate Change—Polyolefin Materials
12.1 Raw Material Baseline—Melt flow rate for insulation and jacket materials obtained from finished cable must be compared
with the flow rates for corresponding raw materials. Determine the flow rates for the basic insulating and jacketing raw materials
in accordance with the requirements of Test Method D1238. Standard conditions of test shall be as prescribed by the product
specification. If possible, obtain samples of raw materials before or during the extrusion process (but not after heating). Since
insulating and jacketing raw materials are normally obtained and used in bulk, it is usually difficult if not impossible to relate a
particular lot of raw material with a particular reel of finished wire or cable; accordingly, average raw materials values shall be
established as necessary for an appropriate manufacturing time frame, unless otherwise agreed upon between the producer and the
purchaser.
12.2 Insulation Material—Perform tests on insulation removed from finished conductors. Note that thin wall and fine gauge
insulations shall be handled carefully because of entrapped air. In the case of insulation in filled cable, the preferred method is to
obtain insulating material from conductors before they are exposed to the filling operation. If necessary, conductors obtained from
completed filled cable shall be wiped dry and free of grease or foreign material using a dry cloth (without solvent). Chop the
insulation, stripped from a conductor, as necessary to obtain specimens suitable for testing (approximately 3 g of material is
required for each test). Test the chopped material as required by Test Method D1238 to determine a melt flow rate. Run three tests
and average the results. Standard conditions of test shall be as indicated in 12.1.
12.3 Jacket Material—Jacket material used for this test must be free of filling or flooding compound. Soft filling or flooding
compounds shall be removed by thoroughly wiping the jacket specimen using a clean dry cloth (without solvent); harder filling
or flooding compounds shall be removed by cutting. Buffing is permitted to be used as a finishing operation to ensure clean and
dry specimens. Use jacketing material removed from completed cable for performing tests. Chop the jacket material removed from
the cable as is necessary to obtain specimens suitable for testing (approximately 3 g of material is required for each test). Test the
chopped material as required by Test Method D1238 to determine a melt flow rate. Run three tests and average the results. Standard
conditions of test shall be as indicated in 12.1.
D4565 − 20
12.4 Calculation—Calculate the percent increase in flow rate as follows:
M 2 M
2 1
I 5 3100 (3)
M
where:
I = increase, %,
M = melt index of raw material, and
M = melt index of material from the finished cable.
12.5 Precision and Bias—The precision and bias of this test method for measuring melt-flow rate changes are basically in
accordance with Test Method D1238.
13. Tensile and Elongation Tests
13.1 Insulation Material—Provide test specimens by removing insulation from finished conductors. (See Test Specimen section
of Test Methods D2633 for methods of removing the conductor.) Perform tests in accordance with Test Method D638 to determine
such properties as tensile strength (nominal), yield strength, and percentage elongation at break. The speed of testing shall be as
prescribed by the product specifications.
13.2 Jacket Material—Provide test specimens by die cutting jacket segments removed (cut) from finished cable. Perform testing
in accordance with Test Method D638 to determine such properties as tensile strength (nominal), yield strength and percentage
elongation at break. The speed of testing shall be as prescribed in the product specifications.
13.3 Precision and Bias—The precision and bias of these test methods for measuring tensile and elongation properties of
insulations and jackets are in accordance with Test Method D638.
14. Insulation and Jacket Shrinkback (Oven Test)
14.1 Insulation Material—Perform tests on insulated conductors. Unless otherwise specified, test a minimum of one sample of
each color of insulation from a cable. Immediately prior to testing, cut specimens 8 in. (200 mm) long from the center of a 5-ft
(1.5 m) length; then reduce them to 6 in. (150 mm) by trimming each end of the specimen. Place these specimens in a forced air
type circulating oven or in a forced convection type circulating air oven for 4 h at the temperature prescribed. The specimens shall
be placed on a layer of preheated talc or felt. At the end of the conditioning period, cool the wire to room temperature and measure
the shrinkback of the insulation. Shrinkback is defined as the total shrinkage of the insulation from both ends of the specimen in
inches (or millimetres).
14.2 Jacket Material—Perform tests on slabs cut from the cable jacket. Unless otherwise specified, cut a minimum of four test
specimens, each 2 in. (51 mm) long, 0.25 in. (6.3 mm) wide, and the same thickness as the jacket. Make the lengthwise cuts parallel
to the longitudinal axis of the cable with each specimen spaced circumferentially in 90° increments around the cable periphery.
For cables that are longitudinally shielded or armored, one of the specimens shall be cut from a portion of the jacket lying directly
over the outer shield or armor overlap. Place these specimens on a layer of preheated talc or felt in a forced-air type circulating
oven or in a forced-convection type circulating air oven for 4 h at the temperature prescribed. At the end of the conditioning period,
cool the specimens to room temperature and measure the shrinkback of the jacket material. Shrinkback is defined as the total
lengthwise shrinkage in inches (or millimetres).
14.3 Precision and Bias—No statement is made about either the precision or bias of these methods for measuring shrinkback since
the result merely states whether there is conformance to the criteria for success specified in the product specification.
15. Insulation Shrinkback (Solder Test)
15.1 Test specimens of finished insulated conductor for solder shrinkback. Unless otherwise specified, test a minimum of one
specimen of each insulation color. Immediately prior to testing, cut 8-in. (200 mm) specimens from the center of a 5-ft (1.5 m)
length and then reduce each specimen to 6 in. (150 mm) by trimming each end of the specimen. Using any convenient method,
strip 0.5 in. (13 mm) of insulation from one end of the specimen. Using a solder pot maintained at a temperature of approximately
D4565 − 20
320°C,320 °C, immerse the bared conductor to a depth of 0.25 in. (6 mm) into the molten solder and hold for a period of 20 s.
Remove the specimen and measure the amount of insulation shrinkback occurring as a result of the heat exposure. Shrinkback in
inches (or millimetres) is the total measured length of the bared conductor minus the original length of the bared conductor (0.5
in. (13 mm)).
15.2 Precision and Bias—No statement is made about either the precision or bias of this test method for measuring shrinkback
since the result merely states whether there is conformance to the criteria for success specified in the product specification.
16. Cold Bend (Insulation Only)
16.1 Preferably conduct the test in the cold chamber. Tests shall be performed on insulated conductors. The insulation shall not
show any cracks visible by normal or corrected-to-normal vision, when a specimen of insulated conductor that was conditioned
to the specified temperature for 1 h, and wrapped around the mandrel in the cooling chamber at least six adjacent turns. Test
temperature and mandrel diameter shall be as prescribed by the product specification. Bending shall be at an approximately
uniform rate so that the time consumed is not more than 1 min.
16.2 Tests shall be performed on insulated conductors. The insulation shall not show any cracks visible by normal or
corrected-to-normal vision, when a specimen of insulated conductor that has been subjected to the When the mandrel is too large
for the chamber, place the sample in the low temperature chamber for the specified temperature for 1 h, and upon removal from
the cooling low temperature chamber, is immediately woundwind around a mandrel the mandrel for the specified number of at least
six adjacent turns. Test temperature and mandrel diameter shall be as prescribed by the product specification. Bending shall be at
an approximately uniform rate so that the time consumed is not more than 1 min.
16.3 Precision and Bias—The precision of these tests has not been determined. No statement can be made about the bias of this
test method for insulation cold bend since a standard material is not available.
17. Oxidative Induction Time (Polyolefin Insulation Only)
17.1 Scope—This test method covers the determination of an Oxidative Induction Time (OIT) value for polyolefin insulation
materials removed from completed wire or cable products. This OIT value is determined by a thermoanalytical measurement of
the onset time for the exothermic oxidation of insulation in pure oxygen, at a specified temperature. For commentary and additional
information on the background, development, and significant details of this test procedure, see Appendix X1.
17.2 Summary of Test Method—This test method describes the instrument calibration procedures, sample preparation,
experimental procedure, and calculation methods for determining OIT values for polyolefin insulation materials. An insulated wire
sample is removed from a completed cable/wire product and wiped to remove filling compounds that are present in the completed
cable/wire. Two types of insulation test samples are described: Type I—Insulation stripped from wire (no copper present), or Type
II—Insulation on the wire (insulation and copper conductor).
17.2.1 Type I—Use Type I samples to measure the intrinsic stability of the material and the efficacy of thermal stabilizers such as
antioxidants.Insulation stripped from wire (no copper present), or
17.2.1.1 Use Type I samples to measure the intrinsic stability of the material and the efficacy of thermal stabilizers such as
antioxidants.
17.2.2 Type II—Use Type II samples to evaluate not only the thermal stability, but also the metal deactivation efficacy of the
additives.Insulation on the wire (insulation and copper conductor).
17.2.2.1 Use Type II samples to evaluate not only the thermal stability, but also the metal deactivation efficacy of the additives.
17.3 Significance and Use:
17.3.1 The OIT value measures the oxidative thermal stability of a material and is primarily dependent on:
17.3.1.1 The intrinsic thermal stability of the material,
17.3.1.2 The type and concentration of antioxidants and other thermal stabilizers present,
D4565 − 20
17.3.1.3 The type and concentration of metal deactivators present, and
17.3.1.4 The test temperature.
17.3.1.5 Discussion—Potentially, other components in the insulation material cause secondary effects. The OIT value for an
insulation has the potential to be significantly altered by additives such as pigments, fillers, and processing aids as well as catalyst
residues from the cable, wire, insulation, or resin manufacture. The OIT value increases or decreases depending on whether these
additives and residues act as oxidation inhibitors or promoters at the test temperature. At typical test temperatures (for example,
170 to 220°C), 220 °C), compounds present in the polyolefin material have the potential to decompose and change the polyolefin
oxidation mechanism and thereby the OIT value. If the oxidation mechanism is so altered, then the OIT value will not necessarily
correlate to aging at normal use temperatures. Before using the OIT value to predict field performance and lifetimes, it is suggested
that additional studies be undertaken to establish a correlation between the OIT value measured at high temperature and the
performance of the polyolefin under typical field conditions.
17.3.2 The OIT value is useful as a product performance test, quality control parameter, or a research and development tool for
polyolefin materials.
17.4 Apparatus, Reagents and Materials:
17.4.1 Calorimeter—This OIT Test is performed using commercial analyzers known as Differential Scanning Calorimeters
(DSCs) (Note 3) which measure heat flow as a function of time and temperature. A DSC with isothermal control and specimen
temperature precision of at least 60.1°C 60.1 °C is required.
NOTE 3—Perkin Elmer’s Differential Scanning Calorimeters and TA Instruments Differential Thermal Analyzer with a DSC cell have been found to
produce acceptable results. Equivalent equipment producing comparable results may be used.
NOTE 4—This test requires accurate temperature and atmosphere control in the DSC specimen compartment. DSC manufacturers offer choices in cell
configuration and temperature control parameters that affect this required control. For example, in some power compensation DSCs, use of the two-hole
platinum specimen holder lids with a special “flow-through” swing-away block cover is required. Consult equipment-specific literature and with the
equipment manufacturer to optimize the operation of individual DSCs for this test.
17.4.2 Nitrogen—Use cylinder nitrogen (99.9 % purity or better) for purging of cells.
17.4.3 Oxygen—Use cylinder oxygen (99.9 % purity or better) during the oxidation stage.
NOTE 5—Do not use house gases that are piped throughout buildings since their purity varies significantly.
17.4.4 Pans—Standard aluminum DSC pans (6 mm in diameter) are required to hold specimens during testing.
NOTE 6—Do not use copper pans because the variable oxidation state of the copper leads to imprecision in determination of the OIT value. Do not use
metal screens (for example stainless steel mesh) since they act as pro- or anti-oxidants and have the potential to reduce precision and accuracy of the OIT
measurement.
17.4.4.1 Degreasing—To degrease pans, wash in Reagent Grade acetone for 1 min and dry in a stream of dry nitrogen. Use
sufficient acetone to thoroughly wash the pans, that is, ;200 mL/100 pans. Ultrasonic cleaning of the pans in acetone is acceptable.
17.4.5 Temperature Standards—Use pure (>99.9 %) indium and tin as temperature calibration standards. See Table 1.
A
TABLE 1 Literature Values for Calibration Standards
Melting Temperature, °C Heat of Fusion (J/g)
Calibration Standard
T ΔH
m m
Indium (In) 156.61 28.7
Tin (Sn) 232.0 60.7
A
Rossini, F. D., Applied Chemistry, Vol 22, 1970, p. 557; Gronwold, F., Acta Chem.
Scand.Chemica Scandinavica, Vol 21, 1967, p. 1695; Gronwold, F, J. Therm.
Journal of Thermal Analysis, Vol 13, 1978, p. 419; Gronwold, F., Pure and Applied
Chemistry, 1992.
D4565 − 20
17.4.6 Balance—An analytical balance to weigh specimens with a sensitivity of 60.1 mg or better.
17.5 Instrument Calibration:
17.5.1 Instrument Preparation—Clean instrument cells between testing of different material formulations. Follow the instrument
manual procedure for cleaning cells or hold the cells at 530°C 530 °C for 10 min in oxygen.
17.5.2 Temperature Calibration—Follow the instrument manual procedures for temperature calibration of the instrument using the
following heating programs and calibration criteria.
17.5.2.1 Indium—The experimental sequence for the indium calibration is:
(1) Equilibrate at 50°C 50 °C (in nitrogen).
(2) Heat at 10°C/min 10 °C/min from 50 to 145°C.145 °C.
(3) Heat at 1°C/min 1 °C/min from 145 to 165°C.165 °C.
(4) Cool specimen to below 50°C.50 °C.
(5) Repeat steps (1) through (4).
(6) Use melting temperatures and heat of fusion from second scan for calibration purposes.
17.5.2.2 Tin—The experimental sequence for the tin calibration is:
(1) Equilibrate at 50°C 50 °C (in nitrogen).
(2) Heat at 10°C/min 10 °C/min from 50 to 220°C.220 °C.
(3) Heat at 1°C/min 1 °C/min from 220 to 240°C.240 °C.
(4) Cool specimen to below 50°C.50 °C.
(5) Repeat steps (1) through (4).
(6) Use melting temperatures and heat of fusion from second scan for calibration purposes.
17.5.2.3 Melting Temperature—For calibration purposes, define the melting temperature as the extrapolated onset of the melting
peak, not the peak maximum (see Fig. 1).
17.5.3 Calibration Criteria—An instrument in calibration will validate the melting temperatures of pure indium and pure tin at
156.6 6 0.2°C 0.2 °C and 232.0 6 0.5°C, 0.5 °C, respectively. In addition, the heat of fusion for indium and tin will be 28.7 6
0.8 J/g and 60.7 6 2.0 J/g, respectively. Check the instrument calibration every one to two months or more frequently since this
test requires accurate temperature control. (See Note 34.)
17.5.4 Gas Flow Rate—Use an oxygen flow rate of 50 6 5 mL ⁄min as measured with a bubble meter or calibrated rotameter. Other
flow rates between 50 and 200 mL/min are permitted, but must be reported.
NOTE 7—It is desirable that the tubing connecting the gas switching point and the calorimeter cell have an inside volume less than 20 mL.20 mL.
NOTE 8—The average OIT value at 100 mL/min was ;3 % lower than the OIT measured at 50 mL/min. OIT values determined at 100 mL/min had ;5 %
FIG. 1 Indium Calibration
D4565 − 20
improved precision over OIT values obtained at 50 mL/min.
17.5.5 Test Temperature—If possible, run a blank specimen to ensure that the instrument can maintain the test temperature within
60.3°C. 60.3 °C. Heat the cell to the desired test temperature (typically 200°C) 200 °C) and monitor the specimen temperature
for 10 min. If necessary, refer to 17.7.6 for procedural strategies to make the measured specimen temperature equal to the desired
test temperature.
17.6 Sample Preparation:
17.6.1 Insulated Wire Sample—Remove the insulated wires from completed wire or cable products by removing the outer cable
sheath, inner metallic shields, and any core wraps. Split the outer cable sheath lengthwise, and peel open the sheath and any
metallic shields to reveal the inner core with the insulated wire pairs.
17.6.2 Sample Cleaning—Wipe the insulated wire sample with a clean cotton cloth or paper towel to remove any filling
compound. Do not use solvents to clean the insulated wire.
17.6.3 Sample Type—Determine the OIT value for an insulation using either a: either: Type I sample—Insulation stripped from
the copper wire (see 13.1), or Type II sample—Insulated wire (insulation and copper wire).
17.6.3.1 Type I Sample—Insulation stripped from the copper wire (see 13.1), or
17.6.3.2 Type II Sample—Insulated wire (insulation and copper wire).
17.6.4 Specimen/Pan Arrangements—Use a single 5 to 6 mm long specimen of insulation (or insulated wire). The length is such
that the specimen fits neatly into the pan. (See Fig. 2).
17.6.5 Specimen Weight—Record the specimen weight to 60.1 mg.
NOTE 9—To determine the insulation sample weight, strip a 100 mm section of the insulated wire and weigh the stripped insulation. Divide the insulation
weight by the sample length to determine the insulation weight per mm (W ). Multiplying the specimen length (5 to 6 mm) by this factor (W ) will give
i i
the weight for the insulation specimen.
17.7 Procedure:
17.7.1 Load Specimens—Place the specimen (specimen and pan) in the specimen position and an empty aluminum pan in the
reference position of the instrument.
17.7.2 Initial Temperature—Equilibrate the specimen at or below 60°C.60 °C.
17.7.3 Flush Cell—Hold at this initial temperature for 5 min while the nitrogen purge flushes the cell at a flow rate of ;50 to 60
mL/min.
17.7.4 Heat to Test Temperature—Heat at 20°C/min 20 °C/min to the test temperature (typically 200°C) 200 °C) with nitrogen gas
purging the DSC cell.
FIG. 2 Specimen/Pan Arrangement
D4565 − 20
NOTE 10—The endothermic peak observed during this heating stage is the melting transition of the polyolefin and can be used for identification (for
example, to distinguish between high-density polyethylene, low-density polyethylene, and polypropylenes).
17.7.5 Gas Switch—Hold at test temperature for 5 min to establish thermal equilibrium after which switch from the nitrogen purge
to pure oxygen at a flow rate of 50 6 5 mL/min. Define this switch time as T . Measure the Oxidative Induction Time (OIT) from
this time (T ).
17.7.6 Specimen Test Temperature—If possible, record the specimen temperature 5 min after T with a precision of
60.1°C60.1 °C or better. The specimen temperature must be within 60.3°C60.3 °C of the desired test temperature. If this
temperature is more than 60.3°C60.3 °C from the required test temperature, prepare a new specimen and modify the temperature
program to ensure OIT measurement is made at the required temperature.
NOTE 11—If 200.0°C 200.0 °C was the desired test temperature and the temperature at T + 5 min was 200.7°C, 200.7 °C, then set the upper limit of the
temperature program to 199.3°C 199.3 °C to correct for the overshoot of the instrument. Alternatively, monitor and adjust the specimen temperature
continuously during the experiment to maintain the desired temperature within 60.3°C.60.3 °C.
17.7.7 Specimen Scan—Continue the test in pure oxygen until the exothermic peak is observed (on the chart recorder or computer
screen).
17.7.8 Data Collection—Plot the data normalized as heat flow (W/g) versus time. Expand the x-axis as much as possible to
facilitate analysis. Vary the y-axis depending on the procedure used to determine the OIT (see 17.8).
17.8 OIT Calculation—Use either of the following two procedures to determine the Oxidative Induction Time (OIT) values for
the specimens.
NOTE 12—The OIT calculation uses a threshold measure to define the incipient point for the polyolefin oxidation. The OIT calculation defines the onset
1 2
of the major exothermic reaction (that is, the autocatalytic oxidation reaction).
17.8.1 Procedure 1—OIT (Offset Method):
17.8.1.1 Plot data with a full scale y-axis of 1.0 W/g (or smaller). (See Fig. 3.)
17.8.1.2 Expand the x-axis so that full scale on the x-axis ranges from T − 2 min to 5 to 10 min past the onset of the oxidation
exotherm. This expansion helps to assist in analysis by the offset procedure.
17.8.1.3 Draw an extension to the baseline extrapolating any instrument drift. For an example see dashed line (a) in Fig. 3.
FIG. 3 OIT Offset Method
D4565 − 20
17.8.1.4 Draw a second line parallel to baseline (a) at a distance of 0.05 W/g above the baseline. See dashed line (b) in Fig. 3.
17.8.1.5 The intersection of the dashed line (b) with the signal trace is defined as the onset of oxidative degradation and is denoted
as T .
17.8.1.6 The Oxidative Induction Time by the offset procedure is defined as the time from oxygen introduction (T ) to this onset:
OIT ~offset!5 T 2 T (4)
1 1 0
17.8.2 Procedure 2—OIT (Tangent Method):
17.8.2.1 Plot data with a y-axis sufficient to show full melting endotherm of the polyolefin and the oxidation endotherm. For a 5
mg polyolefin specimen, a y-axis of 4 to 5 W/g is adequate.
17.8.2.2 Draw an extension to the baseline extrapolating any signal drift. For an example see dashed line (c) in Fig. 4.
17.8.2.3 Draw a tangent (dashed line (d) in Fig. 4) at the inflection point of the exothermic peak and extend this tangent to intersect
the baseline (c).
TABLE 2 Summary of Precision Data
Reproducibility
Repeatability Within
A
Mean OIT
Sample (Five
Laboratory-to-
Laboratory (σ )
specimens were run Value l
Laboratory (σ )
R
for each sample)
(min)
(min) (%) (min) (%)
HDPE Insulation
(stripped from wire)
OIT 121.6 4.5 3.7 7.3 6.0
OIT 126.4 2.8 2.2 7.2 5.7
HDPE Insulation
(with copper wire)
OIT 62.6 6.2 10.0 10.0 16.0
OIT 69.5 3.6 5.2 8.6 12.3
A
Five specimens were run for each sample
17.8.2.4 The point of intersection is the onset of oxidative degradation by the tangent method. This onset time is denoted as T .
17.8.2.5 The Oxidative Induction Time by the tangent procedure is defined as the time from oxygen introduction (T ) to this onset
time.
OIT tangent 5 T 2 T (5)
~ !
2 2 0
17.9 Report:
FIG. 4 OIT Tangent Method
D4565 − 20
17.9.1 Report the following information:
17.9.1.1 Melting temperatures (°C) for indium and tin together with the date of the last determination,
17.9.1.2 Heats of fusion (J/g) for indium and tin together with the date of the last determination,
17.9.1.3 Gas flow rate (mL/min),
17.9.1.4 Parameters for each specimen (stripped insulation, insulated wire, specimen mass, and so forth),
17.9.1.5 Specimen temperature 5 min after gas switch to oxygen (T + 5 min), and
17.9.1.6 OIT (offset) or OIT (tangent). (Unless otherwise specified by the user, the reported OIT shall be OIT , tangent method.)
1 2 2
17.9.1.7 If multiple specimens are tested, report average OIT values and standard deviations.
17.10 Precision and Bias:
17.10.1 Precision—The precision of this test method for measuring Oxidative Induction Time, using Type I and Type II samples,
is illustrated in Table 2. These statistics were determined from round robin studies between thirteen laboratories using both
heat-flux and power-compensated thermal analyzers. All data and reports of the task force that developed this test method are on
3,4
file at ASTM.
NOTE 12—The task force summarized its finding in a paper by V. J. Kuck published in the Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Plastics
in Telecommunications (Pub. Plastics & Rubber Institute, London, England), September, 1992.
17.10.2 Bias—The test for oxidative induction time has no bias since it is defined in terms of this test method.
NOTE 13—This test method employs indium and tin as internal standards for calibration of temperature and caloric sensing, and requires strict control
of the test conditions to increase precision and hopefully to reduce the bias in the OIT measurement. However, as is mentioned in 17.3 and in Appendix
X1, materials which are in the polyolefin have the potential to decompose at the high temperatures used, causing a shift of the OIT from the value for
the polyolefin. Such a shift is important in the use of this test method for quality control of the polyolefin compound. It is important to recognize that
the same shift is a bias when the test is used to measure the OIT of the polyolefin.
18. Oxygen Induction Time (Cable Filling Compound Only)
18.1 Scope—This test method covers a procedure for determining, by thermal analysis, the oxidative induction time of filling
compound removed from completed wire or cable.
NOTE 14—For additional information on wire and cable filling compounds, refer to Specifications D4731 and D4732.
18.2 Apparatus, Reagents, and Materials:
18.2.1 This test is normally performed using commercial devices commonly referred to as Differential Scanning Calorimeters
(DSC) or as Differential Thermal Analyzers (DTA). Use of another apparatus is permitted if it is demonstrated to yield comparable
results. The following reagents and materials are also required to perform this test:
18.2.1.1 Use commercial cylinder nitrogen for purging instrument cells.
18.2.1.2 Use oxygen in this test method equal to or better than 99.6 % extra dry grade.
18.2.1.3 Small specimen pans are required to hold the specimens while in the instrument cells. Pans shall be aluminum.
Supporting data have been filed at ASTM International Headquarters and may be obtained by requesting Research Report RR:D09-1034. Contact ASTM Customer
Service at service@astm.org.
The task force summarized its finding in a paper by V. J. Kuck published in the Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Plastics in Telecommunications (Pub.
Plastics & Rubber Institute, London, England), September, 1992.
D4565 − 20
18.2.1.4 Use No. 316 stainless steel screen (40 mesh) to cover specimens in the pans.
18.2.1.5 Use pure metal standards such as indium, tin, lead, or zinc for instrument calibrations as recommended by the instrument
manufacturer.
18.3 Sample Preparation—Select at random a short-length section, approximately 1 ft (300 mm) long, of completed wire or cable.
Remove the core from the wire or cable section; accomplish this by pulling or pushing the core out without cutting the jacket.
Remove the filling compound from the core and isolate it from the cable or wires so as not to contaminate the compound. Obtain
all samples of filling compound by taking them from manufactured cable or wire rather than by obtaining them in an unprocessed
condition.
18.4 Instrument Preparation—Clean the instrument cells after they have been standing overnight and between the testing of
different material formulations. To clean the cells, bring them up to temperature and hold them at approximately 400°C 400 °C
for a period of 10 min in nitrogen.
18.5 Instrument Calibration—Adjust temperature scales according to instrument manual instructions until the determined melting
point of pure indium metal is indicated as 156.6°C 156.6 °C at a heating rate of 5°C/min.5 °C/min.
NOTE 15—This note on calibration is written specifically for the instruments described in footnote 3. It is possible that other equipment is equally suitable
but yields somewhat different results when testing identical specimens. For the Perkin-Elmer DSC, run several pure metal standards (such as, indium,
tin, lead, zinc) through their melting point at a heating rate of 5°C/min. 5 °C/min. Plot melting temperatures and interpolate to find the required set point.
Repeat calibrations require only adjustments for the indium melt temperature.
For the TA Instruments DTA with a DSC Cell, set the instrument in the isothermal mode and calibrate the starting-temperature dial according to the
instrument manual. Alternately, set the dial to a reading that results in a corrected thermocouple read-out of the required temperature.
18.6 Preparation—Place 3 to 5 mg of the filling material to be tested into an aluminum pan and cover this with a clean stainless
steel screen. Crimp the pan to hold the screen in place.
18.7 Place the prepared specimen pan in the instrument cell. Flush the cell for 5 min using cylinder nitrogen at a flow rate of 200
6 25 cm /min. Following the nitrogen purge, increase the cell-specimen temperature (at a heating rate of 10°C/min) 10 °C/min)
from the initial temperature to 190 6 2°C. 2 °C. Once temperature equilibrium of 190°C 190 °C has been reached (steady recorder
signal), switch to oxygen flow at the same flow rate and simultaneousl
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

Loading comments...