ISO 13232-3:2005
(Main)Motorcycles — Test and analysis procedures for research evaluation of rider crash protective devices fitted to motorcycles — Part 3: Motorcyclist anthropometric impact dummy
Motorcycles — Test and analysis procedures for research evaluation of rider crash protective devices fitted to motorcycles — Part 3: Motorcyclist anthropometric impact dummy
ISO 13232-3:2005 specifies the minimum requirements for the: biofidelity of the motorcyclist anthropometric impact dummy; compatibility of the dummy with motorcycles, helmets, multi-directional impacts, and the instrumentation; and repeatability and reproducibility of the dummy properties and responses. ISO 13232 specifies minimum requirements for research into the feasibility of protective devices fitted to motorcycles, which are intended to protect the rider in the event of a collision. ISO 13232 is applicable to impact tests involving: two-wheeled motorcycles; the specified type of opposing vehicle; either a stationary and a moving vehicle or two moving vehicles; for any moving vehicle, a steady speed and straight-line motion immediately prior to impact; one helmeted dummy in a normal seating position on an upright motorcycle; the measurement of the potential for specified types of injury, by body region; and evaluation of the results of paired impact tests (i.e. comparisons between motorcycles fitted and not fitted with the proposed devices). ISO 13232 does not apply to testing for regulatory or legislative purposes.
Motocycles — Méthodes d'essai et d'analyse de l'évaluation par la recherche des dispositifs, montés sur les motocycles, visant à la protection des motocyclistes contre les collisions — Partie 3: Mannequin anthropométrique de motocycliste pour essais de choc
General Information
Relations
Standards Content (Sample)
INTERNATIONAL ISO
STANDARD 13232-3
Second edition
2005-12-15
Motorcycles — Test and analysis
procedures for research evaluation of
rider crash protective devices fitted to
motorcycles —
Part 3:
Motorcyclist anthropometric impact
dummy
Motocycles — Méthodes d'essai et d'analyse de l'évaluation par la
recherche des dispositifs, montés sur les motocycles, visant à la
protection des motocyclistes contre les collisions —
Partie 3: Mannequin anthropométrique de motocycliste pour essais de
choc
Reference number
©
ISO 2005
PDF disclaimer
This PDF file may contain embedded typefaces. In accordance with Adobe's licensing policy, this file may be printed or viewed but
shall not be edited unless the typefaces which are embedded are licensed to and installed on the computer performing the editing. In
downloading this file, parties accept therein the responsibility of not infringing Adobe's licensing policy. The ISO Central Secretariat
accepts no liability in this area.
Adobe is a trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated.
Details of the software products used to create this PDF file can be found in the General Info relative to the file; the PDF-creation
parameters were optimized for printing. Every care has been taken to ensure that the file is suitable for use by ISO member bodies. In
the unlikely event that a problem relating to it is found, please inform the Central Secretariat at the address given below.
© ISO 2005
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means,
electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from either ISO at the address below or
ISO's member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
Case postale 56 • CH-1211 Geneva 20
Tel. + 41 22 749 01 11
Fax + 41 22 749 09 47
E-mail copyright@iso.org
Web www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii © ISO 2005 – All rights reserved
Contents Page
Foreword.viii
Introduction.ix
1 Scope.1
2 Normative references.1
3 Definitions .2
4 Mechanical requirements for the motorcyclist anthropometric impact dummy.2
4.1 Basis dummy .2
4.2 Motorcyclist dummy head and head skins .3
4.3 Motorcyclist dummy neck components.3
4.4 Motorcyclist dummy upper torso components .4
4.5 Motorcyclist dummy lower torso components.4
4.6 Arms and modified elbow bushing.5
4.7 Motorcyclist dummy hands .5
4.8 Motorcyclist dummy upper leg components.5
4.9 Motorcyclist dummy frangible knee assembly.6
4.10 Leg retaining cables.7
4.11 Motorcyclist dummy lower leg components.7
4.12 Complete motorcyclist dummy .7
4.13 Certification documentation.7
5 Sampling of frangible components .8
5.1 Initial conformity of production .8
5.2 Subsequent conformity of production .8
5.3 Condition of sampled frangible components .8
6 Test methods .8
6.1 Frangible bone static bending deflection test.8
6.2 Frangible bone static torsional deflection test.9
6.3 Frangible bone dynamic bending fracture test .9
6.4 Frangible bone dynamic torsional fracture test .9
6.5 Frangible femur bone static axial load fracture test .10
6.6 Frangible knee static strength and deflection test .10
6.7 Frangible abdomen test .10
6.8 Motorcyclist neck dynamic test for initial conformity of production.10
6.9 Motorcyclist neck static tests for subsequent conformity of production .20
7 Marking and documentation of frangible components.20
7.1 Marking .20
7.2 Documentation.20
Annex A (normative) Drawings for motorcyclist anthropometric impact dummy special components .21
Annex B (informative) Rationale for ISO 13232-3.50
Annex C (normative) Motorcyclist neck subsequent conformity of production test procedures.81
iii
Figures
Figure 1 — Extension moment vs. head angle.12
Figure 2 — Neck flexion bending moment vs. head angle.15
Figure 3 — Neck flexion occipital condyle and head centre of gravity position .15
Figure 4 — Flexion neck angle vs. head angle .16
Figure 5 — Lateral head angle vs. time.18
Figure 6 — Lateral head centre of gravity position.18
Figure 7 — Neck torsion stiffness.19
Figure A.1 — Motorcyclist head skins and extensions.22
Figure A.2 — Neck shroud specifications.23
Figure A.3 — Hybrid III modified lower neck mount .24
Figure A.4 — Motorcyclist neck and interface requirements.25
Figure A.5 — Lower lumbar spine transducer mount and ballast block for the six-axis load cell .26
Figure A.6 — Lower lumbar spine transducer mount and ballast block for the three-axis load cell .27
Figure A.7 — Lumbar spine abdomen reaction plate for the six-axis load cell .28
Figure A.8 — Lumbar spine abdomen reaction plate for the three-axis load cell .29
Figure A.9 — Replacement frangible solid abdominal insert .30
Figure A.10 — Elbow joint scribe marks for 10° arm pivot.31
Figure A.11 — Frangible femur bone to knee adaptor .32
Figure A.12 — Frangible femur bone interface and size requirements.33
Figure A.13 — Upper femur load cell simulator.34
Figure A.14 — Frangible knee and knee clevis assembly .35
Figure A.15 — Frangible tibia bone to ankle joint adaptor .36
Figure A.16 — Frangible tibia interface and size requirements .37
Figure A.17 — Modified lower skin.38
Figure A.18 — Frangible leg bone extensions for the bone bending tests .39
Figure A.19 — Specimen supports for the bone dynamic bending fracture test.40
Figure A.20 — Impactor head for the bone dynamic bending fracture test.41
Figure A.21 — Impactor box for the bone dynamic bending fracture test.42
Figure A.22 — Impactor accelerometer support for the bone dynamic bending fracture tests.43
iv
Figure A.23 — Impactor end plate and bearing mount for the bone dynamic bending fracture test.44
Figure A.24 — Impactor rail support for the bone dynamic bending fracture test.45
Figure A.25 — Frangible femur bone static axial load fracture test apparatus .46
Figure A.26 — Frangible knee test apparatus.47
Figure A.27 — Frangible abdomen test apparatus.48
Figure A.28 — Neck torsion test schematic .49
Figure B.1 — Sample extension acceleration pulse.52
Figure B.2 — Sample flexion acceleration pulse.53
Figure B.3 — Sample lateral acceleration pulse .53
Figure B.4 — Human neck elongation observed in Navy volunteer testing .57
Figure B.5 — Human response corridor and modified lumbar spine response of static moment vs. thoracic angular
displacement.59
Figure B.6 — Lower leg dynamic impact tests impact force vs. time: Hybrid III and cadaver legs.62
Figure B.7 — Lower leg dynamic impact tests impact force vs. time: Hybrid III legs and frangible leg, as defined in
4.11.1.63
Figure B.8 — Instrumented lower leg impact tests mid-tibia moment vs. time for drop height = 1,016 m: Hybrid III
leg and frangible leg, as defined in 4.11.1.63
Figure B.9 — Instrumented lower leg impact tests mid-tibia moment vs. time for drop height = 1,778 m: Hybrid III
leg and frangible leg, as defined in 4.11.1.
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.