General Information

Abstract

Definition of tests in TTCN to determine conformance of implementations of ETS 300 009 Version 3 and ITU-T Q.711 to Q.714 (Whitebook) includes PIXIT proforma

Status
Published
Publication Date
30-Nov-2003
Withdrawal Date
30-Jun-1999
Current Stage
6060 - National Implementation/Publication (Adopted Project)
Start Date
01-Dec-2003
Due Date
01-Dec-2003
Completion Date
01-Dec-2003
Mandate
BC-T-338

Buy Documents

Standard

SIST ETS 300 009-3 E1:2003

English language (65 pages)
Preview
Preview
e-Library read for
×1 day

Overview

SIST ETS 300 009-3 E1:2003 specifies standardized conformance testing for the Signalling Connection Control Part (SCCP) within the Signalling System No.7 (SS7) stack, supporting both connectionless and connection-oriented (class 2) services in Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) environments. Developed by the Slovenian Institute for Standardization (SIST) and harmonized with European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) guidelines, this standard focuses on the Abstract Test Suite (ATS) and the Protocol Implementation eXtra Information for Testing (PIXIT) proforma. It enables systematic verification that implementations of ETS 300 009 (aligned with ITU-T Recommendations Q.711 to Q.714) conform to expected signaling and protocol behaviors, especially for international interconnection scenarios.

Key Topics

  • Conformance Testing: The standard defines test cases using Tree and Tabular Combined Notation (TTCN), enabling structured and repeatable validation of SCCP protocol implementations. The primary targets are classes 0, 1, and 2, ensuring coverage for both connectionless and connection-oriented transaction modes.
  • ATS and PIXIT Proforma:
    • ATS: A defined set of abstract, implementation-independent test cases to assess protocol behavior.
    • PIXIT: A structured questionnaire to capture test-relevant details about the implementation under test (IUT), covering items such as configuration options, point codes, subsystem numbers, and supported features.
  • Multi-party Test Configurations: Provides guidance on configuring test networks, including main and parallel test components as well as relay and remote single layer methods, for realistic simulation of SS7 signaling pathways among network nodes.
  • Reporting and Documentation: Includes proforma templates for Protocol Conformance Test Reports (PCTR) and PIXIT, promoting consistency in documenting test results and system properties critical for vendor and laboratory use.
  • Reference to International Methods: The testing methodology is firmly based on international standards (ISO/IEC 9646 series and ETS 300 406), ensuring recognized best practices in protocol conformance assessment.

Applications

Implementing the guidelines in SIST ETS 300 009-3 E1:2003 delivers several essential benefits across the telecommunications sector:

  • Vendor Product Compliance: Validates that signaling products conform to international SS7 SCCP standards, a requirement for market access and interoperability.
  • Network Operator Assurance: Assists service providers in qualifying purchased equipment for ISDN and SS7 compatibility, minimizing risk during network integration.
  • Interoperability Testing: Critical for cross-vendor and cross-border connections, ensuring that SS7 signaling functions as expected in diverse, multi-operator environments.
  • Test Laboratory Accreditation: Laboratories use the defined ATS and PIXIT proformas to structure their test processes, supporting standardized, auditable testing procedures indispensable for industry certification schemes.
  • Regulatory and Contractual Fulfillment: Satisfy contractual, regulatory, or procurement requirements to demonstrate protocol conformance using recognized test suites and reporting formats.

Related Standards

For a comprehensive conformance testing approach and optimal system compatibility, reference should also be made to these related standards:

  • ETS 300 009-1: Protocol specification for SCCP, including modifications to ITU-T Recommendations Q.711 to Q.714 and Q.716.
  • ETS 300 009-2: Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement (PICS) proforma specification.
  • ETS 300 406: Methods for Testing and Specification (MTS); guidance on standard test methodologies.
  • ISO/IEC 9646 series: OSI conformance testing methodology and framework, covering general concepts, ATS specification, TTCN, realization, and laboratory requirements.
  • ITU-T Q.711 - Q.714: Core SCCP protocol recommendations.
  • ETS 300 008-1: SS7 Message Transfer Part (MTP) protocol specification for international interconnection.

In summary, SIST ETS 300 009-3 E1:2003 is vital for consistent, interoperable SS7 signaling implementations through standardized conformance testing, supporting reliable ISDN services and seamless international telecommunications integration.

Buy Documents

Standard

SIST ETS 300 009-3 E1:2003

English language (65 pages)
Preview
Preview
e-Library read for
×1 day

Get Certified

Connect with accredited certification bodies for this standard

ANCE

Mexican certification and testing association.

EMA Mexico Verified

Intertek Slovenia

Intertek testing, inspection, and certification services in Slovenia.

UKAS Slovenia Verified

LNE (Laboratoire National de Métrologie et d'Essais)

French national laboratory for metrology and testing.

COFRAC France Verified

Sponsored listings

Frequently Asked Questions

SIST ETS 300 009-3 E1:2003 is a standard published by the Slovenian Institute for Standardization (SIST). Its full title is "Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN); Signalling System No.7; Signalling Connection Control Part (SCCP) (connectionless and connection-oriented class 2) to support international interconnection; Part 3: Abstract Test Suite (ATS) and partial Protocol Implementation eXtra Information for Testing (PIXIT) proforma specification". This standard covers: Definition of tests in TTCN to determine conformance of implementations of ETS 300 009 Version 3 and ITU-T Q.711 to Q.714 (Whitebook) includes PIXIT proforma

Definition of tests in TTCN to determine conformance of implementations of ETS 300 009 Version 3 and ITU-T Q.711 to Q.714 (Whitebook) includes PIXIT proforma

SIST ETS 300 009-3 E1:2003 is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 33.080 - Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN). The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.

SIST ETS 300 009-3 E1:2003 is associated with the following European legislation: Standardization Mandates: BC-T-338. When a standard is cited in the Official Journal of the European Union, products manufactured in conformity with it benefit from a presumption of conformity with the essential requirements of the corresponding EU directive or regulation.

SIST ETS 300 009-3 E1:2003 is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.

Standards Content (Sample)


SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-december-2003
Digitalno omrežje z integriranimi storitvami (ISDN) – Sistem signalizacije št. 7 –
Krmilni del signalizacijske zveze (SCCP) (nepovezavni in povezavni /razred 2/) za
podporo mednarodnemu medomrežnemu povezovanju – Abstraktni preskušalni
niz (ATS) in delna dodatna informacija za preskušanje izvedbe protokola (PIXIT) –
Proforma specifikacija
Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN); Signalling System No.7; Signalling
Connection Control Part (SCCP) (connectionless and connection-oriented class 2) to
support international interconnection; Part 3: Abstract Test Suite (ATS) and partial
Protocol Implementation eXtra Information for Testing (PIXIT) proforma specification
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: ETS 300 009-3 Edition 1
ICS:
33.080 Digitalno omrežje z Integrated Services Digital
integriranimi storitvami Network (ISDN)
(ISDN)
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

EUROPEAN ETS 300 009-3
TELECOMMUNICATION January 2000
STANDARD
Source: SPS Reference: DE/SPS-02021
ICS: 33.020
Key words: ATS, PIXIT, ISDN, SCCP, SS7
Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN);
Signalling System No.7;
Signalling Connection Control Part (SCCP)
(connectionless and connection-oriented class 2)
to support international interconnection;
Part 3: Abstract Test Suite (ATS) and partial
Protocol Implementation eXtra Information for Testing (PIXIT)
proforma specification
ETSI
European Telecommunications Standards Institute
ETSI Secretariat
Postal address: F-06921 Sophia Antipolis CEDEX - FRANCE
Office address: 650 Route des Lucioles - Sophia Antipolis - Valbonne - FRANCE
Internet: secretariat@etsi.fr - http://www.etsi.org
Tel.:+33492944200- Fax:+33493654716
Copyright Notification: No part may be reproduced except as authorized by written permission. The copyright and the
foregoing restriction extend to reproduction in all media.
© European Telecommunications Standards Institute 2000. All rights reserved.

Page 2
ETS 300 009-3: January 2000
Whilst every care has been taken in the preparation and publication of this document, errors in content,
typographical or otherwise, may occur. If you have comments concerning its accuracy, please write to
"ETSI Standards Making Support Dept." at the address shown on the title page.

Page 3
ETS 300 009-3: January 2000
Contents
Foreword.5
1 Scope .7
2 Normative references.7
3 Definitions and abbreviations .8
3.1 Definitions .8
3.2 Abbreviations .8
4 Abstract test method .9
4.1 Description of ATMs used.9
4.2 Conventions for test components and PCOs.9
4.3 The remote single layer test method.10
4.4 The relay transverse ATM.11
5 Untestable Test purposes .11
Annex A (normative): Protocol Conformance Test Report (PCTR) proforma.12
A.1 Identification summary .12
A.1.1 Protocol conformance test report.12
A.1.2 IUT identification .12
A.1.3 Testing environment .12
A.1.4 Limits and reservations .13
A.1.5 Comments.13
A.2 IUT conformance status .13
A.3 Static conformance summary.13
A.4 Dynamic conformance summary.13
A.5 Static conformance review report.14
A.6 Test campaign report .14
A.7 Observations .14
Annex B (normative): Partial PIXIT proforma.15
B.1 Identification summary .15
B.2 Abstract test suite summary.15
B.3 Test laboratory.16
B.4 Client .17
B.5 System under test.18
B.5.1 SUT identification.18
B.6 Protocol information .18
B.6.1 Protocol identification.18
B.6.2 Configuration to be tested.19
B.6.3 Configuration options .19

Page 4
ETS 300 009-3: January 2000
B.6.4 Routing information . 19
B.6.4.1 Signalling point code. 19
B.6.4.2 Signalling link selection. 19
B.6.4.3 Subsystem number. 20
B.6.4.4 GT translation . 20
B.6.5 Sending of messages by the IUT . 21
B.6.6 User data PDU field parameters . 22
B.6.7 SCCP management . 24
B.6.8 Timer values. 25
B.6.8.1 Timers used in the SCCP test suite. 25
B.6.8.2 Additional timers used in the SCCP test suite . 25
Annex C (normative): Test suite structure and test purposes. 26
C.1 General . 26
C.1.1 Structure. 26
C.1.2 Number of test purposes. 26
C.1.3 TSS&TP compliance clause. 27
C.2 SCCP test purposes . 27
C.2.1 Static conformance requirements . 27
C.2.2 Dynamic conformance requirements . 33
C.2.2.1 SCCP connectionless . 33
C.2.2.1.1 Routing. 33
C.2.2.1.2 Data transfer . 41
C.2.2.2 SCCP management. 44
C.2.2.3 SCCP connection-oriented . 45
C.3 ATS to TP map. 51
Annex D (normative): Abstract test suite . 58
D.1 The TTCN Graphical form (TTCN.GR). 58
D.2 The TTCN Machine Processable form (TTCN.MP). 58
Annex E (informative): Nomenclature, guidelines and conventions . 59
E.1 SCCP nomenclature . 59
E.1.1 Declarations Part. 59
E.1.2 Constraints part . 60
E.1.3 Dynamic behaviour. 60
E.2 Conventions for the use of TTCN . 60
E.2.1 Programming style conventions . 60
E.2.1.1 General conventions. 61
E.2.1.2 Declarations Part . 61
E.2.1.3 Constraints Part . 62
E.2.1.4 Dynamic Part . 62
E.2.2 Implementation dependent conventions. 62
E.3 SCCP specific guidelines. 63
E.3.1 Test Suite Overview .63
E.3.2 Declarations Part. 63
E.3.3 Constraints Part. 63
E.3.4 Dynamic Part. 64
History. 65

Page 5
ETS 300 009-3: January 2000
Foreword
This European Telecommunication Standard (ETS) has been produced by the Signalling Protocols and
Switching (SPS) Technical Committee of the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI).
This ETS is part 3 of a multi-part ETS covering the Signalling System No.7 Signalling Connection Control
Part (SCCP) to support international interconnection as described below:
Part 1: "Protocol specification [ITU-T Recommendations Q.711 to Q.716 (1996), modified]";
Part 2: "Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement (PICS) proforma specification";
Part 3: "Abstract Test Suite (ATS) and partial Protocol Implementation eXtra Information for
Testing (PIXIT) proforma specification".
Transposition dates
Date of adoption of this ETS: 31 December 1999
Date of latest announcement of this ETS (doa):
31 March 2000
Date of latest publication of new National Standard
or endorsement of this ETS (dop/e): 30 September 2000
Date of withdrawal of any conflicting National Standard (dow): 30 September 2000

Page 6
ETS 300 009-3: January 2000
Blank page
Page 7
ETS 300 009-3: January 2000
1 Scope
This third part of ETS 300 009 specifies the Abstract Test Suite (ATS) and partial Protocol Implementation
eXtra Information for Testing (PIXIT) proforma for the Signalling Connection Control Part (SCCP) for
implementations conforming to ITU-T Recommendations Q.711 to Q.714 and Q.716 as modified by
ETS 300 009-1 [1]. The Test Suite Structure and Test Purposes (TSS&TP) related to this ATS and partial
PIXIT proforma specification are specified in annex B and C of the present document.
The test cases validate Classes 0, 1 and 2 SCCP procedures by monitoring and analysing SCCP
messages and their contents.
Testing of SCCP connection-oriented protocol Class 3 is out of the scope of this ETS.
ISO/IEC 9646-1 [4], ISO/IEC 9646-2 [5], ISO/IEC 9646-3 [6], ISO/IEC 9646-4 [7] and ISO/IEC 9646-5 [8]
and ETS 300 406 [3] are used as the basis for the test methodology.
2 Normative references
This ETS incorporates by dated and undated reference, provisions from other publications. These
normative references are cited at the appropriate places in the text and the publications are listed
hereafter. For dated references, subsequent amendments to or revisions of any of these publications
apply to this ETS only when incorporated in it by amendment or revision. For undated references the latest
edition of the publication referred to applies.
[1] ETS 300 009-1 (1996): "Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN); Signalling
System No.7; Signalling Connection Control Part (SCCP) (connectionless and
connection-oriented class 2) to support international interconnection; Part 1:
Protocol specification [ITU-T Recommendations Q.711 to Q.714 and Q.716
(1993), modified]".
[2] EN 300 009-2 (1996): "Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN); Signalling
System No.7; Signalling Connection Control Part (SCCP) (connectionless and
connection-oriented class 2) to support international interconnection; Part 2:
Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement (PICS) proforma
specification".
[3] ETS 300 406 (1995): "Methods for Testing and Specification (MTS); Protocol
and profile conformance testing specifications; Standardization methodology".
[4] ISO/IEC 9646-1: "Information technology - Open Systems Interconnection -
Conformance testing methodology and framework - Part 1: General concepts".
[5] ISO/IEC 9646-2: "Information technology - Open Systems Interconnection -
Conformance testing methodology and framework - Part 2: Abstract Test Suite
specification".
[6] ISO/IEC 9646-3: "Information technology - Open Systems Interconnection -
Conformance testing methodology and framework - Part 3: The Tree and
Tabular Combined Notation (TTCN)".
[7] ISO/IEC 9646-4: "Information technology - Open Systems Interconnection -
Conformance testing methodology and framework - Part 4: Test realization".
[8] ISO/IEC 9646-5: "Information technology - Open Systems Interconnection -
Conformance testing methodology and framework - Part 5: Requirements on
test laboratories and clients for the conformance assessment process".
[9] ITU-T Recommendation Q.786 (1993): "SCCP test specification".

Page 8
ETS 300 009-3: January 2000
[10] ETS 300 008-1 (1996): "Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN); Signalling
System No.7; Message Transfer Part (MTP) to support international
interconnection; Part 1: Protocol specification [ITU-T Recommendations Q.701
(1993), Q.702 (1988), Q.703 to Q.706 (1993), modified]".
3 Definitions and abbreviations
3.1 Definitions
For the purposes of this ETS, the following definitions apply:
Abstract (N-)Service Primitive ((N-)ASP): see ISO/IEC 9646-1 [4].
Abstract Test Suite (ATS): see ISO/IEC 9646-1 [4].
Implementation Under Test (IUT): see ISO/IEC 9646-1 [4].
Means Of Testing (MOT): see ISO/IEC 9646-1 [4].
Protocol Conformance Test Report (PCTR): see ISO/IEC 9646-1 [4].
Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement (PICS): see ISO/IEC 9646-1 [4].
PICS proforma: see ISO/IEC 9646-1 [4].
Protocol Implementation eXtra Information for Testing (PIXIT): see ISO/IEC 9646-1 [4].
PIXIT proforma: see ISO/IEC 9646-1 [4].
System Under Test (SUT): see ISO/IEC 9646-1 [4].
3.2 Abbreviations
For the purposes of this ETS, the following abbreviations apply:
AL ALlowed
ATM Abstract Test Method
ATS Abstract Test Suite
BC BroadCast
CAP CAPability test
CC Connection Confirm
Cda Called address
Cga Calling address
CL ConnectionLess
CL0 Protocol Class 0
CL1 Protocol Class 1
CR Connection Request
CSE Co-ordinated State change
DCR Dynamic Conformance Requirement
DP DPC included
DPC Destination Point Code
DT Data Transfer
GT Global Title
IB Inopportune Behaviour
IC Implementation Class
IUT Implementation Under Test
LTs Lower Testers
MA MAnagement
MFM Message From MTP
MFS Message From SCCP
MML Man Machine Language
MOT Means Of Testing
Page 9
ETS 300 009-3: January 2000
MTC Main Test Component
MTP Message Transfer Part
ND DPC not included
NG Not route on GT
OG routeOnGT
OPC Originating Point Code
PCO Point of Control and Observation
PICS Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement
PIXIT Protocol Implementation eXtra Information for Testing
PR PRohibited
PTC Parallel Test Component
REL RELease
RS Remote Single layer
RT RouTeing
SB Syntactically invalid Behaviour
SCCP Signalling Connection Control Part
SCR Static Conformance Requirement
SCS System Conformance Statement
SLS Signalling Link Selection
SOG Subsystem Out of service Grant
SOR Subsystem Out of service Request
SP Signalling Point
SR Segmentation and Reassembly
SS SubSystem
SSA SubSystem Allowed
SSN SubSystem Number
SSP SubSystem Prohibited
SST Subsystem Status Test
ST Setup
ST Status Test
SUT System Under Test
TSS&TP Test Suite Structure and Test Purposes
UDT UnitDaTa
UDTS UnitDaTa Service
VB Valid Behaviour
XUDT eXtended UnitDaTa
XUDTS eXtended UnitDaTa Service
YT Relay Transverse
4 Abstract test method
4.1 Description of ATMs used
Within this ATS, two ATMs are used. These are the RS and the YT test methods. Their applicability
depends on the IUT's functionality and capabilities.
Some of the described tests may not be required to be executed since the respective functionality is not
included in the IUT (the implemented functionalities should be described in the completed PICS proforma,
see EN 300 009-2 [2]). In such a case, the non-execution of these specific tests should not be regarded
as a non-conformance statement.
IUTs which are to be tested using this ATS are required to have previously been tested for conformity
against and passed the test suites for ETS 300 008-1 [10].
4.2 Conventions for test components and PCOs
SCCP communication is required between the SPs used in the test configurations. Two configurations are
required to perform all these tests. It should be possible that a SP can be a primary/backup node for
another SP. Furthermore, it should be possible that the SPs contain concerned SSs. All SPs should be in
the same MTP network. There should be one SPC for the IUT (SP A), containing two different SSNs, and
two SPCs, with one SSN each, for each test component (SP B, SP C).

Page 10
ETS 300 009-3: January 2000
SP_B and SP_C contain LTs B and C, respectively. An operator above the IUT is required in some cases
to answer to implicit send requesting the emission of messages or to apply MA command on the
configuration of the SUT. The MA procedures are requested with message including MML commands.
The contents of those message have to be fulfilled in this PIXIT and depends of the IUT. The lower
interface of the IUT is reached via the LTs and the service provider. LT_B, LT_C, SUT_MML are all
PCOs.
The ATS is based on multi party test method. Thus the test system is made up one Main Test Component
(MTC) and eventually a Parallel Test Component (PTC) in test configuration for relay node.
TestSystem=SPB&C SUT=SPA
SUT_MML
Request of MML actions
user
CP_B_C
or Implicit send
PTC
MTC
SSN A1 SSN A2
SSNB SSNC
IUT=SCCP
LT_C
LT_B
Service Provider MTP
Figure 1: General test configuration with its PCOs
4.3 The remote single layer test method
SP A is the SUT and requires in case of the RS method needs no additional requirements from the SUT.
However, sometimes a SCCP operator should be available to trigger the IUT and to apply requested
command (MML). The arrows in figure 2 indicate an SCCP relation.
test suite System Under Test
SP_B
IUT=SCCP
Figure 2: Configuration for the RS

Page 11
ETS 300 009-3: January 2000
4.4 The relay transverse ATM
SP A is the SUT and is used as a relay point (see figure 3). The arrows indicate an SCCP relation. All SPs
are in the same MTP network. MTC and PTC synchronized themselves by exchanging message at
co-ordination point CP_B_C. The test case is stopped and the final verdict is set by the MTC.
test suite
CP_B_C
System Under Test
SP_B SP_C
IUT=SCCP
Figure 3: Configuration for the YT method
5 Untestable Test purposes
No upper tester has been defined in the standard protocol. Consequently, test purposes that cannot be
tested without upper tester have been considered as untestable. This concerns mainly test purpose that
check local procedure or the behaviour of the IUT concerning the use SCCP's ASP.

Page 12
ETS 300 009-3: January 2000
Annex A (normative): Protocol Conformance Test Report (PCTR) proforma
Notwithstanding the provisions of the copyright clause related to the text of this ETS, ETSI grants that
users of this ETS may freely reproduce the PCTR proforma in this annex so that it can be used for its
intended purposes and may further publish the completed PCTR.
A.1 Identification summary
A.1.1 Protocol conformance test report
PCTR number:
PCTR date:
Corresponding SCTR number:
Corresponding SCTR date:
Test laboratory identification:
Test laboratory manager:
Signature:
A.1.2 IUT identification
Name:
Version:
Protocol specification: ETS 300 009-1
PICS:
Previous PCTRs (if any)
A.1.3 Testing environment
PIXIT Reference number:
ATS Specification: ETS 300 009-3
ATM: Multi-party test method (see ISO/IEC 9646-2)
MOT identification:
Dates of testing:
Conformance log reference(s):
Retention date for log reference(s):

Page 13
ETS 300 009-3: January 2000
A.1.4 Limits and reservations
Additional information relevant to the technical contents or further use of the test report, or to the rights
and obligations of the test laboratory and the client, may be given here. Such information may include
restriction on the publication of the report.
.........................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................
A.1.5 Comments
Additional comments may be given by either the client or the test laboratory on any of the contents of the
PCTR, for example, to note disagreement between the two parties.
.........................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................
A.2 IUT conformance status
This IUT has/has not been shown by conformance assessment to be non-conforming to the specified
protocol specification.
Strike the appropriate words in this sentence. If the PICS for this IUT is consistent with the SCRs (as
specified in clause A.3 of this report) and there are no "FAIL" verdicts to be recorded (in clause A.6) strike
the words "has or", otherwise strike the words "or has not".
A.3 Static conformance summary
The PICS for this IUT is / is not consistent with the SCRs in the specified protocol.
Strike the appropriate words in this sentence.
A.4 Dynamic conformance summary
The test campaign did/did not reveal errors in the IUT.
Strike the appropriate words in this sentence. If there are no "FAIL" verdicts to be recorded (in clause A.6
of this report) strike the word "did", otherwise strike the words "did not".
Summary of the results of groups of tests:
.........................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................

Page 14
ETS 300 009-3: January 2000
A.5 Static conformance review report
If clause A.3 indicates non-conformance, this subclause itemizes the mismatches between the PICS and
the SCRs of the specified protocol specification.
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
A.6 Test campaign report
This table will be filled when test cases will be renumbered
ATS reference Selected? Run? Verdict Observations
(Y/N) (Y/N)
A.7 Observations
Additional information relevant to the technical content of the PCTR are given here.
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................

Page 15
ETS 300 009-3: January 2000
Annex B (normative): Partial PIXIT proforma
Notwithstanding the provisions of the copyright clause related to the text of this ETS, ETSI grants that
users of this ETS may freely reproduce the partial PIXIT proforma in this annex so that it can be used for
its intended purposes and may further publish the completed partial PIXIT.
B.1 Identification summary
PIXIT number:
.........................................................................................................................................................................
Test laboratory name:
.........................................................................................................................................................................
Date of issue:
.........................................................................................................................................................................
Issued to:
.........................................................................................................................................................................
The test laboratory may include client or contract references in the identification summary.
B.2 Abstract test suite summary
Protocol specification: ETS 300 009-1
.........................................................................................................................................................................
ATS specification: ETS 300 009-3
.........................................................................................................................................................................
ATM(s): Multi-party test method (see ISO/IEC 9646-2)
.........................................................................................................................................................................

Page 16
ETS 300 009-3: January 2000
B.3 Test laboratory
Test laboratory identification:
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
Accreditation status of the test service:
........................................................................................................................................................................
Accreditation reference:
........................................................................................................................................................................
Test laboratory manager:
........................................................................................................................................................................
Test laboratory contact:
........................................................................................................................................................................
Means of testing:
MOT may include any particular facilities such as: executable test suite, and upper/lower tester
realizations.
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
Instructions for completion:
The laboratory should include any special instructions necessary for the completion and return of the
proforma by the client.
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................

Page 17
ETS 300 009-3: January 2000
B.4 Client
Client identification:
.........................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................
Client test manager:
.........................................................................................................................................................................
Client contact:
.........................................................................................................................................................................
Test facilities required:
The client should record any particular facilities required for testing, if a range of facilities is provided by
the test laboratory.
.........................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................

Page 18
ETS 300 009-3: January 2000
B.5 System under test
B.5.1 SUT identification
Name:
........................................................................................................................................................................
Version:
........................................................................................................................................................................
SCS reference:
........................................................................................................................................................................
Machine configuration:
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
Operating system identification:
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
IUT identification:
........................................................................................................................................................................
PICS (all layers):
........................................................................................................................................................................
Limitations of the SUT:
........................................................................................................................................................................
Environmental conditions:
........................................................................................................................................................................
B.6 Protocol information
B.6.1 Protocol identification
Specification reference: ETS 300 009-1
Protocol version:
PICS references:
NOTE: The PICS references should reference a completed PICS which is conformant with the
PICS proforma contained in EN 300 009-2.

Page 19
ETS 300 009-3: January 2000
B.6.2 Configuration to be tested
Table B.1: Configuration to be tested
Item Configuration Supported
Y/N
1.1 Is the IUT configured as end node?
1.2 Is the IUT configured as relay node?
B.6.3 Configuration options
Table B.2: Configuration options
Item Configuration Supported
Y/N
2.1 Does the IUT supports class 0? (CLASS0_SUP)
2.2 Does the IUT supports class 1? (CLASS1_SUP)
2.3 Does the IUT supports class 2? (CLASS2_SUP)
Table B.3: Configuration's parameter
Item Parameter Type Value
3.1 Subsystem multiplicity indicator (SMI) Bitstring[8]
3.2 Maximum number of segment supported Integer
(NB_MAX_SEG)
B.6.4 Routing information
Ideally, for a complete configuration, there should be one SPC for the IUT, containing two different SSNs,
and two SPCs (with one SSN each) for the test system (testing the aspects of network border crossing is
for further study). PC A is assumed to be the IUT and PC B and PC C are assumed to be part of the test
system as described in the configuration scheme (see clause 5, figures 1 to 3). When only end node
configuration is tested, RT information concerning SP C has not to be valued. SSN A1 and SSN A2 in the
ATS are supposed to answer automatically to a CR with a CC.
B.6.4.1 Signalling point code
Table B.4: SP code
Item SP Code Value Value without filler
(octestring[2]) (bitstring[14])
4.1 SPA(IUT)
4.2 SP B
4.3 SP C
B.6.4.2 Signalling link selection
The SLS is not normally fixed but is assigned at random between (0.15) by MTP-users. However, for the
purposes of performing tests, the supplier of the SUT and/or the test laboratory may wish to specify the
SLS codes used by the tester. If these fields are left blank by the client then the test laboratory will
determine the SLS codes used by the tester.

Page 20
ETS 30
...