2017/625 - Regulation (EU) 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2017 on official controls and other official activities performed to ensure the application of food and feed law, rules on animal health and welfare, plant health and plant protection products
Regulation (EU) 2017/625 establishes a comprehensive and harmonized framework for official controls and other official activities in the EU’s agri-food chain to ensure the application of food and feed law, animal health and welfare rules, plant health, and plant protection regulations. It repeals previous overlapping regulations to streamline and improve the efficiency and consistency of enforcement actions. The Regulation mandates that competent authorities in Member States conduct regular, risk-based controls covering all stages of production, processing, and distribution to verify compliance with Union agri-food chain legislation. It also requires the designation of competent authorities who act impartially and professionally, with trained staff, to safeguard public, animal, and plant health while protecting consumer interests and the internal market. The Regulation incorporates measures addressing antimicrobial resistance, animal welfare, plant health, and environmental safety regarding GMOs and plant protection products. It emphasizes transparency, confidentiality, and provides operators the right to appeal against decisions. Overall, it enhances the protection of human, animal, and plant health and the environment through consistent official control mechanisms across the Union.
Purpose
Regulation (EU) 2017/625 aims to establish a harmonised Union framework for official controls and other official activities to ensure effective application of food and feed law, animal health and welfare rules, plant health, and plant protection product legislation across the agri-food chain. It consolidates and replaces earlier legislation governing official controls to improve efficiency, transparency, and consistency in enforcement. The regulation’s ultimate objective is to guarantee a high level of protection of human and animal health, consumer interests, animal welfare, plant health, environmental safety, and the smooth functioning of the internal market.
Key obligations
- Competent Authorities Designation: Member States must designate competent authorities responsible for official controls and other official activities, ensuring appropriate resources, impartiality, and professionalism.
- Official Controls: Competent authorities must conduct official controls regularly, risk-based, and with appropriate frequency covering all sectors under Union agri-food chain legislation. Controls verify compliance by operators at every stage of production, processing, and distribution.
- Other Official Activities: Beyond controls, authorities must carry out activities such as authorisations, disease surveillance, eradication measures, and issuance of official certificates or attestations.
- Training and Audits: Staff performing official controls must receive regular training on the legislation and control obligations. Competent authorities must conduct internal or independent audits to ensure compliance with this Regulation.
- Professional Secrecy and Data Protection: Staff must maintain professional secrecy regarding information acquired during controls except in cases where disclosure is justified by overriding public interests or legal obligations, preserving protection of personal data as per EU rules.
- Communication and Coordination: Member States must designate a single competent authority per area to ensure effective coordination with other Member States and the European Commission.
- Non-compliance Measures: Competent authorities have the duty to identify, prevent, and address fraudulent or deceptive practices that could compromise consumer protection and market integrity.
- Right of Appeal: Operators must be informed of their rights to appeal decisions taken by competent authorities under national law.
- No Prior Notice of Controls: Controls should normally be performed without prior notice unless absolutely necessary to carry them out effectively.
Affected products and actors
- Food and Feed Products: All food and feed products subject to Union legislation ensuring safety and wholesomeness.
- Animal Health and Welfare: Includes live animals and animal products, ensuring compliance with animal health standards, disease eradication measures, and welfare requirements.
- Plant Health: Covers plants and plant products, focusing on prevention and control of plant pests and diseases.
- Plant Protection Products: Pesticides and related substances, covering their authorisation, marketing, use, and control.
- Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs): Including GM food, feed, and seeds regulated under specific Union rules.
- Operators throughout the agri-food chain: These include all stages of production, processing, distribution, and marketing within the Union agri-food sector.
- Competent Authorities: Public bodies designated by Member States responsible for official controls and related official activities.
Implementation timeline
- Regulation (EU) 2017/625 entered into force 20 days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
- It repealed previous official controls regulations (EC) No 854/2004 and (EC) No 882/2004 and various Council Directives.
- Member States were required to designate competent authorities promptly to comply with the Regulation.
- Transitional provisions and phasing-out of previous legislation allowed gradual integration of controls and official activities under this Regulation.
- Ongoing updates, training, and audits are expected to be maintained continuously to ensure compliance and effectiveness over time.
The Regulation (EU) 2017/625 applies to official controls and other official activities performed to ensure compliance with Union legislation related to food and feed law, animal health and welfare, plant health, and plant protection products. It covers the entire agri-food chain including production, processing, distribution, and trade of food and feed, as well as animal products and plants. The scope encompasses activities that impact food and feed safety, consumer protection, animal welfare, prevention of the spread of transmissible animal diseases, control of plant pests, and environmental protection from genetically modified organisms and plant protection products. It also covers official controls related to the marketing standards for fishery, aquaculture, and agricultural products, organic production, agricultural quality schemes, and the issuance of official certificates and attestations. The Regulation ensures harmonized official controls throughout the EU, focusing on risk-based inspections and enforcement across all relevant sectors and operators in the agri-food chain.
Die Verordnung (EU) 2017/625 legt ein harmonisiertes System amtlicher Kontrollen und weiterer amtlicher Tätigkeiten entlang der gesamten Lebensmittelkette fest, um die Einhaltung der Unionsvorschriften im Bereich Lebens- und Futtermittelrecht, Tiergesundheit, Tierschutz, Pflanzengesundheit und Pflanzenschutzmittel sicherzustellen. Sie ersetzt frühere Regelungen und zielt darauf ab, ein hohes Schutzniveau für menschliche und tierische Gesundheit sowie die Umwelt zu gewährleisten. Die Verordnung vereinfacht und bündelt bestehende Kontrollen, stärkt die Zusammenarbeit der zuständigen Behörden, fordert die regelmäßige Schulung des Kontrollpersonals und verpflichtet zur Durchführung interner Audits. Sie berücksichtigt die biologische Vielfalt, den Schutz vor Antibiotikaresistenzen und fördert den Schutz fühlender Tiere gemäß Art. 13 AEUV. Mit Blick auf den Binnenmarkt stellt sie sicher, dass Kontrollen einheitlich durchgeführt werden, um Verbraucherschutz zu verbessern und das Funktionieren des Binnenmarktes zu unterstützen. Unternehmer sind verpflichtet, die relevanten Vorschriften einzuhalten und können gegen Behördenentscheidungen Rechtsmittel einlegen. Die Verordnung stärkt insgesamt die Kontrolle und Durchsetzung von Rechtsvorschriften zum Schutz von Gesundheit, Tierwohl und Umwelt in der EU.
Zweck
Die Verordnung (EU) 2017/625 hat zum Ziel, einen harmonisierten Rechtsrahmen für amtliche Kontrollen und andere amtliche Tätigkeiten innerhalb der EU zu schaffen, um die Anwendung der Unionsvorschriften im Bereich Lebens- und Futtermittelrecht, Tiergesundheit, Tierschutz, Pflanzengesundheit und Pflanzenschutzmittel sicherzustellen. Sie ersetzt und bündelt frühere Verordnungen und Richtlinien, um die Effektivität und Kohärenz der Kontrollen zu verbessern. Mit ihr soll ein hohes Schutzniveau für die Gesundheit von Menschen, Tieren und Pflanzen gewährleistet und gleichzeitig der Binnenmarkt geschützt und gefördert werden.
Wichtige Verpflichtungen
- Amtliche Kontrollen: Die Mitgliedstaaten sind verpflichtet, amtliche Kontrollen umfassend und effektiv durchzuführen, um die Einhaltung der Unionsvorschriften entlang der gesamten Lebensmittelkette sicherzustellen.
- Benennung zuständiger Behörden: Mitgliedstaaten müssen zuständige Behörden bestimmen, die für die Durchführung der Kontrollen und anderer amtlicher Tätigkeiten verantwortlich sind. Zudem ist eine zentrale Behörde zu benennen, die die Koordination sicherstellt.
- Unparteilichkeit und Professionalität: Die zuständigen Behörden müssen im öffentlichen Interesse handeln, über angemessene Ressourcen und Kompetenzen verfügen sowie Garantien für Unparteilichkeit und Qualität der Kontrollen bieten.
- Schulung des Personals: Das Kontrollpersonal muss regelmäßig geschult werden, um über die jeweiligen Rechtsvorschriften und Verfahrenspflichten informiert zu sein.
- Interne Audits: Die zuständigen Behörden müssen interne Audits durchführen oder durchführen lassen, um die Einhaltung der Verordnung transparent und überprüfbar sicherzustellen.
- Schutz vertraulicher Informationen: Die Verordnung sieht vor, dass personenbezogene und unternehmensbezogene Informationen, die bei Kontrollen erlangt werden, der beruflichen Geheimhaltungspflicht unterliegen. Informationen zu Kontrollergebnissen dürfen nur mit Zustimmung des betroffenen Unternehmers oder nach Abwägung eines übergeordneten öffentlichen Interesses weitergegeben werden.
- Rechtsbehelfe: Unternehmer haben das Recht, gegen Entscheidungen der zuständigen Behörden Rechtsmittel einzulegen und müssen über dieses Recht informiert werden.
Betroffene Produkte und Akteure
- Lebens- und Futtermittel: Alle Stufen der Herstellung, Verarbeitung und des Vertriebs tierischer und pflanzlicher Produkte.
- Tiergesundheit und Tierschutz: Tierhalter, Veterinärkontrollen, Meldepflichten und Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung von Tierseuchen.
- Pflanzengesundheit: Schutz vor Pflanzenschädlingen, Pflanzenschutzmittel, Überwachung und Einsatz von gesundheitlichen Schutzmaßnahmen.
- Gentechnisch veränderte Organismen (GVO): Erstprüfung, Zulassung und Kontrolle sowie Rückverfolgbarkeit von GVO in Lebens- und Futtermitteln.
- Pflanzenschutzmittel: Genehmigung, Inverkehrbringen, Verwendung und Kontrolle von Pflanzenschutzmitteln und ihren Wirkstoffen.
- Unternehmer: Personen und Unternehmen, die in den genannten Bereichen Produkte erzeugen, verarbeiten, vertreiben oder handeln.
- Zuständige Behörden: Nationale Behörden, die Kontrollen durchführen und die Rechtskonformität sicherstellen.
Umsetzungszeitplan
Diese Verordnung trat am 14. Dezember 2019 in Kraft. Mitgliedstaaten mussten die neuen Regelungen unmittelbar anwenden und die bestehenden Vorgaben für amtliche Kontrollen entsprechend anpassen. Die Verordnung ersetzt damit zuvor geltende Verordnungen und Richtlinien in diesem Bereich, insbesondere die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 882/2004 sowie weitere sektorspezifische Rechtsakte. Die Mitgliedstaaten sind seitdem dafür verantwortlich, die in der Verordnung festgelegten Anforderungen umzusetzen, zuständige Behörden zu benennen und das Kontrollsystem auszubauen. Weiterhin sind sie verpflichtet, das Personal zu schulen und die Qualität der Kontrollen durch interne Audits zu gewährleisten.
Die Verordnung (EU) 2017/625 gilt für amtliche Kontrollen und andere amtliche Tätigkeiten zur Gewährleistung der Anwendung des Lebens- und Futtermittelrechts sowie der Vorschriften über Tiergesundheit, Tierschutz, Pflanzengesundheit und Pflanzenschutzmittel. Sie findet Anwendung auf alle Stufen der Lebensmittelkette, einschließlich der Produktion, Verarbeitung, Lagerung, Verteilung und Vermarktung von Lebens- und Futtermitteln, tierischen Erzeugnissen, Pflanzen und Pflanzenerzeugnissen. Zudem umfasst sie Tätigkeiten im Bereich Tiergesundheit, wie Seuchenbekämpfung, Veterinärkontrollen und das Meldesystem, sowie Maßnahmen zum Schutz des Tierwohls und der Umwelt vor Risiken, die von genetisch veränderten Organismen (GVO) und Pflanzenschutzmitteln ausgehen. Ausgenommen sind bestimmte Kontrollen im Zusammenhang mit der gemeinsamen Marktorganisation für landwirtschaftliche Erzeugnisse, soweit sie nicht betrügerische Praktiken betreffen. Die Verordnung zielt auf ein hohes Niveau des Schutzes von Gesundheit, Tierschutz und Umwelt innerhalb der EU ab und trägt zur einheitlichen Anwendung und Durchsetzung der Unionsvorschriften bei.
Le règlement (UE) 2017/625 établit un cadre harmonisé pour l'organisation des contrôles officiels et autres activités officielles garantissant le respect de la législation de l'Union européenne relative à la chaîne agroalimentaire. Il couvre la sécurité des denrées alimentaires et des aliments pour animaux, la santé et le bien-être des animaux, la santé des végétaux ainsi que la réglementation des produits phytopharmaceutiques et organismes génétiquement modifiés. Ce texte remplace et intègre plusieurs règlements et directives antérieurs, afin de simplifier et renforcer la cohérence des contrôles officiels à travers l'Union. Il impose aux États membres de désigner des autorités compétentes responsables de la mise en œuvre des contrôles, de garantir leur impartialité, professionnalisme et ressources suffisantes, ainsi que de former régulièrement le personnel. Le règlement vise à assurer un niveau élevé de protection de la santé publique, animale et végétale tout en facilitant le bon fonctionnement du marché intérieur, en promouvant la sécurité sanitaire, la protection de l'environnement, et la lutte contre la résistance aux antimicrobiens. Il inclut également des dispositions sur la confidentialité des informations recueillies durant les contrôles et les droits de recours des opérateurs.
Objet
Le règlement (UE) 2017/625 établit un cadre harmonisé au niveau de l'Union européenne pour l'organisation des contrôles officiels et des autres activités officielles visant à assurer le respect de la législation relative à la chaîne agroalimentaire. Cette législation englobe la sécurité alimentaire, la santé et le bien-être des animaux, la santé des végétaux, ainsi que les produits phytopharmaceutiques. Ce règlement remplace et intègre plusieurs actes législatifs antérieurs liés aux contrôles officiels, afin de simplifier et rationaliser le cadre législatif, tout en renforçant la protection de la santé humaine, animale et de l'environnement.
Obligations principales
Organisation des contrôles officiels : Les États membres doivent désigner des autorités compétentes dotées de ressources suffisantes, d'équipements adéquats et de garanties d'impartialité et de professionnalisme pour réaliser les contrôles le long de la chaîne agroalimentaire.
Réalisation des contrôles officiels : Ces contrôles visent à vérifier la conformité des opérateurs avec la législation de l’UE sur les denrées alimentaires, les aliments pour animaux, la santé et le bien-être des animaux, la santé des végétaux, et les produits phytopharmaceutiques.
Autres activités officielles : Les États membres doivent également organiser des activités officielles complémentaires telles que la délivrance d'autorisations, la surveillance épidémiologique, les mesures d'éradication, et la délivrance de certificats officiels.
Formation du personnel : Le personnel chargé des contrôles et autres activités doit être régulièrement formé sur la législation applicable et sur les exigences du règlement.
Audits : Les autorités compétentes doivent réaliser des audits internes (ou en faire réaliser en leur nom) pour assurer la conformité avec le règlement, de façon transparente et sous examen indépendant.
Droits des opérateurs : Les opérateurs doivent être informés des procédures d'appel disponibles en cas de décisions des autorités compétentes.
Confidentialité : Le personnel effectuant les contrôles doit respecter le secret professionnel concernant les informations recueillies.
Produits et acteurs concernés
Produits visés : Denrées alimentaires, aliments pour animaux, animaux vivants, végétaux, produits végétaux, produits phytopharmaceutiques, et OGM utilisés dans la chaîne agroalimentaire.
Acteurs concernés : Tous les opérateurs économiques impliqués à toutes les étapes de la production, transformation et distribution des produits mentionnés, ainsi que les autorités compétentes désignées par les États membres pour exécuter les contrôles et autres activités officielles.
Champ d'application élargi : Intègre des domaines liés à la santé animale, la santé des végétaux, le bien-être animal, les produits phytopharmaceutiques, ainsi que les normes de commercialisation.
Calendrier de mise en œuvre
Le règlement est entré en vigueur le 14 décembre 2019.
Les États membres doivent se conformer aux obligations fixées par le règlement à partir de cette date, en procédant notamment à la désignation des autorités compétentes et en organisant les contrôles conformément aux nouvelles règles harmonisées.
Le règlement abroge plusieurs textes antérieurs relatifs aux contrôles officiels (notamment le règlement 882/2004/CE), consolidant ainsi toutes les exigences en une seule base juridique.
Ce cadre harmonisé vise à renforcer la protection des consommateurs, la santé publique et animale, ainsi que la durabilité environnementale dans la chaîne agroalimentaire européenne, en assurant une surveillance efficace et cohérente à travers l'Union européenne.
La directive 2017/625 s'applique aux contrôles officiels et autres activités officielles visant à garantir le respect de la législation de l'Union européenne dans la chaîne agroalimentaire. Elle couvre les denrées alimentaires, les aliments pour animaux, la santé et le bien-être des animaux, la santé des végétaux, ainsi que les produits phytopharmaceutiques. Elle englobe tous les secteurs liés à la production, la transformation, la distribution et la commercialisation agricoles, y compris les produits d'origine animale, les végétaux, les organismes génétiquement modifiés (OGM), les produits phytopharmaceutiques et les systèmes de qualité biologiques. Cette directive concerne également la prévention et le contrôle des maladies animales, la sécurité sanitaire des aliments et des aliments pour animaux, la protection de l’environnement, et la gestion des risques liés aux OGM et aux produits phytopharmaceutiques. Elle s’applique à toutes les étapes de la chaîne agroalimentaire en vue d’assurer la conformité aux règles de l’Union dans ces domaines.
Uredba (EU) 2017/625 vzpostavlja usklajen okvir za izvajanje uradnega nadzora in drugih uradnih dejavnosti na področju zakonodaje o živilih in krmi, zdravju in dobrobiti živali ter zdravju rastlin in fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v Evropski uniji. Namen je zagotoviti visoko raven varstva zdravja ljudi, živali in rastlin, varstvo okolja ter pošteno delovanje notranjega trga. Uredba združuje in nadomešča prejšnje pravne akte, poenostavlja nadzor ter krepi učinkovitost organov držav članic pri spremljanju skladnosti s predpisi. Določa odgovornosti pristojnih organov za redno, tveganju prilagojeno in učinkovit nadzor izvajalcev dejavnosti v vseh fazah agroživilske verige, vključno z nadzorom nad uporabo veterinarskih zdravil in fitofarmacevtskih sredstev. Pravice izvajalcev dejavnosti in varstvo poslovnih skrivnosti so zagotovljeni, medtem ko je poudarek na nepristranskosti, strokovnosti in rednem usposabljanju nadzorovanega osebja. Uredba krepi sistem obveščanja, izmenjave informacij in sodelovanja med državami članicami ter Evropsko komisijo za boljši odziv na morebitna tveganja in kršitve.
Namen
Uredba (EU) 2017/625 ima cilj vzpostaviti usklajen in učinkovit sistem uradnega nadzora ter drugih uradnih dejavnosti na področju agroživilske verige znotraj Evropske unije. Namen je zagotoviti pravilno izvrševanje zakonodaje EU o živilih, krmi, zdravju in dobrobiti živali ter zdravju rastlin in fitofarmacevtskih sredstvih. S tem se varuje zdravje ljudi, živali in rastlin, dobrobit živali ter okolje, hkrati pa se podpira nemoteno delovanje notranjega trga.
Uredba konsolidira in nadomešča prejšnje akte EU, ki so urejali različno področje uradnega nadzora, s čimer racionalizira zakonodajo in zagotavlja celovit pristop k spoštovanju vseh relevantnih predpisov agroživilske verige.
Ključne obveznosti
Vzpostavitev uradnega nadzora: Države članice morajo zagotoviti, da pristojni organi izvajajo redne, učinkovite in nepristranske preglede, da se izpolnjuje zakonodaja EU na področju hrane, krme, zdravja in dobrobiti živali ter zdravja rastlin in fitofarmacevtskih sredstev.
Opredelitev pristojnih organov: Države članice določijo organe, ki so odgovorni za izvajanje nadzora in drugih uradnih dejavnosti. Pristojni organi morajo biti neodvisni, strokovni in opremljeni z ustreznimi sredstvi.
Usposabljanje osebja: Osebje, ki izvaja uradni nadzor, mora redno prejemati usposabljanja glede veljavnih predpisov in zahtev za učinkovito izvajanje nalog.
Notranje presoje: Pristojni organi izvajajo notranje presoje za zagotavljanje skladnosti z uredbo in za izboljšanje kakovosti nadzora.
Varstvo poslovne skrivnosti: Pristojni organi morajo varovati informacije, pridobljene med nadzorom, razen če je razkritje nujno za varstvo javnega interesa ali ni drugače določeno v zakonodaji.
Preverjanje skladnosti: Uradni nadzor vključuje preverjanje skladnosti glede varnosti hrane in krme, zdravja in dobrobiti živali, zdravja rastlin, uporabe fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, GSO in drugih dejavnosti v agroživilski verigi.
Pravice izvajalcev dejavnosti: Izvajalci dejavnosti imajo pravico do pritožb zoper odločitve pristojnih organov in morajo biti o tej pravici obveščeni.
Ocena tveganj: Pristojni organi prilagajajo pogostost nadzorov glede na tveganja in pričakovano skladnost, pri čemer se posebej upoštevajo goljufije ali zavajajoče prakse.
Neuporaba predhodnih obvestil: Predhodna obvestila o nadzoru se običajno ne izdajajo, razen kadar je nujno za izvedbo nadzora ali glede na vrsto dejavnosti.
Zadevni proizvodi in akterji
Proizvodi: Živila in krma, živali in izdelki živalskega izvora, rastline in rastlinski proizvodi, fitofarmacevtska sredstva, gensko spremenjeni organizmi (GSO), kmetijski proizvodi z določenimi znamkami kakovosti in ekološkimi oznakami.
Akterji: Izvajalci dejavnosti v celotni agroživilski verigi – od proizvodnje, predelave, distribucije do prodaje. Pristojni organi držav članic, ki izvajajo uradni nadzor in druge uradne dejavnosti.
Države članice: Odgovorne za organizacijo in izvajanje uradnega nadzora preko pooblaščenih pristojnih organov.
Rok izvedbe
Uredba (EU) 2017/625 je začela veljati 14 dni po objavi v Uradnem listu EU, kar je bilo 15. marec 2017. Države članice so bile dolžne uredbo implementirati takoj, saj je urejala neposredno uporabne ukrepe in nadzorne prakse v vseh fazah agroživilske verige.
Posebna časovna obdobja za prilagoditve in prenehanje uporabe predhodnih uredb in direktiv, ki jih ta uredba nadomešča (npr. Uredbi 854/2004 in 882/2004), so bila določena z namenom zagotoviti nemoten prehod na nov usklajeni sistem uradnega nadzora. Države članice so morale pravočasno določiti in opremiti pristojne organe ter zagotoviti njihovo usposobljenost za izvajanje novih zahtev.
Ta uredba je ključni pravni okvir za zagotavljanje varnosti, zdravja in kakovosti v agroživilski verigi EU, hkrati pa omogoča učinkovito upravljanje tveganj in krepi zaupanje potrošnikov v varnost hrane in povezanih proizvodov znotraj celotne Unije.
Uredba (EU) 2017/625 se uporablja za uradni nadzor in druge uradne dejavnosti v celotni agroživilski verigi, da zagotovi skladnost z zakonodajo EU o varnosti živil, krme, zdravju in dobrobiti živali ter zdravju rastlin in fitofarmacevtskih sredstvih. Velja za vse faze proizvodnje, predelave in distribucije živil in krme, dejavnosti v zvezi z zdravjem živali in rastlin ter dobrobitjo živali, varstvom okolja pred tveganji gensko spremenjenih organizmov (GSO) in uporabo fitofarmacevtskih sredstev. Uredba zajema širok spekter sektorjev, vključno z živilskimi in kmetijskimi proizvodi, veterinarsko medicino, fitosanitarno zaščito, ekološko pridelavo, shemami kakovosti, ribištvom, akvakulturo ter tržnimi standardi. Namenjena je izboljšanju učinkovitosti in usklajenosti uradnega nadzora po vsej EU, kar vključuje vse izvajalce dejavnosti in zagotavlja skladnost z zakonodajo ter zaščito zdravja ljudi, živali, rastlin in okolja.
General Information
This document specifies a method for the determination of total mercury in foodstuffs by cold vapour atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS) after pressure digestion.
This method was tested in an interlaboratory study carried out in connection with the pressure digestion method EN 13805 on seven different materials with a mercury concentration in the range from 0,006 mg/kg to 5,38 mg/kg and successfully validated in this range.
The following foodstuffs were analysed:
— Saithe (dried);
— Celery (dried);
— Wheat noodle powder;
— Wild mushrooms (dried);
— Pig liver (dried);
— Cacao powder;
— Tuna fish (dried).
The lower limit of the method’s applicability varies depending on the food matrix and the water content of the foodstuff. It is a laboratory-specific value and is defined by the laboratory when calculating the limit of quantification (see 9.2).
- Standard16 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document specifies a method for the determination of total mercury in foodstuffs by cold vapour atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS) after pressure digestion.
This method was tested in an interlaboratory study carried out in connection with the pressure digestion method EN 13805 on seven different materials with a mercury concentration in the range from 0,006 mg/kg to 5,38 mg/kg and successfully validated in this range.
The following foodstuffs were analysed:
— Saithe (dried);
— Celery (dried);
— Wheat noodle powder;
— Wild mushrooms (dried);
— Pig liver (dried);
— Cacao powder;
— Tuna fish (dried).
The lower limit of the method’s applicability varies depending on the food matrix and the water content of the foodstuff. It is a laboratory-specific value and is defined by the laboratory when calculating the limit of quantification (see 9.2).
- Standard16 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document specifies a method for the identification of single fish and fish fillets to the level of genus or species. It allows the identification of a large number of commercially important fish species using DNA barcoding.
This method was validated on raw fish. Laboratory experience indicates additional applicability to processed fish products (e.g. cold smoked, hot smoked, salted, frozen, cooked, fried and deep-fried samples).
The described method is usually unsuitable for the analysis of highly processed foods (e.g. tins of fish with highly degraded DNA where the fragment lengths are not sufficient for amplification of the targets). Furthermore, it does not apply to complex fish products containing mixtures of two or more fish species.
The identification of fish species is carried out by PCR amplification of either a segment of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (cytb) or the cytochrome c oxidase I gene (cox1, syn COI), or both, followed by sequencing of the PCR products and subsequent sequence comparison with entries in databases.
- Standard26 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document specifies a method for the identification of single fish and fish fillets to the level of genus or species. It allows the identification of a large number of commercially important fish species using DNA barcoding.
This method was validated on raw fish. Laboratory experience indicates additional applicability to processed fish products (e.g. cold smoked, hot smoked, salted, frozen, cooked, fried and deep-fried samples).
The described method is usually unsuitable for the analysis of highly processed foods (e.g. tins of fish with highly degraded DNA where the fragment lengths are not sufficient for amplification of the targets). Furthermore, it does not apply to complex fish products containing mixtures of two or more fish species.
The identification of fish species is carried out by PCR amplification of either a segment of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (cytb) or the cytochrome c oxidase I gene (cox1, syn COI), or both, followed by sequencing of the PCR products and subsequent sequence comparison with entries in databases.
- Standard26 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document specifies a method for the taxonomic identification of a single bivalve or piece of bivalve to the genus or species level using DNA barcoding. It allows the identification of a large number of commercially important bivalve species.
This method was validated on raw mussels. Laboratory experience indicates additional applicability to processed bivalve products, e.g. cold smoked, hot smoked, salted, frozen, cooked, fried, and deep-fried samples.
The described method is usually unsuitable for the analysis of highly processed foods, e.g. tins of mussels, with highly degraded DNA where the fragment lengths are not sufficient for amplification of the target. Furthermore, it is not applicable for complex seafood products containing mixtures of two or more bivalve species.
The identification of bivalve species is carried out by PCR amplification of a segment of the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene, followed by sequencing of the PCR products and subsequent sequence comparison with entries in databases.
- Standard17 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document specifies a method for the identification of meat derived from mammals and birds to the level of genus or species and allows the identification of a large number of commercially important as well as exotic meat species using DNA barcoding.
This method was validated on DNA isolated from single pieces of raw meat. This method can also be used for the identification of single meat animal species in some processed products.
The described method is unsuitable for the analysis of highly processed foods with highly degraded DNA where the fragment lengths are not sufficient for amplification of the targets. Furthermore, it is not applicable for complex meat products containing mixtures of two or more meat species.
The identification of meat species is carried out by PCR amplification of either a segment of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (cytb) or the cytochrome c oxidase I gene (cox1, syn COI) or both, followed by sequencing of the PCR products and subsequent sequence comparison with entries in databases.
- Standard20 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document specifies a method for the taxonomic identification of a single bivalve or piece of bivalve to the genus or species level using DNA barcoding. It allows the identification of a large number of commercially important bivalve species.
This method was validated on raw mussels. Laboratory experience indicates additional applicability to processed bivalve products, e.g. cold smoked, hot smoked, salted, frozen, cooked, fried, and deep-fried samples.
The described method is usually unsuitable for the analysis of highly processed foods, e.g. tins of mussels, with highly degraded DNA where the fragment lengths are not sufficient for amplification of the target. Furthermore, it is not applicable for complex seafood products containing mixtures of two or more bivalve species.
The identification of bivalve species is carried out by PCR amplification of a segment of the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene, followed by sequencing of the PCR products and subsequent sequence comparison with entries in databases.
- Standard17 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document specifies a method for the identification of meat derived from mammals and birds to the level of genus or species and allows the identification of a large number of commercially important as well as exotic meat species using DNA barcoding.
This method was validated on DNA isolated from single pieces of raw meat. This method can also be used for the identification of single meat animal species in some processed products.
The described method is unsuitable for the analysis of highly processed foods with highly degraded DNA where the fragment lengths are not sufficient for amplification of the targets. Furthermore, it is not applicable for complex meat products containing mixtures of two or more meat species.
The identification of meat species is carried out by PCR amplification of either a segment of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (cytb) or the cytochrome c oxidase I gene (cox1, syn COI) or both, followed by sequencing of the PCR products and subsequent sequence comparison with entries in databases.
- Standard20 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document specifies the detection of Clostridium (C.) perfringens.
This document is applicable to:
— products intended for human consumption;
— products intended for animal feeding;
— environmental samples in the area of food and feed production and handling;
— samples from the primary production stage.
This horizontal method was originally developed for the examination of all samples belonging to the food chain. Based on the information available at the time of publication of this document, this method is considered to be fully suited to the examination of all samples belonging to the food chain. However, because of the large variety of products in the food chain, it is possible that this horizontal method is not appropriate in every detail for all products. Nevertheless, it is expected that the required modifications are minimized so that they do not result in a significant deviation from this horizontal method.
NOTE Interlaboratory studies with a small number of participating laboratories (<10) were conducted for the following food categories:
— ready-to-eat, ready-to-reheat meat products;
— eggs and egg products (derivates);
— ready-to-eat, ready-to-reheat fishery products;
— processed fruits and vegetables;
— infant formula and infant cereals (with probiotics);
— multi-component foods or meal components.
It has also been validated with a small number of participating laboratories for the following other category:
— environmental samples (food or feed production).
Since the method is not commonly used for samples in the primary production stage, this category was not included in the interlaboratory study. Therefore, no performance characteristics were obtained for this category. The method has not been validated for the category ‘pet food and animal feed’, as the test samples used for the interlaboratory study were already naturally contaminated with C. perfringens. Given the limited number of participating laboratories in the interlaboratory studies, the calculated performance characteristics can be used as indicative values of the method performance. For detailed information on the validation, see Clause 11 and Annexes C to F.
- Technical specification42 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document specifies the detection of Clostridium (C.) perfringens.
This document is applicable to:
— products intended for human consumption;
— products intended for animal feeding;
— environmental samples in the area of food and feed production and handling;
— samples from the primary production stage.
This horizontal method was originally developed for the examination of all samples belonging to the food chain. Based on the information available at the time of publication of this document, this method is considered to be fully suited to the examination of all samples belonging to the food chain. However, because of the large variety of products in the food chain, it is possible that this horizontal method is not appropriate in every detail for all products. Nevertheless, it is expected that the required modifications are minimized so that they do not result in a significant deviation from this horizontal method.
NOTE Interlaboratory studies with a small number of participating laboratories (<10) were conducted for the following food categories:
— ready-to-eat, ready-to-reheat meat products;
— eggs and egg products (derivates);
— ready-to-eat, ready-to-reheat fishery products;
— processed fruits and vegetables;
— infant formula and infant cereals (with probiotics);
— multi-component foods or meal components.
It has also been validated with a small number of participating laboratories for the following other category:
— environmental samples (food or feed production).
Since the method is not commonly used for samples in the primary production stage, this category was not included in the interlaboratory study. Therefore, no performance characteristics were obtained for this category. The method has not been validated for the category ‘pet food and animal feed’, as the test samples used for the interlaboratory study were already naturally contaminated with C. perfringens. Given the limited number of participating laboratories in the interlaboratory studies, the calculated performance characteristics can be used as indicative values of the method performance. For detailed information on the validation, see Clause 11 and Annexes C to F.
- Technical specification42 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document specifies the enumeration of Clostridium (C.) perfringens by colony-count technique.
This document is applicable to:
— products intended for human consumption;
— products for feeding animals;
— environmental samples in the area of food and feed production and handling;
— samples from the primary production stage.
NOTE This method has been validated in an interlaboratory study for the following food categories:
— ready-to-eat, ready-to-reheat meat products;
— eggs and egg products (derivates);
— processed fruits and vegetables;
— infant formula and infant cereals;
— multi-component foods or meal components.
It has also been validated for the following other categories:
— pet food and animal feed;
— environmental samples (food or feed production).
As this method has been validated for at least five food categories, this method is applicable for a broad range of food. For detailed information on the validation, see Clause 11 and Annex C. Since the method is not commonly used for samples in the primary production stage, this category was not included in the interlaboratory study. Therefore, no performance characteristics were obtained for this category.
This horizontal method was originally developed for the examination of all samples belonging to the food chain. Based on the information available at the time of publication of this document, this method is considered to be fully suited to the examination of all samples belonging to the food chain. However, because of the large variety of products in the food chain, it is possible that this horizontal method is not appropriate in every detail for all products. Nevertheless, it is expected that the required modifications are minimized so that they do not result in a significant deviation from this horizontal method.
This technique is suitable for, but not limited to, the enumeration of microorganisms in test samples with a minimum of 10 colonies counted on a plate. This corresponds to a level of contamination that is expected to be higher than 10 cfu/ml for liquid samples or higher than 100 cfu/g for solid samples.
- Standard53 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document specifies the enumeration of Clostridium (C.) perfringens by colony-count technique.
This document is applicable to:
— products intended for human consumption;
— products for feeding animals;
— environmental samples in the area of food and feed production and handling;
— samples from the primary production stage.
NOTE This method has been validated in an interlaboratory study for the following food categories:
— ready-to-eat, ready-to-reheat meat products;
— eggs and egg products (derivates);
— processed fruits and vegetables;
— infant formula and infant cereals;
— multi-component foods or meal components.
It has also been validated for the following other categories:
— pet food and animal feed;
— environmental samples (food or feed production).
As this method has been validated for at least five food categories, this method is applicable for a broad range of food. For detailed information on the validation, see Clause 11 and Annex C. Since the method is not commonly used for samples in the primary production stage, this category was not included in the interlaboratory study. Therefore, no performance characteristics were obtained for this category.
This horizontal method was originally developed for the examination of all samples belonging to the food chain. Based on the information available at the time of publication of this document, this method is considered to be fully suited to the examination of all samples belonging to the food chain. However, because of the large variety of products in the food chain, it is possible that this horizontal method is not appropriate in every detail for all products. Nevertheless, it is expected that the required modifications are minimized so that they do not result in a significant deviation from this horizontal method.
This technique is suitable for, but not limited to, the enumeration of microorganisms in test samples with a minimum of 10 colonies counted on a plate. This corresponds to a level of contamination that is expected to be higher than 10 cfu/ml for liquid samples or higher than 100 cfu/g for solid samples.
- Standard53 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document specifies the enumeration of sulfite-reducing Clostridium spp. by the colony-count technique.
This document is applicable to:
— products intended for human consumption;
— products for feeding animals;
— environmental samples in the area of food and feed production and handling;
— samples from the primary production stage.
NOTE This method has been validated in an interlaboratory study for the following food categories:
— ready-to-eat, ready-to-reheat meat products;
— eggs and egg products (derivates);
— processed fruits and vegetables;
— infant formula and infant cereals;
— multi-component foods or meal components.
It has also been validated for the following other categories:
— pet food and animal feed;
— environmental samples (food or feed production).
As this method has been validated for at least five food categories, this method is applicable for a broad range of food. For detailed information on the validation, see Clause 11 and Annex C. Since the method is not commonly used for samples in the primary production stage, this category was not included in the interlaboratory study. Therefore, no performance characteristics were obtained for this category.
This horizontal method was originally developed for the examination of all samples belonging to the food chain. Based on the information available at the time of publication of this document, this method is considered to be fully suited to the examination of all samples belonging to the food chain. However, because of the large variety of products in the food chain, it is possible that this horizontal method is not appropriate in every detail for all products. Nevertheless, it is expected that the required modifications are minimized so that they do not result in a significant deviation from this horizontal method.
This technique is suitable for, but not limited to, the enumeration of microorganisms in test samples with a minimum of 10 colonies counted on a plate. This corresponds to a level of contamination that is expected to be higher than 10 cfu/ml for liquid samples or higher than 100 cfu/g for solid samples.
- Standard30 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document specifies the enumeration of sulfite-reducing Clostridium spp. by the colony-count technique.
This document is applicable to:
— products intended for human consumption;
— products for feeding animals;
— environmental samples in the area of food and feed production and handling;
— samples from the primary production stage.
NOTE This method has been validated in an interlaboratory study for the following food categories:
— ready-to-eat, ready-to-reheat meat products;
— eggs and egg products (derivates);
— processed fruits and vegetables;
— infant formula and infant cereals;
— multi-component foods or meal components.
It has also been validated for the following other categories:
— pet food and animal feed;
— environmental samples (food or feed production).
As this method has been validated for at least five food categories, this method is applicable for a broad range of food. For detailed information on the validation, see Clause 11 and Annex C. Since the method is not commonly used for samples in the primary production stage, this category was not included in the interlaboratory study. Therefore, no performance characteristics were obtained for this category.
This horizontal method was originally developed for the examination of all samples belonging to the food chain. Based on the information available at the time of publication of this document, this method is considered to be fully suited to the examination of all samples belonging to the food chain. However, because of the large variety of products in the food chain, it is possible that this horizontal method is not appropriate in every detail for all products. Nevertheless, it is expected that the required modifications are minimized so that they do not result in a significant deviation from this horizontal method.
This technique is suitable for, but not limited to, the enumeration of microorganisms in test samples with a minimum of 10 colonies counted on a plate. This corresponds to a level of contamination that is expected to be higher than 10 cfu/ml for liquid samples or higher than 100 cfu/g for solid samples.
- Standard30 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document describes a method for the determination of T-2 toxin and HT-2 toxin in cereals and cereal-based products, e.g. oats, intended for nutrition of infants and young children by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) after cleanup by solid phase extraction (SPE) [5].
The method has been validated for HT-2 toxin in oat flour at levels of 9,3 µg/kg and 28,1 µg/kg, oat flakes at levels of 16,5 µg/kg and 21,4 µg/kg, and breakfast cereals (containing oat flakes) at a level of 8,1 µg/kg and for T-2 toxin in oat flour at levels of 4,4 µg/kg and 8,3 µg/kg, oat flakes at levels of 4,9 µg/kg and 6,6 µg/kg and breakfast cereals (containing oat flakes) at a level of 3,5 µg/kg.
Laboratory experiences [6] have shown that the method is also applicable to highly swelling materials (dry cereal-based porridges and modified starches), but these were not examined in the method validation study. Details are outlined in 7.3.
The method can also be applied to oat-by-products at higher levels of T-2- and HT-2 toxin. In this case, the dilution steps need to be considered [6].
The method can also be applied to cereals and cereal products for infants and young children based on e.g. wheat, barley and rice. In this case, the method needs to be in-house-validated for each material. At the time of the interlaboratory study, planned range was 10 µg/kg to 100 µg/kg, and it is known from the pre-study that the method works well in the whole range, although final validation was only done in the range from 3,5 µg/kg to 28,1 µg/kg.
- Standard27 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document describes a method for the determination of T-2 toxin and HT-2 toxin in cereals and cereal-based products, e.g. oats, intended for nutrition of infants and young children by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) after cleanup by solid phase extraction (SPE) [5].
The method has been validated for HT-2 toxin in oat flour at levels of 9,3 µg/kg and 28,1 µg/kg, oat flakes at levels of 16,5 µg/kg and 21,4 µg/kg, and breakfast cereals (containing oat flakes) at a level of 8,1 µg/kg and for T-2 toxin in oat flour at levels of 4,4 µg/kg and 8,3 µg/kg, oat flakes at levels of 4,9 µg/kg and 6,6 µg/kg and breakfast cereals (containing oat flakes) at a level of 3,5 µg/kg.
Laboratory experiences [6] have shown that the method is also applicable to highly swelling materials (dry cereal-based porridges and modified starches), but these were not examined in the method validation study. Details are outlined in 7.3.
The method can also be applied to oat-by-products at higher levels of T-2- and HT-2 toxin. In this case, the dilution steps need to be considered [6].
The method can also be applied to cereals and cereal products for infants and young children based on e.g. wheat, barley and rice. In this case, the method needs to be in-house-validated for each material. At the time of the interlaboratory study, planned range was 10 µg/kg to 100 µg/kg, and it is known from the pre-study that the method works well in the whole range, although final validation was only done in the range from 3,5 µg/kg to 28,1 µg/kg.
- Standard27 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document specifies a method for the detection of foodstuff containing cellulose which have been treated with ionizing radiation, by analysing the electron spin resonance (ESR) spectrum, also called electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectrum, of the foodstuff, see [1] to [13].
Interlaboratory studies have been successfully carried out with pistachio nut shells, [14] to [18], paprika powder [19] and [20] and fresh strawberries [21]. However, it has been shown that chemical bleaching of nuts in shells can lead to comparable signals. For further information, see Clause 8 on limitations.
- Standard16 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document specifies a method for the detection of foodstuff containing crystalline sugars which have been treated with ionizing radiation, by analysing the electron spin resonance (ESR) spectrum, also called electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectrum, of the foodstuff, see [1] to [7].
Interlaboratory studies have been successfully carried out on dried figs, dried mangoes, dried papayas and raisins, see [1] to [3].
- Standard12 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document specifies a method for the detection of foodstuff containing crystalline sugars which have been treated with ionizing radiation, by analysing the electron spin resonance (ESR) spectrum, also called electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectrum, of the foodstuff, see [1] to [7].
Interlaboratory studies have been successfully carried out on dried figs, dried mangoes, dried papayas and raisins, see [1] to [3].
- Standard12 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document specifies a method for the detection of foodstuff containing cellulose which have been treated with ionizing radiation, by analysing the electron spin resonance (ESR) spectrum, also called electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectrum, of the foodstuff, see [1] to [13].
Interlaboratory studies have been successfully carried out with pistachio nut shells, [14] to [18], paprika powder [19] and [20] and fresh strawberries [21]. However, it has been shown that chemical bleaching of nuts in shells can lead to comparable signals. For further information, see Clause 8 on limitations.
- Standard16 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document specifies a method for the analysis of pesticide residues in foods of plant and of animal origin by ethyl acetate extraction using GC- and LC-MS/MS (SweEt).
- Technical specification17 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document specifies a method for the analysis of pesticide residues in foods of plant and of animal origin by ethyl acetate extraction using GC- and LC-MS/MS (SweEt).
- Technical specification17 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document specifies a method for the detection of Anisakidae L3 larvae commonly found in marine and anadromous fishes. The method is applicable to fresh fish and/or frozen fish, as well as lightly processed fish products, such as marinated, salted or cold smoked.
This method is applicable to quantifying parasitic infections by estimating the number of parasites in the fish musculature.
This method does not apply to determining the species or genotype of detected parasites. Final identification is made by morphological and/or molecular methods.
- Standard17 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document specifies a method for the detection of Anisakidae L3 larvae commonly found in marine and anadromous fishes. The method is applicable to fresh fish and/or frozen fish, as well as lightly processed fish products, such as marinated, salted or smoked. It is also suitable for visceral organs as a confirmatory method for a visual inspection scheme.
The artificial digestion method[4][5][6] is applicable to quantifying parasitic infections by estimating the number of parasites in the fish musculature and, when applied to fresh fish or lightly processed fish products (never frozen before processing), determining the viability of Anisakidae L3, which can be present.
This method does not apply to determining the species or genotype of detected parasites. Final identification is made by morphological and/or molecular methods.
- Standard17 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
- Standard14 pagesGerman languagee-Library read for1 day
This document describes a procedure for the determination of the citrinin content in food (cereals, red yeast rice (RYR)), herbs and food supplements by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).
This method has been validated for citrinin in red yeast rice and in the formulated food supplements in the range of 2,5 μg/kg to 3 000 μg/kg and in wheat flour in the range of 2,5 μg/kg to 100 μg/kg.
Laboratory experiences have shown that this method is also applicable to white rice, herbs such as a powder of ginkgo biloba leaves and the formulated food supplements in the range of 2,5 μg/kg to 50 μg/kg.
- Standard23 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document specifies a method for the detection of Anisakidae L3 larvae commonly found in marine and anadromous fishes. The method is applicable to fresh fish and/or frozen fish, as well as lightly processed fish products, such as marinated, salted or cold smoked.
This method is applicable to quantifying parasitic infections by estimating the number of parasites in the fish musculature.
This method does not apply to determining the species or genotype of detected parasites. Final identification is made by morphological and/or molecular methods.
- Standard17 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document specifies a method for the detection of Anisakidae L3 larvae commonly found in marine and anadromous fishes. The method is applicable to fresh fish and/or frozen fish, as well as lightly processed fish products, such as marinated, salted or smoked. It is also suitable for visceral organs as a confirmatory method for a visual inspection scheme.
The artificial digestion method[4][5][6] is applicable to quantifying parasitic infections by estimating the number of parasites in the fish musculature and, when applied to fresh fish or lightly processed fish products (never frozen before processing), determining the viability of Anisakidae L3, which can be present.
This method does not apply to determining the species or genotype of detected parasites. Final identification is made by morphological and/or molecular methods.
- Standard17 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
- Standard14 pagesGerman languagee-Library read for1 day
This document describes a procedure for the determination of the citrinin content in food (cereals, red yeast rice (RYR)), herbs and food supplements by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).
This method has been validated for citrinin in red yeast rice and in the formulated food supplements in the range of 2,5 μg/kg to 3 000 μg/kg and in wheat flour in the range of 2,5 μg/kg to 100 μg/kg.
Laboratory experiences have shown that this method is also applicable to white rice, herbs such as a powder of ginkgo biloba leaves and the formulated food supplements in the range of 2,5 μg/kg to 50 μg/kg.
- Standard23 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document describes the performance characteristics and minimum performance criteria for conducting a single-laboratory validation study for qualitative (binary) real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods applied for the detection of specific DNA sequences present in foods.
The protocol was developed for qualitative real-time PCR methods for the detection of DNA sequences derived from genetically modified foodstuffs. It is applicable also for single-laboratory validation of qualitative PCR methods used for analysis of other food materials, e.g. for species detection and identification.
The document does not cover the evaluation of the applicability and the practicability with respect to the specific scope of the PCR method.
- Technical specification23 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
This document describes the performance characteristics and minimum performance criteria for conducting a single-laboratory validation study for qualitative (binary) real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods applied for the detection of specific DNA sequences present in foods.
The protocol was developed for qualitative real-time PCR methods for the detection of DNA sequences derived from genetically modified foodstuffs. It is applicable also for single-laboratory validation of qualitative PCR methods used for analysis of other food materials, e.g. for species detection and identification.
The document does not cover the evaluation of the applicability and the practicability with respect to the specific scope of the PCR method.
- Technical specification23 pagesEnglish languagee-Library read for1 day
Frequently Asked Questions
An EU Regulation is a binding legislative act that must be applied in its entirety across the European Union. Unlike directives, regulations do not need to be transposed into national law and are directly applicable in all member states. Regulations are used when uniform application across all EU countries is essential.
Regulation 2017/625 covers "Regulation (EU) 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2017 on official controls and other official activities performed to ensure the application of food and feed law, rules on animal health and welfare, plant health and plant protection products". There are 30 standards associated with this regulation.
Harmonized standards under 2017/625 are European standards (ENs) developed by CEN, CENELEC, or ETSI in response to a mandate from the European Commission. When these standards are cited in the Official Journal of the European Union, products manufactured in conformity with them benefit from a presumption of conformity with the essential requirements of 2017/625, facilitating CE marking and free movement within the European Economic Area.